Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effectiveness of obstetric procedures in miniature dogs Cover

Effectiveness of obstetric procedures in miniature dogs

By: Andrzej Max and  Piotr Jurka  
Open Access
|Sep 2013

References

  1. 1. Bergström A., Nødtvedt A., Lagerstedt A.S., Egenvall A.: Incidence and breed predilection for dystocia and risk factors for caesarean section in a Swedish population of insured dogs. Vet Surg 2006, 35, 786-791.10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00223.x17187641
  2. 2. Borge K.S., Tønnessen R., Nødtvedt A., Indrebø A.: Litter size at birth in purebred dogs-a retrospective study of 224 breeds. Theriogenology 2011, 75, 911-919.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.10.03421196028
  3. 3. Darvelid A.W., Linde-Forsberg C.: Dystocia in the bitch: A retrospective study of 182 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1994, 35, 402-407.10.1111/j.1748-5827.1994.tb03863.x
  4. 4. Evans K.M., Adams V.J.: Proportion of litters of purebred dogs born by caesarean section. J Small Anim Pract 2010, 51, 113-118.10.1111/j.1748-5827.2009.00902.x20136998
  5. 5. Funkquist P.M., Nyman G.C., Löfgren A.J., Fahlbrink E.M.: Use of propofol-isoflurane as an anesthetic regimen for cesarean section in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997, 211, 313-317.
  6. 6. Groppetti D., Pecile A., Del Carro A.P., Copley K., Minero M., Cremonesi F.: Evaluation of newborn canine viability by means of umbilical vein lactate measurement, apgar score and uterine tocodynamometry. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 1187-1196.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.05.02020615542
  7. 7. Johnston S.D., Root Kustritz M.V., Olson P.N.S.: Canine and Feline Theriogenology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 2001 p. 112.
  8. 8. Linde Forsberg C., Persson G.: A survey of dystocia in the Boxer breed. Acta Vet Scand 2007, 49, 8.10.1186/1751-0147-49-8183910317376241
  9. 9. Moon P.F., Erb H.N., Ludders J.W., Gleed R.D., Pascoe P.J.: Perioperative management and mortality rates of dogs undergoing cesarean section in the United States and Canada. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998, 213, 365-369.
  10. 10. Münnich A., Küchenmeister U.: Dystocia in numbers - Evidence-based parameters for intervention in the dog: Causes for dystocia and treatment recommendations. Reprod Domest Anim 2009, 44 (Suppl. 2), 141-147.10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01405.x19754554
  11. 11. Purohit G.N., Gaur M.: Dystocia and its management in the bitch and queen: a review. J Canine Develop Res 2004, 4, 90-100.
  12. 12. Reichler I.M., Michel E.: Dystocia: recognition and management. Europ J Comp Anim Pract 2009, 19, 165-173.10.1002/cav.259
  13. 13. Rosset E., Buff S.: Interest of elective caesarean section on neonates’ survival rate. Proc 6th Intern Symp on Canine and Feline Reprod, Vienna, Austria 2008, pp. 23-24.
  14. 14. Smith F.O.: Guide to emergency interception during parturition in the dog and cat. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012, 42, 489-499.10.1016/j.cvsm.2012.02.00122482814
  15. 15. Stengel B.: Untersuchungen über Auftreten und Verlauf von Geburtsstörungen bei der Hündin. Eine Retrospektive Studie über 648 Fälle. Vet Med Diss, Gynäkologische und Ambulatorische Tierklinik, München 1997.
  16. 16. Traas A.M.: Surgical management of canine and feline dystocia. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 337-342. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.01418495232
Language: English
Page range: 419 - 423
Published on: Sep 27, 2013
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2013 Andrzej Max, Piotr Jurka, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.