References
- 1. M. Wooldridge, Artificial Intelligence requires more than deep learning - but what, exactly?, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 289, p. 103386, 2020.
- 2. S. Lalmuanawma, J. Hussain, and L. Chhakchhuak, Applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence for Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: a review, Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 139, pp. 110059, 6, 2020.
- 3. V. C. Müller and N. Bostrom, Future progress in artificial intelligence: a survey of expert opinion, in Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence, vol. 376 of Synth. Libr., pp. 553–570, Springer, [Cham], 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1_33
- 4. K. T. Mengistu and F. Rudzicz, Comparing humans and automatic speech recognition systems in recognizing dysarthric speech, in Advances in artificial intelligence, vol. 6657 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., pp. 291–300, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011.
- 5. C. Li, Y. Xing, F. He, and D. Cheng, A strategic learning algorithm for state-based games, Automatica J. IFAC, vol. 113, pp. 108615, 9, 2020.
- 6. Z. M. Fadlullah, B. Mao, F. Tang, and N. Kato, Value iteration architecture based deep learning for intelligent routing exploiting heterogeneous computing platforms, IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 939–950, 2019.10.1109/TC.2018.2874483
- 7. R. E. Stern, S. Cui, M. L. Delle Monache, R. Bhadani, M. Bunting, M. Churchill, N. Hamilton, R. Haulcy, H. Pohlmann, F. Wu, B. Piccoli, B. Seibold, J. Sprinkle, and D. B. Work, Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: Field experiments, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 89, pp. 205 – 221, 2018.10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.005
- 8. S. Mishra, A machine learning framework for data driven acceleration of computations of differential equations, Math. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 118–146, 2019.10.3934/Mine.2018.1.118
- 9. K. O. Lye, S. Mishra, and D. Ray, Deep learning observables in computational fluid dynamics, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 410, pp. 109339, 26, 2020.
- 10. D. Zhang, L. Guo, and G. E. Karniadakis, Learning in modal space: solving time-dependent stochastic PDEs using physics-informed neural networks, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. A639–A665, 2020.10.1137/19M1260141
- 11. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019.10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
- 12. N. Discacciati, J. S. Hesthaven, and D. Ray, Controlling oscillations in high-order discontinuous Galerkin schemes using artificial viscosity tuned by neural networks, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 409, pp. 109304, 30, 2020.
- 13. D. Ray and J. S. Hesthaven, Detecting troubled-cells on two-dimensional unstructured grids using a neural network, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 397, pp. 108845, 31, 2019.
- 14. J. Magiera, D. Ray, J. S. Hesthaven, and C. Rohde, Constraint-aware neural networks for Riemann problems, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 409, pp. 109345, 27, 2020.
- 15. D. Ray and J. S. Hesthaven, An artificial neural network as a troubled-cell indicator, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 367, pp. 166–191, 2018.10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.029
- 16. M. Herty, T. Trimborn, and G. Visconti, Mean-field and kinetic descriptions of neural differential equations, Foundations of Data Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 271–298, 2022.10.3934/fods.2022007
- 17. J. Crevat, Mean-field limit of a spatially-extended Fitzhugh-Nagumo neural network, Kinet. Relat. Models, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1329–1358, 2019.
- 18. S. Mei, A. Montanari, and P.-M. Nguyen, A mean field view of the landscape of two-layer neural networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 115, no. 33, pp. E7665–E7671, 2018.10.1073/pnas.1806579115609989830054315
- 19. J. Sirignano and K. Spiliopoulos, Mean field analysis of neural networks: a law of large numbers, SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 725–752, 2020.10.1137/18M1192184
- 20. J. Sirignano and K. Spiliopoulos, Mean field analysis of neural networks: a central limit theorem, Stochastic Process. Appl., vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 1820–1852, 2020.
- 21. F. Baccelli and T. Taillefumier, Replica-mean-field limits for intensity-based neural networks, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1756–1797, 2019.
