Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Studying, Defining and Reaching the Audience in a Film Market: The Case of Estonia Cover

Studying, Defining and Reaching the Audience in a Film Market: The Case of Estonia

By: Sten Kauber  
Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Ang, Ien 1991. Desperately seeking the audience. London: Routledge.
  2. Braun, Virginia; Clarke, Virginia 2012. ‘Thematic analysis.’ – H. Cooper (ed.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2. Research Designs. American Psychological Association, 57–71.
  3. Brinkmann, Svend 2018. ‘The interview’. – N. K. Denzin & U. S. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 576–599.
  4. Caldwell, John T. 2008. Production culture: Industrial reflexivity and critical practice in film and television. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  5. Deuze, Mark 2007. Media work. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  6. Dornfeld, Barry 1998. Producing public television, producing public culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  7. Ettema, James S.; Whitney, D. Charles 1994. ‘The money arrow: An introduction to audiencemaking’. – J. S. Ettema & D. C. Whitney (eds.), AudienceMaking: How the media create the audience. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 1–18
  8. Funk, Jannis 2021. Algorithms and producers: An evidence-based approach to target audience definition and revenue prediction for feature film producers. Doctoral dissertation, Filmuniversität Babelsberg Konrad Wolf. Potsdam.
  9. Goffman, Ervin 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin Books.
  10. Gibson, James J. 1979. ‘The theory of affordances.’ – J. J. Gieseking, W. Mangold, C. Katz, S. Low & S. Saegert (eds.), The people, place, and space reader. New York: Routledge, 90–94.
  11. Gitlin, Todd 1983. Inside Prime Time. New York: Pantheon Books.
  12. Genette, Gérard 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Gray, Jonathan 2010. Show sold separately: Promos, spoilers, and other media paratexts. New York: NYU Press.
  14. Hesmondhalgh, David, and Sarah Baker 2011. Creative Labour. Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. London: Routledge.
  15. Hill. John; Kawashima, Nobuko 2016. ‘Introduction: Film policy in a globalised cultural economy.’ – International Journal of Cultural Policy 22, 5, 667–672.
  16. Ibrus, Indrek; Tafel-Viia, Külliki; Lassur, Silja; Viia, Andres 2015. ‘Tallinn film cluster: Realities, expectations and alternatives.’ – Baltic Screen Media Review, 1(1), 6–27.
  17. Jenkins, Henry 2006. Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: NYU Press.
  18. Kauber, Sten 2022. ‘The Imagined Affordances of Cinema-Going and National Cinema.’ – Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies 19 (1): 199–223.
  19. Kauber, Sten; Rohn, Ulrike 2025. ‘Understanding Film Industry and Audience Dynamics Through Imagined Affordances, Social Network Markets and Value Creation.’ – Eastern European Screen Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/29974828.2025.2449755.
  20. Kerrigan, Finola 2010. Film marketing (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.
  21. Kim, Jisu; Lewis, Seth C.; Watson, Brendan R. 2018. ‘The imagined audience for and perceived quality of news comments: Exploring the perceptions of commenters on news sites and on Facebook.’ – Social Media + Society Vol. 4, 1, 1–12.
  22. Koljonen, Johanna 2020. Nostradamus report: A creative explosion. Göteborg: Göteborg Film Festival.
  23. Koljonen, Johanna 2019. Nostradamus report: Relevance in a new reality. Göteborg: Göteborg Film Festival.
  24. Koljonen, Johanna 2018. Nostradamus report: Do or die? Göteborg: Göteborg Film Festival.
  25. Litt, Eden; Hargittai, Eszter 2016 ‘The Imagined Audience on Social Network Sites.’ – Social Media + Society January-March 2016, 1–12.
  26. Litt, Eden 2012. ‘Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience.’ – Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56, 3, 330–345.
  27. Marwick, Alice E.; Boyd, Danah 2011. ‘I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.’ – New Media & Society 13, 114–133.
