Have a personal or library account? Click to login
DevOps Project Management Tools for Sprint Planning, Estimation and Execution Maturity Cover

DevOps Project Management Tools for Sprint Planning, Estimation and Execution Maturity

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. 1. Soni, M. The CASE for DevOps in Insurance Industry-End to End Automation on Cloud with Build Pipeline. – In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing in Emerging Markets, Gandhinagar, India, 2015.
  2. 2. Fitzgerald, B., K. -J. Stol. Continuous Software Engineering and Beyond: Trends and Challenges. – In: Proc. of 1st International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering (RCoSE), 2014, pp. 1-9.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/2593812.2593813" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1145/2593812.2593813</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  3. 3. The High Cost of Low Performance. The Essential Role of Communications (Accessed on 21 November 2017). <bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/the-essential-role-of-communications.pdf">http://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/the-essential-role-of-communications.pdf</ext-link></bold>
  4. 4. Drury, M., K. Conboy, K. Power. Decision Making in Agile Development: A Focus Group Study of Decisions and Obstacles. – In: Proc. of AGILE Conference (AGILE’11), 2011, pp. 39-47.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2011.27" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/AGILE.2011.27</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  5. 5. Alhazmi, A., S. Huang. A Decision Support System for Sprint Planning in Scrum Practice. – In: Proc. of IEEE SoutheastCon, Florida, USA, 4-7 April 2013, St. Petersburg, Rusia.
  6. 6. Sheshasaayee, A., V. Hannah. Identifying Bottlenecks in Agile Software Development Using Theory of Constraints Principles. – Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. <bold>8</bold>, 2015, No 29.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i29/85288" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i29/85288</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  7. 7. Kurmann, R. Agile SPL-SCM Agile Software Product Line Configuration and Release Management. – In: Proc. of 1st International Workshop on Agile Product Line Engineering (APLE’06), Maryland, USA, 2006.
  8. 8. Ahmed, F., S. Bouktif, L. F. Capretz. Organizational Behavior &amp; Software Product Line Engineering: An Empirical Study. – In: Proc. of International Conference Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA, IEEE/ACS, Rabat, 2009, pp. 420-427.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2009.5069359" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/AICCSA.2009.5069359</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  9. 9. Erich, F., A. Chintan, M. Daneva. DevOps Literature Review (Accessed on 24 October 2017). <bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.utwente.nl/bms/iebis/staff/amrit/devopsreport.pdf">http://www.utwente.nl/bms/iebis/staff/amrit/devopsreport.pdf</ext-link></bold>
  10. 10. Claps, G. G., R. B. Svensson, A. Aurum. On the Journey to Continuous Deployment: Technical and Social Challenges along the Way. – Information and Software Technology, Elsevier, Vol. <bold>57</bold>, 2015, pp. 21-31.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.07.009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.infsof.2014.07.009</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  11. 11. Angara, J., S. Prasad, S. Gutta. DevOps Product Line Engineering (DPLE): Where DevOps Meets Software Product Lines. – International Journal of Sciences and Research, Vol. <bold>72</bold>, 2016, No 11.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2016.11.35" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.21506/j.ponte.2016.11.35</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  12. 12. Test Automation Assessment and Implementation (Accessed on 24 October 2017). <bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://xbosoft.com/software-qa-consulting-services/test-automation-assessment/">https://xbosoft.com/software-qa-consulting-services/test-automation-assessment/</ext-link></bold>
  13. 13. Schur, M., A. Roth, A. Zeller. Mining Workflow Models from Web Applications. – IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. <bold>41</bold>, 2015, No 12, p. 1.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2015.2461542" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/TSE.2015.2461542</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  14. 14. Jumpstarting DevOps with Continuous Testing (Accessed on 24 October 2017). <bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.cognizant.com/content/dam/Cognizant_Dotcom/whitepapers/Jumpstarting-DevOps-with-Continuous-Testing-codex1719.pdf">https://www.cognizant.com/content/dam/Cognizant_Dotcom/whitepapers/Jumpstarting-DevOps-with-Continuous-Testing-codex1719.pdf</ext-link></bold>
  15. 15. Continuous Testing for IT Leaders (Accessed on 24 October 2017). <bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://alm.parasoft.com/continuoustestingbook">https://alm.parasoft.com/continuoustestingbook</ext-link></bold>
  16. 16. C a n n i z z o, F., R. C l u t t o n, R. R a m e s h. Pushing the Boundaries of Testing and Continuous Integration. – In: Proc. of Agile Conference (AGILE’08), Toronto, 2008, pp. 501-505.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/Agile.2008.31" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/Agile.2008.31</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  17. 17. Reich, C., B. Scharpf. Continuous Software Test Distributed Execution and Integrated into the Globus Toolkit. – In: 5th International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Timisoara, 2006, pp. 185-190.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPDC.2006.15" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/ISPDC.2006.15</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  18. 18. Saff, D., M. D. Ernst. Continuous Testing in Eclipse. – In: Proc. of 27th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’05), St. Louis, 18-20 May 2005, pp. 668-669.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/1062455.1062600" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1145/1062455.1062600</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  19. 