References
- 1. API – Business and Innovation Agency (2021), „General Information on OP EIC“, available at https://www.agentura-api.org/en/op-pik-obecne (20 April 2021)
- 2. Arrow, K. J. (1962), “Economic welfare and the allocations of resources of invention“, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 609-626.10.1515/9781400879762-024
- 3. Arza, V., Lopez, E. (2021), „Obstacles affecting innovation in small and medium enterprises: Quantitative analysis of the Argentinean manufacturing sector“, Research Policy, Vol. 50 No. 9, pp. 1039-1052.10.1016/j.respol.2021.104324
- 4. BEIS (2017), “The impact of public support for innovation on firm outcomes“, BEIS Research Paper, No. 3, BEIS, Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, London.
- 5. Bianchini, S., Llerena, P., Martino, R. (2019), “The impact of R&D subsidies under different institutional frameworks“, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 50 No. September 2019, pp. 65-78.10.1016/j.strueco.2019.04.002
- 6. Bisnode (2021), „MagnusWeb“, available at https://magnusweb.bisnode.cz (15 January 2021)
- 7. Bleda, M., del Río, P. (2013), „The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems“, Research Policy, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 1039-1052.10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.008
- 8. Coccia, M. (2017), „Sources of technological innovation: Radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms“, Technology Analysis, Vol. 29 No. 9, pp. 1048-1061.10.1080/09537325.2016.1268682
- 9. Crespi, G., Giuliodori, D., Giuliodori, R., Rodriguez, A. (2016), „The effectiveness of tax incentives for R&D+i in developing countries: The case of Argentina“, Research Policy, Vol. 45 No. 10, pp. 2023-2035.10.1016/j.respol.2016.07.006
- 10. Curran, J., Storey, D. J. (2002), „Small business policy in the United Kingdom: the inheritance of the Small Business Service and implications for its future effectiveness“, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 163-177.10.1068/c0113
- 11. Czech Statistical Office (2021a), „Public database“, available at https://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2/faces/en/index.jsf (28 December 2021)
- 12. Czech Statistical Office (2021b), „Statistical Yearbook of the Czech Republic - 2021“, available at https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/statistical-yearbook-of-the-czech-republic-rtnih2q42g (5 January 2022)
- 13. Dodgson, M., Hughes, A., Foster, J., Metcalfe, S. (2011), „Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia“, Research Policy, Vol. 40 No. 9, pp. 1145-1156.10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015
- 14. European Commission (2003), „Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises“, available at https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32003H0361 (10 May 2022)
- 15. Eurostat (2008), „NACE Rev. 2 - Statistical classification of economic activities“, available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/KS-RA-07-015 (20 April 2021)
- 16. Eurostat (2021), „NUTS - Nomenclature of territorial units for statics“, available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/background (28 December 2021)
- 17. Freel, M., Liu, R., Rammer, C. (2019), „The Export Additionality of Innovation Policy“, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 1257-1277.10.1093/icc/dty059
- 18. Galbraith, B., McAdam, R., Woods, J., McGowan, T. (2017), „Putting Policy into Practice: An Exploratory Study of SME Innovation Support in a Peripheral UK Region“, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 29 No. 7-8, pp. 668-691.10.1080/08985626.2017.1325939
- 19. Giachi, S., Alvarez-Tinoco, R. (2022), „Innovation Policy Development for Sustainable Fisheries in the Global South: From R&D to System Transformation“, Innovation and Development, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 113-134.10.1080/2157930X.2020.1831169
- 20. Grillo, F., Landabaso, M. (2011), „Merits, problems and paradoxes of regional innovation policies“, Local economy, Vol. 26 No. 6-7, pp. 544-561.10.1177/0269094211417161
- 21. Halaskova, M., Gavurova, B., Kocisova, K. (2020), „Research and Development Efficiency in Public and Private Sectors: An Empirical Analysis of EU Countries by Using DEA Methodology“, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 17, pp. 1-22.10.3390/su12177050
- 22. Hunady, J., Pisar P., Durcekova I. (2020), „R&D Investments in the European ICT sector: Implications for Business Performance“, Business Systems Research, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 30-44.10.2478/bsrj-2020-0025
- 23. Jugend, D., Fiorini, P. D. C., Armellini, F., Ferrari, A. G. (2020), „Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation“, Technological Forecasting and Social Chang, Vol. 156 No. July 2020.
