Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Lived Experience in the “Naturalistic” Paradigm: Implementing Empirical Phenomenology with Expert Participants for Neurocinematics Cover

Lived Experience in the “Naturalistic” Paradigm: Implementing Empirical Phenomenology with Expert Participants for Neurocinematics

By: Jelena Rosic  
Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Albarracin, Mahault, Riddhi J. Pitliya, Maxwell JD Ramstead, and Jeffrey Yoshimi. 2022. ‘Mapping Husserlian phenomenology onto active inference.’ – In International Workshop on Active Inference, pp. 99–111. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28719-0_7
  2. Arnheim, Rudolf. 1954. Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Univ of California Press
  3. Berkovich-Ohana, Aviva, Yair Dor-Ziderman, Fynn-Mathis Trautwein, Yoav Schweitzer, Ohad Nave, Stephen Fulder, and Yochai Ataria. 2020. ‘The hitchhiker’s guide to neurophenomenology–The case of studying self boundaries with meditators.’ – Frontiers in Psychology 11: 1680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01680
  4. Bitbol, Michel, and Claire Petitmengin. 2013. ‘A defense of introspection from within.’ – Constructivist Foundations 8, no. 3: 269-279. http://constructivist.info/8/3/269
  5. Coëgnarts, Maarten, and Peter Kravanja. 2012. ‘Embodied visual meaning: Image schemas in film.’ – Projections 6, no. 2: 84-101. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2012.060206
  6. Coëgnarts, Maarten. 2017. ‘Cinema and the embodied mind: metaphor and simulation in understanding meaning in films.’ – Palgrave Communications 3, no. 1: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.67
  7. De Lange, Floris P., Micha Heilbron, and Peter Kok. 2018. ‘How do expectations shape perception?.’ – Trends in cognitive sciences 22, no. 9: 764–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.002
  8. den Ouden, H. E. M., J. Daunizeau, J. Roiser, N. N. Daw, K. J. Friston, and K. E. Stephan. 2009. ‘Striatal prediction error activity drives cortical connectivity changes during associative learning.’ – NeuroImage 47: S55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-8119(09)70183-1
  9. Depraz, Natalie, Francisco J. Varela, and Pierre Vermersch. 2000. ‘The gesture of awareness.’ – Investigating phenomenological consciousness 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.13.10dep
  10. Depraz, Natalie, Francisco J. Varela, and Pierre Vermersch. 2003. On becoming aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. Vol. 43. John Benjamins Publishing https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.43
  11. Depraz, Natalie, Maria Gyemant, and Thomas Desmidt. 2017. ‘A first-person analysis using third-person data as a generative method.’ – Construc. Found 12: 190-203. http://constructivist.info/12/2/190
  12. Depraz, Natalie, and Thomas Desmidt. 2019. ‘Cardiophenomenology: a refinement of neurophenomenology.’ – Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18: 493-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9590-y
  13. Fingerhut, Joerg. 2021. ‘Enacting media. An embodied account of enculturation between neuromediality and new cognitive media theory.’ – Frontiers in Psychology 12: 635993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635993
  14. Fingerhut, Joerg, and Katrin Heimann. 2022. ‘Enacting Moving Images: Film Theory and Experimental Science within a New Cognitive Media Theory.’ – Projections 16, no. 1: 105-123. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2022.160107
  15. Friston, Karl. 2005. ‘A theory of cortical responses.’ – Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences 360, no. 1456: 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
  16. Froese, Tom, Cassandra Gould, and Adam Barrett. 2011. ‘Re-Viewing from Within A Commentary on First-and Second-Person Methods in the Science of Consciousness.’ – Constructivist Foundations 6, no. 2. http://constructivist.info/6/2/254
  17. Gaete Celis, María Isabel. 2019. ‘Micro-phenomenology and traditional qualitative research methods.’ – Constructivist Foundations 14, no. 2: 146–149. https://constructivist.info/14/2/146
  18. Gallagher, Shaun. 2003. ‘Phenomenology and experimental design toward a phenomenologically enlightened experimental science.’ – Journal of consciousness studies 10, no. 9-10: 85–99. https://philpapers.org/rec/GALPAE
  19. Gallese, Vittorio. 2005. ‘Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience.’ – Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 4: 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-4737-z
  20. Gallese, Vittorio, and Michele Guerra. 2012. ‘Embodying movies: Embodied simulation and film studies.’ – Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image 3: 183-210. https://philpapers.org/rec/GALEME-4
  21. Ghosh, Vanessa E., and Asaf Gilboa. 2014. ‘What is a memory schema? A historical perspective on current neuroscience literature.’ – Neuropsychologia 53: 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.010
  22. Hasson, U.; Landesman, O.; Knappmeyer, B.; Vallines, I.; Rubin, N.; Heeger, D. 2008. ‘Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film.’– Projections: the Journal for Movies and Mind, 2, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2008.020102.
