Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Optimisation and comparison of three PCR procedures for molecular identification of Taenia solium Cover

Optimisation and comparison of three PCR procedures for molecular identification of Taenia solium

Journal of Veterinary Research
Volume 57 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)
By: ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2013
References

References

  1. 1. Deplazes P., Grimm F., Sydler T., Tanner I., Kapel C.M.O.L: Experimental alveolar echinococcosis in pigs, lesion development and serological follow up. Vet Parasitol 2005,130, 213-222.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Garcia H.H., Gonzalez A.E., Evans C.A., Gilman R.H., and the Cysticercosis Working Group in Peru:cysticercosis. Lancet 2003, 362, 547-556.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Garcia H.H., Del Brutto O.H., and the Cysticercosis Working Group in Peru: Neurocysticercosis: updated concepts about an old disease. Lancet Neurol 2005, 4, 653-661.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Gomes A.B., Soares K.A., Bueno F.C., Espindola N.M., Tha A.H., Maia A.A.M., Peralta R II, S., Vaz A.J.: Comparative evaluation of different immunoassays for the detection ofcysticercosis in swine with low parasite burden. Memrias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2007, 102, 725-731.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Gonzalez L.M., Montero E., Harrison L.J.S., Parkhouse R.M.E, Garate T.: Differential diagnosis ofandinfection by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38, 737-744.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Gonzalez L.M., Montero E., Puente Lopez-Velez R., Hernandez M., Sciutto E., Harrison L.J.S., Parkhouse R.M.E., Garate T.: PCR tools for the differential diagnosis ofandtaeniasis/cysticercosis from different geographical locations. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002, 42, 243-249.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Harrington A.T., Creutzfeldt C.J., SenGupta D.J., Hoogestraat D.R., Zunt J.R., Cookson B.T.: Diagnosis of neurocysticercosis by detection ofDNA using a global DNA screening platform. Clin Infect Dis 2009, 48, 86-90.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Jardim E.A.G.V., Linhares G.F.C., Torres F.A.G., Araujo J.L.B., Barbosa S.M.: Specific discrimination betweenandby one step PCR assay and duplex-PCR. Ciencia Rural, Santa Maria 2006, 36, 166-172.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Kędra A.H., Tkacz W.W., Świderski Z., Pawłowski Z.: Intraspecific variability among NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 sequences of. Parasitol Int 2001, 50, 145-148.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Karamon J., Sroka J., Cencek T.: The first detection ofin slaughtered pigs in Poland. Vet Parasitol 2012, 185, 327-329.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Mayta H., Talley A., Gilman R.H., Jimenez J., Verastegui M., Ruiz M., Garcia H.H., Gonzalez A.E.: Differentiatingandinfections by simple hematoxylin- eosin staining and PCR restriction enzyme analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38, 133-137.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. OIE (Office International des Epizooties), Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, World Organisation for Animal Health, Paris, 2008, pp. 1216-1226.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Pawłowski Z.S.: Control of neurocysticercosis by routine medical and veterinary services. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2008, 102, 228-232.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Pawłowski Z., Allan J., Sarti E.: Control oftaeniasis/cysticercosis: from research towards implementation. Int J Parasitol 2005, 35, 1221-1232.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Praet N., Verweij J.J., Mwape K.E., Phiri I.K., Muma J.B., Zulu G., van Lieshout L., Rodriguez-Hidalgo R., Benitez-Ortiz W., Dorny P., Gabrie S.: Bayesian modelling to estimate the test characteristics of coprology, coproantigen ELISA and a novel real-time PCR for the diagnosis of taeniasis. Trop Med Int Health 2013, 18, 608-614.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Sreedevi C., Hafeez M., Kumar P.A., Rayulu V.C., Subramanyam K.V., Sudhakar K.: PCR test for detectingcysticercosis in pig carcasses. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012, 44, 95-99.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Waloch M., Sobolewska A., Dzbeński T.H.: Evaluation of epidemiological situation of cestode infections in Poland in the years 1997-2006 on the basis of data from sanepid stations Przegl Epidemiol 2010, 64, 533-536.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Yamasaki H., Allan J.C., Sato M.O., Nakao M., Sako Y., Nakaya K., Qui D., Mamuti W., Craig P.S., Ito A.: DNA differential diagnosis of taeniosis and cysticercosis by multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2004, 42, 548-553.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bvip-2013-0088 | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608 (formerly 2300-3235)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 507 - 512
Published on: Dec 31, 2013
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Taenia solium,
cysticercosis,
PCR,
identification
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Molecular biology,
Microbiology and virology,
Life sciences, other,
Medicine,
Veterinary medicine

© 2013 Jacek Karamon, Jacek Sroka, Tomasz Cencek, Mirosław Różycki, Ewa Chmurzyńska, Ewa Bilska-Zając, Jolanta Zdybel, Piotr Nowak, Jolanta Kędzierska, Piotr Dębiak, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 57 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)
Previous article
Next article