Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fostering Innovation in the National Systems: An Application to Spain Cover

Fostering Innovation in the National Systems: An Application to Spain

Business Systems Research Journal
Volume 5 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Sep 2014
References

References

  1. 1. Abramovitz, M., David, P. (1996), “Technological Change and the Rise of Intangible Investments: The US Economy’s Growth-path in the Twentieth Century”, in Foray, D., Lundvall, B. A. (eds), “Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-based Economy”, Paris: OECD.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Alchian, A. A., Demsetz, H. (1972), “Production, information costs, and economic organization”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 777-795.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Al-Natour, S., Be n basat, I. (2009), “The Adoption and Use of IT Artifacts: A New Interaction Centric Model for the Study of User-Artifact Relationships”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 661-685.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Artopoulos, A. (2006), “Tenaris. Una corporación global desde el sur”, available at: https://www.udesa.edu.ar/files/UAAdministracion/Documentos%20de%20Trabajo/59.pdf (17 July 2014).
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Benkler, Y. (2002), “Coase’s Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firms”, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 369-446.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Benkler, Y. (2005), “La nueva economía del código abierto”, presentation at TED conference.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Benkler, Y. (2006). “The Wealth of Networks. How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom”, New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Bermejo Ruiz, J. M. (2012), “De la investigación a la innovación: importancia de la gestión de la propiedad intelectual en el sistema científico tecnológico español para la promoción de entornos colaborativos”, doctoral dissertation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Bermejo Ruiz, J. M., De Pablos Heredero, C. (2013), “An analysis of the Spanish Science and Technology system”, Procedia Technology, Vol. 9, pp. 511-517.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Brown, S. L., Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). „Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos”, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Castro, G. M. et al. (2009), “El capital relacional como fuente de innovación tecnológica”, Innovar. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociale, Vol. 19, No. 35, pp. 119-132.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Chung, S. A., Singh, H., Lee, K. (2000), “Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1-22.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Colás, B. P., De Pablos, P. J. (2004), “La formación del profesorado basada en redes de aprendizaje virtual: aplicación de la técnica dafo”, available at: http://campus.usal.es/~teoriaeducacion/rev_numero_05/n5_art_colas_pablos.ht ml/ (23 March 2011).
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Conner, K. R., Prahalad, C. K. (1996), “A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism”, Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 477-501.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Cooke, P. (2005), “Regionally Asymetric Knowledge Capabilities and Open Innovation”, Research Policy, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 1128-1149.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. D’Aveni, R. (1994). “Hypercompetiton: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering”, New York: Free Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Day, G. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 37-52.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. De Pablos Heredero, C. et al. (2012). “Organization and transformation of information systems at firms”, Madrid: ESIC.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Dedrick, J., West, J. (2005), “Why firms adopt Open Source Platforms: A grounded Theory of Innovation and Standards Adoption”, available at: http://www.joelwest.org/misq-stds/proceedings/145_236-257.pdf (17 July 2014).
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Douglas, D. (2003), “Grounded Theory and the “And” in Entrepreneurship Research”, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 47–170.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Douglas, D. (2009), “Entrepreneurship Research and Grounded Theory. Some Methodological Reflections”, available at: https://www.staffs.ac.uk/assets/2009%20David%20Douglas,%20’Entrepreneurship%20Research%20and%20Grounded%20Theory_tcm44-21760.pdf (17 July 2014).
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Doz, Y. L., Olk, P. M., Ring, P. S. (2000), “Formation process of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 239-266.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Drucker, P. F. (1994). “Post-Capitalist Society”, New York: Harper Business.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. EIRMA (2009), “Responsible Partnering. Joining Forces in a World of Open Innovation: Guidelines for Collaborative Research and Knowledge Transfer between Science and Industry”. European Industrial Research Management Association Protocol. The Netherlands.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A. (2000), “Dynamic capabilities: what are they?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 10-11, pp. 1105-1121.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000), “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university industry-government relations”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 109-123.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Fleming, L., Sorenson, O. (2004), “Science as a map in technological search”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 8-9, pp. 909-928.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Galán, J. L., Casanueva, C., Castro-Abancéns, I. (2010), “Las relaciones empresariales: una tipología de redes”, Innovar. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, Vol. 20, No. 38, pp. 27-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Gittell, J. H. (2009). “High Performance Healthcare: Using the Power of Relationships to Achieve Quality, Efficiency and Resilience”, New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Glaser, B. G. (1992). “Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emerge vs. Forcing”, Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Glaser, G., Strauss, A. (1967). “The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research”, New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Goldkuhl, G. (2004). “Conceptual determination when developing a multi-grounded theory. Example and Defining ISD method”, European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management, Reading University, UK.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Gonzalez-Barahona, J. M. et al. (2001), “Counting Potatoes: the Size of Debian 2.2”,Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 60-66.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Hagedroon, J. (1993), “Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 371-385.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Haider, S., De Pablos Heredero, C. (2012), “Determinants of R&D Cooperation: an Institutional Perspective”, Revista de Economía Mundial, No. 32, pp. 239-257.