  23. Hasson, Uri, and Christopher J. Honey. 2012. ‘Future trends in Neuroimaging: Neural processes as expressed within real-life contexts.’ – NeuroImage 62, no. 2: 1272-1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.004
  24. Jääskeläinen, Iiro P., Mikko Sams, Enrico Glerean, and Jyrki Ahveninen. 2021. ‘Movies and narratives as naturalistic stimuli in neuroimaging.’ – NeuroImage 224: 117445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117445
  25. Johansson, Petter, Lars Hall, Sverker Sikstrom, and Andreas Olsson. 2005. “Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task.” – Science 310, no. 5745: 116-119. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111709
  26. Kauttonen, Janne, Yevhen Hlushchuk, Iiro P. Jääskeläinen, and Pia Tikka. 2018. ‘Brain mechanisms underlying cue-based memorizing during free viewing of movie Memento.’ – NeuroImage 172: 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.068
  27. Kordeš, Urban. 2013. ‘Problems and opportunities of first-person research.’ – Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems: INDECS 11, no. 4: 363–375. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.11.4.2
  28. Kordeš, Urban. 2016. ‘Going beyond theory: Constructivism and empirical phenomenology. – Constructivist Foundations 11 (2): 375–385. http://constructivist.info/11/2/375
  29. Kordeš, Urban, and Ema Demšar. 2018. ‘Excavating belief about past experience: Experiential dynamics of the reflective act.’ – Constructivist Foundations 13(2): 219–229. http://constructivist.info/13/2/219
  30. Kukkonen, Karin, and Marco Caracciolo. 2014. ‘Introduction: What is the ‘second generation?’ – Style 48, no. 3 : 261-274. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/style.48.3.261
  31. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. ‘Metaphors we live by.’ – University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  32. Lee, Caroline S., Mariam Aly, and Christopher Baldassano. 2021. ‘Anticipation of temporally structured events in the brain.’ – Elife 10: e64972. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.64972
  33. Lutz, Antoine. 2002. ‘Toward a neurophenomenology as an account of generative passages: A first empirical case study.’ – Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 1, no. 2: 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020320221083
  34. Lutz, Antoine, and Evan Thompson. 2003. ‘Neurophenomenology integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness.’ – Journal of consciousness studies 10, no. 9-10: 31–52. https://philpapers.org/rec/LUTNI
  35. Nisbett, Richard E., and Timothy D. Wilson. 1977. ‘Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.’ – Psychological review 84, no. 3: 231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231
  36. Olivares, Francisco A., Esteban Vargas, Claudio Fuentes, David Martínez-Pernía, and Andrés Canales-Johnson. 2015. ‘Neurophenomenology revisited: second-person methods for the study of human consciousness.’ – Frontiers in psychology 6: 673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00673
  37. Petitmengin-Peugeot, Claire. 1999. ‘The intuitive experience.’ – Journal of Consciousness studies 6, no. 2–3 : 43–77. https://philpapers.org/rec/PETTIE-2
  38. Petitmengin, Claire. 2006. ‘Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness.’ – Phenomenology and the Cognitive sciences 5, no. 3–4: 229–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-006-9022-2
  39. Petitmengin, Claire, Vincent Navarro, and Michel Le Van Quyen. 2007. ‘Anticipating seizure: Pre-reflective experience at the center of neuro-phenomenology.’ – Consciousness and cognition 16, no. 3: 746–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.006
  40. Petitmengin, Claire, Bitbol, Michel. 2009. ‘The validity of first-person descriptions as authenticity and coherence.’ – Journal of Consciousness studies 16, no. 10–11: 252–284. ‹hal-00434456›
  41. Petitmengin, Claire. 2010. ‘A neurophenomenological study of epileptic seizure anticipation.’ – Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_25
  42. Petitmengin, Claire, Anne Remillieux, Béatrice Cahour, and Shirley Carter-Thomas. 2013. ‘A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes.’ – Consciousness and cognition 22, no. 2: 654–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.004
  43. Petitmengin, Claire, and Jean-Philippe Lachaux. 2013. ‘Microcognitive science: bridging experiential and neuronal microdynamics.’ – Frontiers in human neuroscience 7: 617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00617
  44. Petitmengin, Claire. 2017. ‘Enaction as a lived experience: Towards a radical neurophenomenology.’ – Constructivist Foundations 12, no. 2: 139–147. http://constructivist.info/12/2/139
