Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
ERIC-based differentiation and antimicrobial susceptibility of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 isolated from animals serologically positive and negative for brucellosis Cover

ERIC-based differentiation and antimicrobial susceptibility of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 isolated from animals serologically positive and negative for brucellosis

Journal of Veterinary Research
Volume 57 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)
By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2013
References

References

  1. 1. Abdel-Haq N.M., Papadopol R., Asmar B.I., Brown W.J.: Antibiotic susceptibilities ofrecovered from children over a 12-year period. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006, 27, 449-452.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Baumgartner A., Kűffer M., Suter D., Jemmi T., Rohner P.: Antimicrobial resistance ofstrains from human patients, pigs and retail pork in Switzerland. Int J Food Microbiol 2007, 115, 110-114.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Caetano-Anolles G.: Amplifying DNA with arbitrary oligonucleotide primers. PCR Meth Appl 1993, 3, 85-94.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Falcao J.P., Falcao D.P., Pitondo-Silva A., Malaspina A.C., Brocchi M.: Molecular typing and virulence markers ofstrains from human, animal and food origins isolated between 1968 and 2000 in Brazil. J Med Microbiol 2006, 55, 1539-1548.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Garin-Bastuji B., Hummel N., Gerbier G., Cau C., Pouillot R., Da Costa M., Fontaine J.J.: Nonspecific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses ofO:9. Vet Microbiol 1999, 66, 223-233.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Gerbier G., Garin-Bastuji B., Pouillot R., Very P., Cau C., Berr V., Dufour B., Moutou F.: False positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis: evidence of the role ofserotype O:9 in a field trial. Vet Res 1997, 28, 375-383.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Grattarola C., Gennero M.S., Zoppi S., Bergagna S., Chiavacci L., Dondo A.:and its role in bovine brucellosis monitoring: a statistical analysis. Epidémiol Santé Anim 2006, 50, 153-155.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Hulton C.S.J., Higgins C.F., Sharp P.M.: ERIC sequences: a novel family of repetitive elements in the genomes of,and other enterobacteria. Mol Microbiol 1991, 5, 825-834.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Hunter P.R., Gaston M.A.: Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson’s index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol 1988, 26, 2465-2466.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Instruction No. 401/BB-16/2010 of the Chief Veterinary Officer, Warsaw, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Kechagia N., Nicolaou C., Ioannidou V., Kourti E., Ioannidis A., Legakis N.J., Chatzipanagiotou S.: Detection of chromosomal and plasmid - encoded virulence determinants inand otherspp. isolated from food animals in Greece. Int J Food Microbiol 2007, 118, 326-331.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Kot B., Rainko D.: Antibiotic resistance and β-lactamases ofisolated from pigs in Poland. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2009, 53, 603-607.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Mayrhofer S., Paulsen P., Smulders F.J., Hilbert F.: Antimicrobial resistance profile of five major food-borne pathogens isolated from beef, pork and poultry. Int J Food Microbiol 2004, 97, 23-29.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Nielsen K., Smith P., Widdison J., Gall D., Kelly L., Kelly W., Nicoletti P.: Serological relationship between cattle exposed to,O:9 andO:157:H7. Vet Microbiol 2004, 100, 25-30.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. PN-EN ISO 20776-1:2007: Clinical laboratory testing anddiagnostic test systems - Susceptibility testing of infectious agents and evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Rastawicki W., Gierczyński R., Jagielski M., Kałużewski S., Jeljaszewicz J.: Susceptibility of Polish clinical strains ofserotype O3 to antibiotics. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000, 13, 297-300.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Riber U., Jungersen G.: Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections withfromserotype O:9 in pigs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2007, 116, 13-25.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Sachdeva P., Virdi J.S.: Repetitive elements sequence (REP/ERIC)-PCR based genotyping of clinical and environmental strains ofbiotype 1A reveal existence of limited number of clonal groups. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004, 240, 193-201.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Biological Hazard (BIOHAZ) on monitoring and identification of human enteropathogenicspp. EFSA J 2007, 595, 1-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Scientific Report of EFSA and ECDC. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2010. EFSA J 2012, 3, 2597.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Simonova J., Borilova G., Steinhauserova I.: Occurrence of pathogenic strains ofin pigs and their antimicrobial resistance. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2008, 52, 39-43.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Szulowski K., Iwaniak W., Weiner M., Złotnicka J., Szymajda M., Zaręba Z., Czępińska H.: Diagnosis and epidemiological condition of bovine brucellosis in Poland. Med Weter 2012, 68, 110-113.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Tenover F.C., Arbeit R.D., Goering R.V., Mickelsen P.A., Murray B.E., Persing D.H., Swaminathan B.: Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995, 33, 2233-2239.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Versalovic J., Koeuth T., Lupski J.R.: Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences inand application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1991, 19, 6823-6831.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Wauters G., Kandolo K., Jenssens M.: Revised biogrouping scheme of. Contrib Microbiol Immunol 1987, 9, 14-21.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Weiner M., Szulowski K., Iwaniak W.: Porcine brucellosis - evidence of the role ofO:9 in occurrence of false positive serological reactions. Pol J Vet Sci 2013, 16, 129-130.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Weiner M., Szulowski K., Iwaniak W., Złotnicka J.: Genotypic markers ofO:9 isolated from cows positive in serological examination for bovine brucellosis. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy, 2012, 56, 479-482.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Weynants V., Tibor A., Denoel P.A., Saegerman C., Godfroid J., Thiange P., Letesson J.J.: Infection of cattle withO:9 a cause of the false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis diagnostic tests. Vet Microbiol 1996, 48, 101-112.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Wojciech Ł., Staroniewicz Z., Jakubczak A., Ugorski M.: Typing ofisolates by ITS profiling, REP- and ERIC-PCR. J Vet Med B 2004, 51, 238-244.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Woods C.R., Versalovic J., Koeuth T., Lupski J.R.: Whole-cell repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction allows rapid assessment of clonal relationships of bacterial isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1993, 31, 1927-1931.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bvip-2013-0086 | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608 (formerly 2300-3235)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 493 - 498
Published on: Dec 31, 2013
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
brucellosis,
false positive serological results,
MIC,
Yersinia enterocolitica O:9
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Molecular biology,
Microbiology and virology,
Life sciences, other,
Medicine,
Veterinary medicine

© 2013 Marcin Weiner, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 57 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)
Previous article
Next article