  28. McElroy, Ruth; Noonan, Caitriona 2022. ‘Film policy, social value, and the mediating role of screen agencies.’ – M. Hjort & T. Nannicelli (eds.), A companion to motion pictures and public value. Chichester: Wiley
  29. McQuail, Dennis 1987. Mass communication theory: An introduction. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
  30. Mertens, Donna M. 2014. ‘Ethical use of qualitative data and findings.’ – U. Flick (ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
  31. Meyrowitz, Joshua 1985. No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Mitkus Tomas; Nedzinskaitė-Mitkė, Vaida 2015. ‘The impact of globalization to creative industries: The analysis of film industries of Central and Eastern Europe.’ – Creativity studies, 9, 1, 64–74.
  33. Mittell, Jason 2001 ‘A cultural approach to television genre theory.’ – Cinema Journal, 40, 3, 3–24.
  34. Murumaa, Maria; Siibak, Andra 2012. ‘The imagined audience on Facebook: Analysis of Estonian teen sketches about typical Facebook users.’ – First Monday, 17, 2.
  35. Nagy, Peter; Neff, Gina 2015. ‘Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory.’ – Social Media + Society, 1, 2, 1–9.
  36. Napoli, Philip M. 2011. Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
  37. Norman, Donald A. 1999. ‘Affordance, conventions, and design’. – Interactions, 6, 3, 38–43.
  38. Norman, Donald A. 1990. The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.
  39. Norman, Donald A. 1988. The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
  40. Puppis, Manuel 2009. ‘Media regulation in small states.’ International communication gazette 71, 1–2, 7–17.
  41. Reitalu, Liisi 2020. Elektriteatri külastajate persoonad ja külastusteekond. Master’s thesis. University of Tartu. Tartu.
  42. Rohn, Ulrike (2014). Small market, big format: Idols in Estonia. Baltic Screen Media Review, (2), 122–137.
  43. Rohn, Ulrike; Nylund, Mats (2018). The sharing economy: How sharing activities influence value creation in the TV audience market. International Journal of Digital Television, 9(2), 147–165.
  44. Ross, Philippe 2019. ‘How (well) do media professionals know their audiences? SEE meets media studies.’ – D. S. Caudill, S. N. Conley, M. E. Gorman, & M. Weinel (eds.), The third wave in science and technology studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan
  45. Ross, Philippe 2014. ‘Were producers and audiences ever separate? Conceptualizing media production as social situation.’ – Television & New Media 15, 2, 157–174.
  46. Sifaki, Eirini; Papadopoulou, Maria 2022. ‘Exploring film marketing in the new age digital era. Four cases of marketing European art house film productions.’ – International Journal of Cultural Management, 1, 1, 3–25.
  47. Soo, Eveli 2011. Filmiturundusmeetmestik eesti filmiturunduse näitel. Master’s thesis. University of Tartu. Tartu
  48. Szczepanik, Petr 2021. Screen industries in East-Central Europe. London: Bloomsbury.
  49. Tafel-Viia, Külliki; Lassur, Silja; Ibrus, Indrek; Viia, Andres; Terk, Erik 2012. Audiovisuaalvaldkonna klasterdumise perspektiivid. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Eesti Tuleviku-uuringute Instituut.
  50. Thompson, John B. 1995. The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Cambridge, UK: Polity. Tiidenberg, Katrin 2018. ‘Ethics in digital research.’ – U. Flick (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. London: SAGE Publications.
  51. Zafirau, Stephen 2009. ‘Audience knowledge and the everyday lives of cultural producers in Hollywood.’ – V. Mayer, M. J. Banks, & T. J. Caldwell (eds.), Production studies: Cultural studies of media industries. Routledge, 190–202.
  52. Zeiser, Anne 2015. Transmedia marketing: From film and TV to games and digital media. New York: Focal Press.
Language: English
Page range: 2 - 21
Published on: Dec 23, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Sten Kauber, published by Tallinn University Baltic Film, Media, Arts and Communication School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.