19. Muthusamy, T., K. Seetharaman. A New Effective Test Case Prioritization for Regression Testing Based on Prioritization Algorithm. – International Journal of Applied Information Systems, Vol. <bold>6</bold>, 2014, No 7, pp. 21-26.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.5120/ijais14-451081" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5120/ijais14-451081</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  20. 20. Ramler, R., K. Wolfmaier. Economic Perspectives in Test Automation: Balancing Automated and Manual Testing with Opportunity Cost. – In: Proc. of International Workshop on Automation of Software Test, Shanghai, China, 23 May 2006.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/1138929.1138946" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1145/1138929.1138946</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  21. 21. Berner, S., R. Weber, R. K. Keller. Observations and Lessons Learned from Automated Testing. – In: Proc. of 27th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’05), St. Louis, MO, USA, 2005. pp. 571-579.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/1062455.1062556" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1145/1062455.1062556</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  22. 22. Process for Scoping and Planning Test Automation Projects (Accessed on 24 October 2017). <bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.stickyminds.com/sites/default/files/presentation/file/2013/07STRER_W8.pdf">https://www.stickyminds.com/sites/default/files/presentation/file/2013/07STRER_W8.pdf</ext-link></bold>
  23. 23. A Process for Scoping and Planning Test Automation Projects. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Software Test Analysis and Review. <bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.stickyminds.com/sites/default/files/presentation/file/2013/07STRER_W8.pdf">https://www.stickyminds.com/sites/default/files/presentation/file/2013/07STRER_W8.pdf</ext-link></bold>
  24. 24. GeethaDevasena, M. S., G. Gopu, M. L. Valarmathi. Automated and Optimized Software Test Suite Generation Technique for Structural Testing. – International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. <bold>26</bold>, 2016, No 1, pp. 1-13.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194016500017" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1142/S0218194016500017</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  25. 25. Runeson, P., M. Host. Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Case Study Research in Software Engineering. – Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. <bold>14</bold>, 2008, No 2, pp. 131-164.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  26. 26. Robinson, W. N., T. Deng, Z. Qi. Developer Behavior and Sentiment from Data Mining Open Source Repositories. – In: Proc. of 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’16), Koloa, HI, 2016, pp. 3729-3738.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.465" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/HICSS.2016.465</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  27. 27. Calefato, F., F. Lanubile. Affective Trust as a Predictor of Successful Collaboration in Distributed Software Projects. – In: Proc. of 1st International Workshop on Emotional Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion), IEEE/ACM, Austin, Texas, 2016, pp. 3-5.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/2897000.2897001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1145/2897000.2897001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  28. 28. Muhammad, U., J. Börstler, K. Petersen. An Effort Estimation Taxonomy for Agile Software Development. – Int. J. Soft. Eng. Knowl. Eng., Vol. <bold>27</bold>, 2017, No 4, 641.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194017500243" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1142/S0218194017500243</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  29. 29. Borissova, D., I. Mustakerov, D. Korsemov. Business Intelligence System via Group Decision Making. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. <bold>16</bold>, 2016, No 3, pp. 219-229.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/cait-2016-0045" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/cait-2016-0045</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  30. 30. Sgurev, V., S. Drangajov. Risk Estimation and Stochastic Control of Innovation Processes. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. <bold>14</bold>, 2014, No 1, pp. 3-10.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2014-0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/cait-2014-0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  31. 31. Haugen, N. C. An Empirical Study of Using Planning Poker for User Story Estimation. – In: Proc. of Agile Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2006.
  32. 32. Zahraoui, H., A. Mohammed, J. Idrissi. Adjusting Story Points Calculation in Scrum Effort &amp; Time Estimation. – In: Proc. of 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA’15), Rabat, Morocco, 2015, pp. 20-21.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/SITA.2015.7358400" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/SITA.2015.7358400</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  33. 33. Atlassian the Secrets Behind Story Points and Agile Estimation (Accessed on 30 November 2017). <bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.atlassian.com/agile/estimation">https://www.atlassian.com/agile/estimation</ext-link></bold>
  34. 34. An Introduction to Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis. Temasek Laboratories. National University of Singapore (Accessed on 21 November 2017). <bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.sentic.net/intro-to-concept-level-sentiment-analysis.pdf">http://www.sentic.net/intro-to-concept-level-sentiment-analysis.pdf</ext-link></bold>
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2020-0018 | Journal eISSN: 1314-4081 | Journal ISSN: 1311-9702
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 92
Submitted on: May 26, 2019
Accepted on: Mar 23, 2020
Published on: Jun 12, 2020
Published by: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 Jayasri Angara, Srinivas Prasad, Gutta Sridevi, published by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.