References
- 1. S. Supek and C. J. Aine, Magnetoencephalography. From signals to dynamic cortical networks. Springer, 2014.
- 2. G. Sudre, L. Parkkonen, E. Bock, S. Baillet, W. Wang, and D. J. Weber, rtMEG: a real-time software interface for magnetoencephalography, Computational intelligence and neuroscience, vol. 2011, p. 11, 2011.
- 3. J. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Statistical and computational inverse problems, vol. 160. Springer, 2005.
- 4. C. Del Gratta, V. Pizzella, F. Tecchio, and G. L. Romani, Magnetoencephalography - A noninvasive brain imaging method with 1 ms time resolution, Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 64, no. 12, p. 1759, 2001.
- 5. M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R. J. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila, and O. V. Lounasmaa, Magnetoencephalography: theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain, Reviews of modern Physics, vol. 65, no. 2, p. 413, 1993.
- 6. R. Kress, L. Kühn, and R. Potthast, Reconstruction of a current distribution from its magnetic field, Inverse Problems, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 1127, 2002.
- 7. J. Cantarella, D. De Turck, and H. Gluck, The Biot-Savart operator for application to knot theory, fluid dynamics, and plasma physics, Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 42, pp. 876–905, 2001.
- 8. S. Baillet, J. C. Mosher, and R. M. Leahy, Electromagnetic brain mapping, IEEE Signal processing magazine, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 14–30, 2001.
- 9. A. Pascarella and A. Sorrentino, Statistical approaches to the inverse problem. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2011.
- 10. A. Gramfort, M. Luessi, E. Larson, D. A. Engemann, D. Strohmeier, C. Brodbeck, L. Parkkonen, and M. S. Hämäläinen, MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data, Neuroimage, vol. 86, pp. 446–460, 2014.
- 11. A. Gramfort, M. Kowalski, and M. Hämäläinen, Mixed-norm estimates for the M/EEG inverse problem using accelerated gradient methods, Physics in medicine and biology, vol. 57, no. 7, p. 1937, 2012.
- 12. M. Fornasier and F. Pitolli, Adaptive iterative thresholding algorithms for magnetoencephalography (MEG), Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 386–395, 2008.
- 13. S. Haufe, V. V. Nikulin, A. Ziehe, K.-R. Müller, and G. Nolte, Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction, NeuroImage, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 726–738, 2008.
- 14. F. Pitolli and G. Bretti, An iterative algorithm with joint sparsity constraints for magnetic tomography, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, vol. 5862, pp. 316–328, 2010.
- 15. M. Sato, T. Yoshioka, S. Kajihara, K. Toyama, N. Goda, K. Doya, and M. Kawato, Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for MEG inverse problem, NeuroImage, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 806–826, 2004.
- 16. D. Calvetti, A. Pascarella, F. Pitolli, E. Somersalo, and B. Vantaggi, A hierarchical Krylov–Bayes iterative inverse solver for MEG with physiological preconditioning, Inverse Problems, vol. 31, no. 12, p. 125005, 2015.
- 17. J. C. Mosher and R. M. Leahy, Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC, IEEE Transactions on signal processing, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 332–340, 1999.
- 18. A. Sorrentino, L. Parkkonen, A. Pascarella, C. Campi, and M. Piana, Dynamical MEG source modeling with multi-target Bayesian filtering, Human brain mapping, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1911–1921, 2009.
- 19. S. Sommariva and A. Sorrentino, Sequential Monte Carlo samplers for semi-linear inverse problems and application to magnetoencephalography, Inverse Problems, vol. 30, no. 11, p. 114020, 2014.
- 20. D. L. Donoho, Superresolution via sparsity constraints, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1309–1331, 1992.
- 21. V. Bruni, F. Pitolli, and C. Pocci, A comparison of iterative thresholding algorithms for the MEG inverse problem, IMACS Series in Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 19, pp. 21–30, 2016.
- 22. F. Pitolli and C. Pocci, Neuroelectric source localization by random spatial sampling, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 296, pp. 237–246, 2016.
- 23. B. D. Van Veen, W. Van Drongelen, M. Yuchtman, and A. Suzuki, Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering, IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 867–880, 1997.
- 24. K. Sekihara and S. S. Nagarajan, Adaptive spatial filters for electromagnetic brain imaging. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
- 25. M. A. Quraan, Characterization of brain dynamics using beamformer techniques: advantages and limitations. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2011.
- 26. D. L. Collins, A. P. Zijdenbos, V. Kollokian, J. G. Sled, N. J. Kabani, C. J. Holmes, and A. C. Evans, Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom, Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 463–468, 1998.
- 27. R. Oostenveld, P. Fries, E. Maris, and J.-M. Schoffelen, FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data, Computational intelligence and neuroscience, vol. 2011, 2010.
- 28. V. Pizzella, S. Della Penna, C. Del Gratta, and G. L. Romani, SQUID systems for biomagnetic imaging, Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 14, no. 7, p. R79, 2001.
- 29. G. Nolte, The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors, Physics in medicine and biology, vol. 48, no. 22, p. 3637, 2003.
- 30. N. Tzourio-Mazoyer, B. Landeau, D. Papathanassiou, F. Crivello, O. Etard, N. Delcroix, B. Mazoyer, and M. Joliot, Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain, Neuroimage, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 273–289, 2002.
- 31. D. Calvetti, B. Wodlinger, D. M. Durand, and E. Somersalo, Hierarchical beamformer and cross-talk reduction in electroneurography, Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 056002, 2011.