  45. Petitmengin, Claire, Anne Remillieux, and Camila Valenzuela-Moguillansky. 2019. ‘Discovering the structures of lived experience: Towards a micro-phenomenological analysis method.’ – Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18, no. 4: 691–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9597-4
  46. Poldrack, Russell A. 2006. ‘Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?’ – Trends in cognitive sciences 10, no. 2: 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
  47. Poldrack, Russell A. 2011. ‘Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding.’ – Neuron 72, no. 5: 692–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.001
  48. Poldrack, Russell A., and Tal Yarkoni. 2016. ‘From brain maps to cognitive ontologies: informatics and the search for mental structure.’ – Annual review of psychology 67: 587-612. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033729
  49. Ramstead, Maxwell JD, Anil K. Seth, Casper Hesp, Lars Sandved-Smith, Jonas Mago, Michael Lifshitz, Giuseppe Pagnoni, Ryan Smith, Guillaume Dumas, Antoine Lutz, Karl Friston, Axel Constant. 2022. “From generative models to generative passages: a computational approach to (neuro) phenomenology.” – Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13, no. 4: 829–857. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k9pbn
  50. Roy, Jean-Michel, Jean Petitot, Bernard Pachoud, and Francisco J. Varela. 1999. ‘Beyond the gap: An introduction to naturalizing phenomenology.’ – In Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science, pp. 1-83. Stanford University Press https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503617421-004
  51. Varela, Francisco; Thompson, Evan; Rosch, Eleanor. 1991. The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001
  52. Shear, Jonathan, and Francisco J. Varela, (Eds). 1999. The view from within: First-person approaches to the study of consciousness. Imprint Academic https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2000.11007303
  53. Tikka, Pia, and Mauri Ylermi Kaipainen. 2014. ‘From naturalistic neuroscience to modeling radical embodiment with narrative enactive systems.’ – Frontiers in human neuroscience 8: 794. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00794
  54. Thompson, Evan, Antoine Lutz, and Diego Cosmelli. 2005. ‘Neurophenomenology: An introduction for neurophilosophers.’ – Cognition and the brain: The philosophy and neuroscience movement 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511610608.003
  55. Valenzuela-Moguillansky, Camila, and Alejandra Vásquez-Rosati. 2019. ‘An analysis procedure for the micro-phenomenological interview.’ – Constructivist Foundations 14, no. 2: 123-145 https://constructivist.info/14/2/123
  56. Valenzuela-Moguillansky, Camila, and Ema Demšar. 2023. ‘Toward a science of experience: outlining some challenges and future directions.’ – Adaptive Behavior 31, no. 5: 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123221084739
  57. Varela, Francisco G., Humberto R. Maturana, and Ricardo Uribe. 1974. ‘Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model.’ – Biosystems 5, no. 4: 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(74)90031-8
  58. Varela, Francisco J. 1996. ‘Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem.’ – Journal of consciousness studies 3, no. 4: 330–349. https://philpapers.org/rec/VARNAM
  59. Varela, Francisco J., and Jonathan Shear. 1999. ‘First-person methodologies: What, why, how.’ – Journal of Consciousness studies 6, no. 2–3: 1–14. https://philpapers.org/rec/VARFMW
  60. Vermersch, Pierre. 2007. The Explicitation Interview. Independently published
  61. Vermersch, Pierre. 2009. ‘Describing the practice of introspection.’ – Journal of consciousness studies 16, no. 10-11: 20-57. https://philpapers.org/rec/VERDTP
  62. Vermersch, Pierre. 2016. ‘Notes on the Coupling between the Observer and the Observed in Psycho-Phenomenology.’ – Constructivist Foundations 11, no. 2: 391–393. http://constructivist.info/11/2/391
  63. Willemsen, Steven Petrus Martinus. 2018. The Cognitive and Hermeneutic Dynamics of Complex Film Narratives. University of Groningen.
  64. Zahavi, Dan. 2021. ‘Applied phenomenology: Why it is safe to ignore the epoché.’ – Continental Philosophy Review 54, no. 2: 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-019-09463-y
Language: English
Page range: 48 - 67
Published on: Dec 21, 2023
Published by: Tallinn University Baltic Film, Media, Arts and Communication School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Jelena Rosic, published by Tallinn University Baltic Film, Media, Arts and Communication School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.