- 24. Klímová, V., Winklerová, L. (2017), “Bariéry pro rozvoj inovací v regionech (Barriers to innovation development in regions)“, in Klímová, V., Žítek, V. (Eds.) 20th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 246-254.
- 25. Klímová, V., Žítek, V., Lelková, T. (2021), „The Influence of Public Support for Innovations on the Economic Performance of Enterprises“, in ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, IRENET, Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb, Croatia, pp. 323-331.10.54820/ESAX9929
- 26. Lewczuk, A., Lewkowicz, J. (2020), „Incentives for Private Innovations - Is Public Support Necessary?“, Argumenta Oeconomica, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 105-139.10.15611/aoe.2020.2.05
- 27. Merito, M., Giannangeli, S., Bonaccorsi, A. (2010), „Do incentives to industrial R&D enhance research productivity and firm growth? Evidence from the Italian case“, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 49 No.1/2/3, pp. 25-48.10.1504/IJTM.2010.029409
- 28. Mina, A., Di Minin, A., Martelli, I., Testa, G., Santoleri, P. (2021), „Public funding of innovation: Exploring applications and allocations of the European SME Instrument“, Research Policy, Vol. 50 No. 1.10.1016/j.respol.2020.104131
- 29. Ministry of Regional Development CZ (2021), „DotaceEU.cz. European Funds Portal in the Czech Republic“, available at https://www.dotaceeu.cz/en/home-en (15 January 2021)
- 30. Montmartin, B. A., Herrera, M. (2015), „Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives: Empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models“, Research Policy, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp. 1065-1079.10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.013
- 31. Neméthová, V., Širanová, M., Šipikal, M. (2019), „Public support for firms in lagging regions - evaluation of innovation subsidy in Slovakia“, Science & Public Policy, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 173-183.10.1093/scipol/scy046
- 32. Novak, I. (2020), „Comparative analysis of innovation performance of European Union countries“, Notitia - journal for economic, business and social issues, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 1-11.10.32676/n.6.1.1
- 33. Novosák, J., Hájek, O., Novosáková, J., Lindner, M. (2017), „Enterprise support policy and territorial cohesion: The Czech Republic (2007-2013)“, Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 141-157.
- 34. Odei, S. A., Stejskal, J., Prokop, V. (2021), „Revisiting the Factors Driving Firms’ Innovation Performances: the Case of Visegrad Countries“, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 1331-1344.10.1007/s13132-020-00669-7
- 35. OECD (2005), Oslo manual. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, 3rd ed., Paris, OECD.
- 36. Pekovic, S., Lojpur, A., Pejic-Bach, M. (2015), „Determinants of innovation intensity in developed and in developing economies: The case of France and Croatia“, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 19 No. 5.10.1142/S1363919615500498
- 37. Rodríguez-Pose, A., Belso-Martinez, J.A., Díez-Vial, I. (2021), „Playing the innovation subsidy game: Experience, clusters, consultancy, and networking in regional innovation support“, Cities, Vol. 119.10.1016/j.cities.2021.103402
- 38. Schot, J., Steinmueller, W.E. (2018), „Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change“, Research Policy, Vol. 47 No. 9, pp. 1554-1567.10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
- 39. Segarra-Blasco, A., Garcia-Quevedo, J., Teruel-Carrizosa, M. (2008), „Barriers to innovation and public policy in Catalonia“, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 2008 No. 4, pp. 431-451.10.1007/s11365-008-0086-z
- 40. Sidorkin, O., Srholec, M. (2021), „Do Direct Subsidies Stimulate New R&D Outputs in Firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic“, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, early access.10.1007/s13132-021-00812-y
- 41. Silva, P., Pires, S. M., Teles, F. (2021), „Explanatory models of regional innovation performance in Europe: policy implications for regions“, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 609-631.
- 42. Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M., Gilsing, V. (2005), „A system failure framework for innovation policy design“, Technovation, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 609-619.10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
- 43. Zakić, N., Popović, J., Miškić, M. (2020), „The Linkages Between Investments in Innovation and Business Performance in Serbia“, Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 1-11.
- 44. Žítek, V. (2016), “Změny zaměstnanosti ve výzkumu a vývoji v českých krajích (Changes of employment in research and development in the Czech regions)“, in Klímová, V., Žítek, V. (Eds.), 19th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 289-295.