References
- 1. Abramovitz, M., David, P. (1996), “Technological Change and the Rise of Intangible Investments: The US Economy’s Growth-path in the Twentieth Century”, in Foray, D., Lundvall, B. A. (eds), “Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-based Economy”, Paris: OECD.
- 2. Alchian, A. A., Demsetz, H. (1972), “Production, information costs, and economic organization”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 777-795.
- 3. Al-Natour, S., Be n basat, I. (2009), “The Adoption and Use of IT Artifacts: A New Interaction Centric Model for the Study of User-Artifact Relationships”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 661-685.
- 4. Artopoulos, A. (2006), “Tenaris. Una corporación global desde el sur”, available at: https://www.udesa.edu.ar/files/UAAdministracion/Documentos%20de%20Trabajo/59.pdf (17 July 2014).
- 5. Benkler, Y. (2002), “Coase’s Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firms”, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 369-446.
- 6. Benkler, Y. (2005), “La nueva economía del código abierto”, presentation at TED conference.
- 7. Benkler, Y. (2006). “The Wealth of Networks. How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom”, New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
- 8. Bermejo Ruiz, J. M. (2012), “De la investigación a la innovación: importancia de la gestión de la propiedad intelectual en el sistema científico tecnológico español para la promoción de entornos colaborativos”, doctoral dissertation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
- 9. Bermejo Ruiz, J. M., De Pablos Heredero, C. (2013), “An analysis of the Spanish Science and Technology system”, Procedia Technology, Vol. 9, pp. 511-517.
- 10. Brown, S. L., Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). „Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos”, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- 11. Castro, G. M. et al. (2009), “El capital relacional como fuente de innovación tecnológica”, Innovar. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociale, Vol. 19, No. 35, pp. 119-132.
- 12. Chung, S. A., Singh, H., Lee, K. (2000), “Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1-22.
- 13. Colás, B. P., De Pablos, P. J. (2004), “La formación del profesorado basada en redes de aprendizaje virtual: aplicación de la técnica dafo”, available at: http://campus.usal.es/~teoriaeducacion/rev_numero_05/n5_art_colas_pablos.ht ml/ (23 March 2011).
- 14. Conner, K. R., Prahalad, C. K. (1996), “A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism”, Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 477-501.
- 15. Cooke, P. (2005), “Regionally Asymetric Knowledge Capabilities and Open Innovation”, Research Policy, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 1128-1149.
- 16. D’Aveni, R. (1994). “Hypercompetiton: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering”, New York: Free Press.
- 17. Day, G. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 37-52.
- 18. De Pablos Heredero, C. et al. (2012). “Organization and transformation of information systems at firms”, Madrid: ESIC.
- 19. Dedrick, J., West, J. (2005), “Why firms adopt Open Source Platforms: A grounded Theory of Innovation and Standards Adoption”, available at: http://www.joelwest.org/misq-stds/proceedings/145_236-257.pdf (17 July 2014).
- 20. Douglas, D. (2003), “Grounded Theory and the “And” in Entrepreneurship Research”, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 47–170.
- 21. Douglas, D. (2009), “Entrepreneurship Research and Grounded Theory. Some Methodological Reflections”, available at: https://www.staffs.ac.uk/assets/2009%20David%20Douglas,%20’Entrepreneurship%20Research%20and%20Grounded%20Theory_tcm44-21760.pdf (17 July 2014).
- 22. Doz, Y. L., Olk, P. M., Ring, P. S. (2000), “Formation process of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 239-266.
- 23. Drucker, P. F. (1994). “Post-Capitalist Society”, New York: Harper Business.
- 24. EIRMA (2009), “Responsible Partnering. Joining Forces in a World of Open Innovation: Guidelines for Collaborative Research and Knowledge Transfer between Science and Industry”. European Industrial Research Management Association Protocol. The Netherlands.
- 25. Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A. (2000), “Dynamic capabilities: what are they?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 10-11, pp. 1105-1121.
- 26. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000), “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university industry-government relations”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 109-123.
- 27. Fleming, L., Sorenson, O. (2004), “Science as a map in technological search”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 8-9, pp. 909-928.
- 28. Galán, J. L., Casanueva, C., Castro-Abancéns, I. (2010), “Las relaciones empresariales: una tipología de redes”, Innovar. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, Vol. 20, No. 38, pp. 27-44.
- 29. Gittell, J. H. (2009). “High Performance Healthcare: Using the Power of Relationships to Achieve Quality, Efficiency and Resilience”, New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
- 30. Glaser, B. G. (1992). “Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emerge vs. Forcing”, Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
- 31. Glaser, G., Strauss, A. (1967). “The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research”, New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
- 32. Goldkuhl, G. (2004). “Conceptual determination when developing a multi-grounded theory. Example and Defining ISD method”, European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management, Reading University, UK.