- 22. T. Trimborn, S. Gerster, and G. Visconti, Spectral methods to study the robustness of residual neural networks with infinite layers, Foundations of Data Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 257–278, 2020.
- 23. E. Cristiani, B. Piccoli, and A. Tosin, Multiscale Modeling of Pedestrian Dynamics. Springer, Cham, 2014.10.1007/978-3-319-06620-2
- 24. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 770–778, 2015.
- 25. E. Haber, F. Lucka, and L. Ruthotto, Never look back - A modified EnKF method and its application to the training of neural networks without back propagation. Preprint arXiv:1805.08034, 2018.
- 26. N. B. Kovachki and A. M. Stuart, Ensemble Kalman inversion: a derivative-free technique for machine learning tasks, Inverse Probl., vol. 35, no. 9, p. 095005, 2019.
- 27. K. Watanabe and S. G. Tzafestas, Learning algorithms for neural networks with the Kalman filters, J. Intell. Robot. Syst., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305–319, 1990.10.1007/BF00439421
- 28. A. Yegenoglu, S. Diaz, K. Krajsek, and M. Herty, Ensemble Kalman filter optimizing deep neural networks, in Conference on Machine Learning, Optimization and Data Science, vol. 12514, 2020.
- 29. K. Janocha and W. M. Czarnecki, On loss functions for deep neural networks in classification, Schedae Informaticae, vol. 2016, no. Volume 25, 2017.
- 30. T. Q. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, and D. K. Duvenaud, Neural ordinary differential equations, in Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 6571–6583, 2018.
- 31. H. Lin and S. Jegelka, Resnet with one-neuron hidden layers is a universal approximator, p. 6172–6181, Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2018.
- 32. Y. Lu and J. Lu, A universal approximation theorem of deep neural networks for expressing probability distributions, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. F. Balcan, and H. Lin, eds.), vol. 33, pp. 3094–3105, Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
- 33. P. Kidger and T. Lyons, Universal approximation with deep narrow networks, in Conference on Learning Theory, 2020.
- 34. C. Gebhardt, T. Trimborn, F. Weber, A. Bezold, C. Broeckmann, and M. Herty, Simplified ResNet approach for data driven prediction of microstructure-fatigue relationship, Mechanics of Materials, vol. 151, p. 103625, 2020.
- 35. K. Bobzin, W. Wietheger, H. Heinemann, S. Dokhanchi, M. Rom, and G. Visconti, Prediction of particle properties in plasma spraying based on machine learning, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2021.10.1007/s11666-021-01239-2
- 36. L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli, and G. Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures. Lectures in Mathematics ETH Z ˜A¼rich, Birkh ˜A¤user, 2. ed ed., 2008.
- 37. C. Villani, Optimal Transport: Old and New. Springer-Verlag, 2009.10.1007/978-3-540-71050-9
- 38. F. Golse, On the dynamics of large particle systems in the mean field limit, in Macroscopic and large scale phenomena: coarse graining, mean field limits and ergodicity, pp. 1–144, Springer, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-26883-5_1
- 39. J. M. Coron, Control and nonlinearity. American Mathematical Society, 2007.
- 40. E. Zuazua, Controllability and observability of partial differential equations: Some results and open problems, vol. 3 of Handbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations, pp. 527–621, North-Holland, 2007.
- 41. N. Fournier and A. Guillin, On the rate of convergence in wasserstein distance of the empirical measure, Probability Theory and Related Fields, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 707–738, 2015.10.1007/s00440-014-0583-7
- 42. E. Boissard, Simple bounds for convergence of empirical and occupation measures in 1-wasserstain distance, Electronic Journal of Probability, vol. 16, pp. 2296–2333, 2011.
- 43. J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization. Springer New York, 2010.
- 44. I. Cravero, G. Puppo, M. Semplice, and G. Visconti, CWENO: uniformly accurate reconstructions for balance laws, Math. Comp., vol. 87, no. 312, pp. 1689–1719, 2018.
- 45. G.-S. Jiang and C.-W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 126, pp. 202–228, 1996.10.1006/jcph.1996.0130