Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Algorithmic Awareness and Digital Responsibility: The Role of Platform Trust and Digital Literacy Cover

Algorithmic Awareness and Digital Responsibility: The Role of Platform Trust and Digital Literacy

By:  and    
Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Acquisti, A., John, L. K., & Loewenstein, G. (2013). What Is Privacy Worth? The Journal of Legal Studies, 42(2), 249-274. https://doi.org/10.1086/671754
  2. Angelelli, M., Ciavolino, E., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Aria, M. (2025). Conceptual structure and thematic evolution in partial least squares structural equation modeling research. Quality & Quantity, 59(3), 2753-2798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02071-4
  3. Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to be Profiled Online for Personalization1. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148715
  4. Barišić, A. F., Pejić Bach, M., & Miloloža, I. (2018). Human resources information systems: Transactional and strategic paradigm. ENTRENOVA – Enterprise Research Innovation Conference Proceedings, 4, 224–230.
  5. Bashir, I. (2020). Mastering Blockchain: A deep dive into distributed ledgers, consensus protocols, smart contracts, DApps, cryptocurrencies, Ethereum, and more. Packt Publishing Ltd.
  6. Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.587
  7. Beldad, A., de Jong, M., & Steehouder, M. (2010). How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 857-869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.013
  8. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  9. Benthall, S., & Cummings, R. (2024). Integrating Differential Privacy and Contextual Integrity. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Science and Law, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3614407.3643702
  10. Binns, R., Van Kleek, M., Veale, M., Lyngs, U., Zhao, J., & Shadbolt, N. (2018). ‘It’s Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage’. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173951
  11. Bozdag, E. (2013). Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology, 15(3), 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6
  12. Bucher, T. (2018). If... Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford University Press.
  13. Calo, R. (2017). Artificial intelligence policy: A primer and roadmap. U.C. Davis Law Review, 51(2), 399–435.
  14. Campbell, H. A., & Bellar, W. (2022). Digital religion. Taylor & Francis Group.
  15. Caragay, E., Xiong, K., Zong, J., & Jackson, D. (2024). Beyond Dark Patterns: A Concept-Based Framework for Ethical Software Design. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642781
  16. Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080
  17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  18. Collins, H. (2023). Relational and associational justice in work. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 24(1), 26-48. https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2023-0004
  19. Colonna, L. (2023). Addressing the Responsibility Gap in Data Protection by Design: Towards a More Future-oriented, Relational, and Distributed Approach. Tilburg Law Review, 27(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.274
  20. Cooper, A. F., Moss, E., Laufer, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (2022). Accountability in an Algorithmic Society: Relationality, Responsibility, and Robustness in Machine Learning. 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency, 864-876. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533150
  21. Dencik, L., Hintz, A., Redden, J., & Treré, E. (2025). Collectivity in data governance and data justice. Information, Communication & Society, 28(6), 943-950. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2025.2478096
  22. Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the ACM, 59(2), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2844110
  23. Dolata, M., & Schwabe, G. (2024). Towards the Socio-Algorithmic Construction of Fairness: The Case of Automatic Price-Surging in Ride-Hailing. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2210887
  24. Durán, J. M., & Pozzi, G. (2025). Trust and trustworthiness in AI. Philosophy & Technology, 38(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00843-2
  25. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  26. European Commission. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
  27. European Commission. (2022a). Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/europes-digital-decade
  28. European Commission. (2022b). Digital Markets Act (DMA). https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj
  29. European Commission. (2022c). Digital Services Act (DSA). https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj
  30. European Commission. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Act. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/
  31. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  32. Floridi, L. (2018). Soft ethics, the governance of the digital and the General Data Protection Regulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180081. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0081
  33. Floridi, L. (2023). The ethics of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883098.001.0001
  34. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  35. Gasser, U., & Almeida, V. A. F. (2017). A layered model for AI governance. IEEE Internet Computing, 21(6), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2017.4180835
  36. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  37. Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029
  38. Gray, C. M., Kou, Y., Battles, B., Hoggatt, J., & Toombs, A. L. (2018). The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108
  39. Greenleaf, G. (2023). Global data privacy laws 2023: 162 national laws and 20 bills (Privacy Laws and Business International Report No. 181, pp. 2–4). UNSW Law Research Paper No. 23-48. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4426146
  40. Hair Jr, F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2023). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. SAGE Publications.
  41. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Classroom Companion: Business. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  42. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  43. Hunady, J., Pisár, P., Vugec, D. S., & Bach, M. P. (2022). Digital Transformation in European Union: North is leading, and South is lagging behind. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 10(4), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm100403
  44. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  45. Mazzucato, M., Entsminger, J., & Kattel, R. (2021). Reshaping Platform-Driven Digital Markets. Regulating Big Tech, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197616093.003.0002
  46. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
  47. Nissenbaum, H. (2022). Stewardship of Privacy or Private Capture of a Public Value - a Note. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4154535
  48. OECD. (2019a). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/
  49. OECD. (2019b). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
  50. OECD. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Role of Government. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/aiand-the-role-of-government.pdf
  51. Pejić Bach, M., Starešinić, B., Omazić, M. A., Aleksić, A., & Seljan, S. (2020). m-Banking Quality and Bank Reputation. Sustainability, 12(10), 4315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104315
  52. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  53. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Handbook of Market Research, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2
  54. Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049
  55. Stiegler, B. (2018). The Neganthropocene. Open Humanities Press.
  56. Sun, Y., & Qu, Q. (2025). Platform Governance, Institutional Distance, and Seller Trust in Cross-Border E-Commerce. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020183
  57. Taylor, L., Floridi, L., & Van der Sloot, B. (Eds.). (2017). Group privacy: New challenges of data technologies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46608-8
  58. van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
  59. Veale, M. (2020). A critical take on the policy recommendations of the EU High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 11(1), e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2019.65
  60. Veale, M., & Borgesius, F.Z. (2021). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402
  61. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx005
  62. Winfield, A. F. T., & Jirotka, M. (2018). Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180085. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0085
  63. Wischmeyer, T., & Rademacher, T. (Eds.). (2020). Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32361-5
  64. Ziewitz, M. (2016). Governing algorithms: Myth, mess, and methods. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915608948
  65. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2026-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1847-9375 | Journal ISSN: 1847-8344
Language: English
Page range: 179 - 203
Submitted on: May 31, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 18, 2026
Published on: May 10, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Marija Gombar, Marija Boban, published by IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.