Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fuzzy Group Full Consistency Method for Weight Determination Cover

Fuzzy Group Full Consistency Method for Weight Determination

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. 1. Badi, I., A. Abdulshahed. Ranking the Libyan Airlines by Using Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). – Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, Vol. 2, 2019, No 1, pp. 1-14.<a href="https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta1901001b" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.31181/oresta1901001b</a>
  2. 2. Cao, Q., M. O. Esangbedo, S. Bai, C. O. Esangbedo. Grey SWARA-FUCOM Weighting Method for Contractor Selection MCDM Problem: A Case Study of Floating Solar Panel Energy System Installation. – Energies, Vol. 12, 2019, No 13.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/en12132481" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/en12132481</a>
  3. 3. Erol, I., S. Sencer, R. Sari. A New Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Framework for Measuring Sustainability Performance of a Supply Chain. – Ecological Economics, Vol. 70, 2011, No 6, pp. 1088-1100.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.001</a>
  4. 4. Fan, J. P., Y. J. Li, M. Q. Wu. Technology Selection Based on EDAS Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method. – IEEE Access, Vol. 7, pp. 58974-58980.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915345" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915345</a>
  5. 5. Fazlollahtabar, H., A. Smailbašić, Ž. Stević. FUCOM Method in Group Decision-Making: Selection of Forklift in a Warehouse. – Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, Vol. 2, 2019, No 1, pp. 49-65.
  6. 6. Guo, S., H. Zhao. Fuzzy Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method and Its Applications. – Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 121, 2017, pp. 23-31.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.010" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.010</a>
  7. 7. Ilieva, G. Decision Making Methods in Agent Based Modelling. – In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings 752, 2011, pp. 8-17.
  8. 8. Ilieva, G. Group Decision Analysis Algorithms with EDAS for Interval Fuzzy Sets. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 18, 2018, No 2, pp. 51-64.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2018-0027" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/cait-2018-0027</a>
  9. 9. Mardani, A., E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakuan, A. Jusoh, K. M. Nor, M. Khoshnoudi. A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Applications to Solve Energy Management Problems: Two Decades from 1995 to 2015. – Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 71, 2017, pp. 216-256.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.053" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.053</a>
  10. 10. Nagoor, Gani, A., S. N. MohamedAssarudeen. A New Operation on Triangular Fuzzy Number for Solving Fuzzy Linear Programming Problem. – Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 6, 2012, No 12, pp. 525-532.
  11. 11. Naz, S., M. Akram. Novel Decision-Making Approach Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Graph Theory. – Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 38, 2019, No 7, pp. 1-26.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0773-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s40314-019-0773-0</a>
  12. 12. Pamučar, D., M. Deveci, F. Canıtez, D. Bozanic. A Fuzzy Full Consistency Method-Dombi-Bonferroni Model for Prioritizing Transportation Demand Management Measures. – Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 87, 2020.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105952" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105952</a>
  13. 13. Pamučar, D., Ž.Stević, S. Sremac. New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM). – Symmetry, Vol. 10, 2018, No 9.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10090393" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/sym10090393</a>
  14. 14. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Criteria Importance Depending on Membership Degrees of Fuzzy Relations. – Compt. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci., Vol. 61, 2008, No 5, pp. 579-584.
  15. 15. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Multicriteria Decision Making Based on Fuzzy Relations. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 8, 2008, No 4, pp. 3-12.
  16. 16. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Multicriteria Decision Making by Fuzzy Relations and Weighting Functions for the Criteria. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 4, pp. 58-71.
  17. 17. Popchev, I., V. Peneva. A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Algorithm. – In: Proc of 10th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 19-24 July 1992, Taipei, Vol. II, pp. 11-16.
  18. 18. Radeva, I. Multicriteria Fuzzy Sets Application in Economic Clustering Problems. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 17, 2017, No 3, pp. 29-46.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/cait-2017-0028" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/cait-2017-0028</a>
  19. 19. Shakeel, M, S. Abdullah. Some Induced Interval-Valued Pythagorean Trapezoidal Fuzzy Averaging Aggregation Operators Based on Einstein Operations and Their Application in Group Decision-Making. – Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 38, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0858-9" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s40314-019-0858-9</a>
  20. 20. Sharaf, I. M. An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy TOPSIS Using the Extended Vertex Method for MAGDM. – SN Applied Sciences, Vol. 2, 2020.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1825-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s42452-019-1825-1</a>
  21. 21. Sharaf, I. M. TOPSIS with Similarity Measure for MADM Applied to Network Selection. – Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 37, 2018, No 4, pp. 4104-4121.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0556-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s40314-017-0556-4</a>
  22. 22. Stević, Z., N. Brković. A Novel Integrated FUCOM-MARCOS Model for Evaluation of Human Resources in a Transport Company. – Logistics, Vol. 4, 2020, No 1.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics4010004" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/logistics4010004</a>
  23. 23. Tabatabaei, M. H., M. Amiri, M. Ghahremanloo, M. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene. Hierarchical Decision-Making Using a new Mathematical Model Based on the Best-Worst Method. – International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, Vol. 14, 2019, No 6, pp. 669-684.<a href="https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2019.6.3675" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.15837/ijccc.2019.6.3675</a>
  24. 24. VanLaarhoven, P. J. M., W. Pedrycz. A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty’s Priority Theory. – Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 11, 1983, No 1-3, pp. 229-241.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7</a>
  25. 25. Wu, W. W., Y. T. Lee. Developing Global Managers’ Competencies Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL Method. – Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 32, 2007, No 2, pp. 499-507.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005</a>
  26. 26. Zhao, H., S. Guo. Selecting Green Supplier of Thermal Power Equipment by Using a Hybrid MCDM Method for Sustainability. – Sustainability, Vol. 6, 2014, No 1, pp. 217-235.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su6010217" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/su6010217</a>
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2020-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1314-4081 | Journal ISSN: 1311-9702
Language: English
Page range: 50 - 58
Submitted on: Mar 20, 2020
Accepted on: May 21, 2020
Published on: Jun 12, 2020
Published by: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 Galina Ilieva, published by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.