- 33. Gonzalez-Barahona, J. M. et al. (2001), “Counting Potatoes: the Size of Debian 2.2”, Upgrade, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 60-66.
- 34. Hagedroon, J. (1993), “Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 371-385.
- 35. Haider, S., De Pablos Heredero, C. (2012), “Determinants of R&D Cooperation: an Institutional Perspective”, Revista de Economía Mundial, No. 32, pp. 239-257.
- 36. Hamel, G., Prahalad, C. K. (1993), “Strategy as Stretch and Leverage”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 75-84.
- 37. Hamel, G., Prahalad. C. K. (1994). “Competing for the Future”, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- 38. Hunt, S. D. (1999). “A general theory of competition”, Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.
- 39. International Monetary Fund (1997), “Perspectivas de la economía mundial”, Washington, p. 59.
- 40. Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H. (1976), “A theory of the firm: Governance, Residual Claims and Organizational Forms”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360.
- 41. Krüger, K. (2006), “El concepto de la Sociedad del Conocimiento”, available at: http://www.ub.es/geocrit/b3w-683.htm (25th April 2012).
- 42. Larn, A. (2000), “Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework”, Organization Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 487-513.
- 43. Locke, K. (2001). “Grounded Theory in Management Research”, London: Sage.
- 44. Lowe, A. (1995), “The basic social processes of entrepreneurial innovation”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 54-76.
- 45. Lundvall, B. (ed.) (1992). “National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning”, London: Printer Publishers.
- 46. Malerba, F. (2002), “Sectoral systems of innovation and production”, Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 247-264.
- 47. Malerba, F. (ed.) (2004). “Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 48. McCormack, A. et al. (2007). “Innovation through Global Collaboration: A New Source of Competitive Advantage”, available at: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/07-079.pdf (17 July 2014).
- 49. Mohrman, S. A., Galbraith, J. R., Lawler E. E. (1998), “The Challenge of Change. In Tomorrow’s Organization: Crafting Winning Capabilities in a Dynamic World”, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
- 50. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009).” Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments (Vol. 705)”, London: John Wiley & Sons.
- 51. Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G. (1985). “An evolutionary theory of economic change”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- 52. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1996), “A Theory of Organisational Knowledge Creation”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 11, No. 7-8, pp. 833-845.
- 53. Orlikowski, W. J. (1993), “CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incre- mental and Radical Changes in Systems Development”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 309-340.
- 54. Orlikowski, W. J., Robey, D. (1991), “Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 143-169.
- 55. Partington, D. (2000), “Building grounded theories of management action”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 11, pp. 91-102.
- 56. Polanyi, M. (1966). “The Tacit Dimension”, New York: Anchor Day.
- 57. Powell, W. W., Snellman, K. (2004), “The Knowledge Economy”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 30, pp. 199-220.
- 58. Prahalad, C., Hamel, G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 79-91.
- 59. Quintero-Campos, L. J. (2010), “Aportes teóricos para el estudio de un sistema de innovación”, Innovar, Vol. 20, No. 38, pp. 57-76.
- 60. Senge, P. M. (1990). “La Quinta Disciplina: El Arte y la Práctica de la Organización Abierta al Aprendizaje”, Buenos Aires: Granica.
- 61. Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L., Christensen, H. K. (2001), “The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 27. No. 6, pp. 777-802.
- 62. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. M. (1990). “Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques”, London: Sage.
- 63. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. (1994), “The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 537-556.
- 64. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamics Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 509-533.
- 65. Tidd, J. (2000), “The competence cycle: translating knowledge into new processes, products and services - Chapter 1”, in Tidd, J. (ed.), “From Knowledge management to strategic competencies: measures of technological, market & organizational innovation”, London: Imperial College Press.
- 66. Tognato, C. (2007), “Construir zonas de intercambio entre la academia y el mercado: una aproximación desde la pragmática cultural”, Innovar. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, Vol. 17, No. 30, pp. 7-17.
- 67. Venkatesh, V. et al. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425-478.
- 68. Werger, G. (2003), “Evolutionary markets and the design of institutional policy”, in Pelikan, P., Werger, G. (eds), “The Evolutionary Analysis of Economic Policy”, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- 69. Wheeler, D. (2007), “Why Open Source Software. Look at the Numbers”, available at: http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html (30 Jan 2010).
- 70. Williamson, O. E. (1975). “Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications”, New York: Pinter.
- 71. Williamson, O. E. (1996). “The mechanisms of governance”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 72. Zollo, M., Winter, S. G. (2002), “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities”, Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 339-351.