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Hamel, G., Prahalad, C. K. (1993), “Strategy as Stretch and Leverage”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 75-84.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Hamel, G., Prahalad. C. K. (1994). “Competing for the Future”, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Hunt, S. D. (1999). “A general theory of competition”, Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. International Monetary Fund (1997), “Perspectivas de la economía mundial”, Washington, p. 59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H. (1976), “A theory of the firm: Governance, Residual Claims and Organizational Forms”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Krüger, K. (2006), “El concepto de la Sociedad del Conocimiento”, available at: http://www.ub.es/geocrit/b3w-683.htm (25th April 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Larn, A. (2000), “Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework”, Organization Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 487-513.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Locke, K. (2001). “Grounded Theory in Management Research”, London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Lowe, A. (1995), “The basic social processes of entrepreneurial innovation”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 54-76.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. 45. Lundvall, B. (ed.) (1992). “National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning”, London: Printer Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 46. Malerba, F. (2002), “Sectoral systems of innovation and production”, Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 247-264.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. 47. Malerba, F. (ed.) (2004). “Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. 48. McCormack, A. et al. (2007). “Innovation through Global Collaboration: A New Source of Competitive Advantage”, available at: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/07-079.pdf (17 July 2014).
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 49. Mohrman, S. A., Galbraith, J. R., Lawler E. E. (1998), “The Challenge of Change. In Tomorrow’s Organization: Crafting Winning Capabilities in a Dynamic World”, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. 50. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009).” Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments (Vol. 705)”, London: John Wiley & Sons.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. 51. Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G. (1985). “An evolutionary theory of economic change”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. 52. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1996), “A Theory of Organisational Knowledge Creation”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 11, No. 7-8, pp. 833-845.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. 53. Orlikowski, W. J. (1993), “CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incre- mental and Radical Changes in Systems Development”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 309-340.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. 54. Orlikowski, W. J., Robey, D. (1991), “Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 143-169.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. 55. Partington, D. (2000), “Building grounded theories of management action”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 11, pp. 91-102.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. 56. Polanyi, M. (1966). “The Tacit Dimension”, New York: Anchor Day.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. 57. Powell, W. W., Snellman, K. (2004), “The Knowledge Economy”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 30, pp. 199-220.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. 58. Prahalad, C., Hamel, G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 79-91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. 59. Quintero-Campos, L. J. (2010), “Aportes teóricos para el estudio de un sistema de innovación”, Innovar, Vol. 20, No. 38, pp. 57-76.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. 60. Senge, P. M. (1990). “La Quinta Disciplina: El Arte y la Práctica de la Organización Abierta al Aprendizaje”, Buenos Aires: Granica.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. 61. Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L., Christensen, H. K. (2001), “The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 27. No. 6, pp. 777-802.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. 62. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. M. (1990). “Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques”, London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. 63. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. (1994), “The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 537-556.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  64. 64. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamics Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 509-533.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  65. 65. Tidd, J. (2000), “The competence cycle: translating knowledge into new processes, products and services - Chapter 1”, in Tidd, J. (ed.), “From Knowledge management to strategic competencies: measures of technological, market & organizational innovation”, London: Imperial College Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  66. 66. Tognato, C. (2007), “Construir zonas de intercambio entre la academia y el mercado: una aproximación desde la pragmática cultural”, Innovar. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, Vol. 17, No. 30, pp. 7-17.
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. 67. Venkatesh, V. et al. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425-478.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  68. 68. Werger, G. (2003), “Evolutionary markets and the design of institutional policy”, in Pelikan, P., Werger, G. (eds), “The Evolutionary Analysis of Economic Policy”, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. 69. Wheeler, D. (2007), “Why Open Source Software. Look at the Numbers”, available at: http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html (30 Jan 2010).
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. 70. Williamson, O. E. (1975). “Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications”, New York: Pinter.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. 71. Williamson, O. E. (1996). “The mechanisms of governance”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. 72. Zollo, M., Winter, S. G. (2002), “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities”, Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 339-351.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2014-0014 | Journal eISSN: 1847-9375 | Journal ISSN: 1847-8344
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 110 - 124
Submitted on: Oct 2, 2013
Accepted on: May 16, 2014
Published on: Sep 10, 2014
Published by: IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
open innovation practices,
science and technology system,
EIRMA,
transfer of knowledge,
grounded theory,
stakeholders
JEL:
M1,
M2
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Business management, other

© 2014 Carmen de Pablos Heredero, Jose Manuel Bermejo Ruiz, published by IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 5 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)
Previous article
Next article