Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Group Decision Making in Evaluation and Ranking of Students by Extended Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique

Cybernetics and Information Technologies
Volume 19 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Sep 2019

References

  1. 1. Gutierrez, R. T. Understanding the Role of Digital Commons in the Web; The Making of HTML5. – Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 35, 2018, pp. 1438-1449.10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Ringe, S., R. Kedia, A. Poddar, S. Patel. HTML5 Based Virtual Whiteboard for Real Time Interaction. – Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 49, 2015, pp. 170-177.10.1016/j.procs.2015.04.241
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Halachev, P., I. Mustakerov. Evaluation of the Time Needed for e-Learning Course Developing. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 3, pp. 86-95.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Mustakerov, I., D. Borissova. A Framework for Development of e-Learning System for Computer Programming: Application in the C Programming Language. – Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, Vol. 13, 2017, No 2, pp. 89-101.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Mustakerov, I., D. Borissova. A Conceptual Approach for Development of Educational Web-Based e-Testing System. – Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, 2011, No 11, pp. 14060-14064.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.214
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Tuparov, G., D. Keremedchiev, D. Tuparova, M. Stoyanova. Gamification and Educational Computer Games in Open Source Learning Management Systems as a Part of Assessment. – In: Proc. of 17th Int. Conf. Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET’18), Olhao, 2018, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/ITHET.2018.8424768.10.1109/ITHET.2018.8424768
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Borissova, D., I. Mustakerov. e-Learning Tool for Visualization of Shortest Paths Algorithms. – Trends Journal of Sciences Research, Vol. 2, 2015, No 3, pp. 84-89.10.31586/InformationProcesses.0203.01
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Mardani, A., A. Jusoh, K. MD Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan, A. Valipour. Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques and Their Applications – A Review of the Literature from 2000 to 2014. – Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Vol. 28, 2015, No 1, pp. 516-571.10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Lee, L., R. Anderson. A Comparison of Compensatory and Non-Compensatory Decision Making Strategies in IT Project Portfolio Management. – International Research Workshop on IT Project Management 2009. 9. 2009. http://aisel.aisnet.org/irwitpm2009/9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. Keeney, R. L., H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. – Cambridge University Press, 1993. 592 p.10.1017/CBO9781139174084
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Barzilai, J. Preference Function Modelling: The Mathematical Foundations of Decision Theory, in Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer. – International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 142, 2010, pp. 57-86.10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Algorithms. – Compt. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci., Vol. 63, 2010, No 7, pp. 979-992.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Multicriteria Decision Making by Fuzzy Relations and Weighting Functions for the Criteria. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 4, pp. 58-71.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. La Red Martinez, D. L., J. C. Acosta. Review of Modeling Preferences for Decision Models. – European Scientific Journal, Vol. 11, 2015, No 36, pp. 1-18.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Ilieva, G. Group Decision Analysis Algorithms with EDAS for Interval Fuzzy Sets. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 18, 2018, No 2, pp. 51-64.10.2478/cait-2018-0027
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. Kabakchieva, D. Predicting Student Performance by Using Data Mining Methods for Classification. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 13, 2013, No 1, pp. 61-72.10.2478/cait-2013-0006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. Radeva, I. Multi-Criteria Models for Clusters Design. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 13, 2013, No 1, pp. 18-33.10.2478/cait-2013-0003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Tzeng, G-H., J-J. Huang. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. – CRC Press, 2011. 352 p.10.1201/b11032
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Triantaphyllou, E. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. In: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. – Applied Optimization, Vol. 44, 2000, Springer, Boston, MA, 320 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_210.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_2
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Olson, D. L. Smart. – In: Decision Aids for Selection Problems. Springer Series in Operations Research, 1996, pp 34-48.10.1007/978-1-4612-3982-6_4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. Opricovic, S., G.-H. Tzeng. Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. – European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 156, 2004, No 2, pp. 445-455.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Sirisawat, P., T. Kiatcharoenpol. Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approaches to Prioritizing Solutions for Reverse Logistics Barriers. – Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 117, 2018, pp. 303-318.10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Abdel-Baset, M., V. Chang, A. Gamal, F. Smarandache. An Integrated Neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR Method for Achieving Sustainable Supplier Selection: A Case Study in Importing Field. – Computers in Industry, Vol. 106, 2019, pp. 94-110.10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. Korsemov, D., D. Borissova, I. Mustakerov. Combinatorial Optimization Model for Group Decision-Making. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 18, 2018, No 2, pp. 65-73.10.2478/cait-2018-0028
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. Stancheva, N., A. Stoyanova-Doycheva, S. Stoyanov, I. Popchev, V. Ivanova. An Environment for Automatic Test Generation. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 17, 2017, No 2, pp. 183-196.10.1515/cait-2017-0025
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Stancheva, N., A. Stoyanova-Doycheva, S. Stoyanov, I. Popchev, V. Ivanova. A Model for Generation of Test Questions. – Compt. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci., Vol. 70, 2017, No 5, pp. 619-630.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2019-0025 | Journal eISSN: 1314-4081 | Journal ISSN: 1311-9702
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 56
Submitted on: May 7, 2019
Accepted on: Jul 24, 2019
Published on: Sep 26, 2019
Published by: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Students’ assessments,
ranking,
web programming,
group decision making
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Information technology

© 2019 Daniela Borissova, Delyan Keremedchiev, published by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 19 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)Next article