Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Flexibility, Flâneurie, and Affinity in the Metaverse Cover

Flexibility, Flâneurie, and Affinity in the Metaverse

By: Natasha Chuk  
Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Aarseth, Espen 1997. Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.10.56021/9780801855788
  2. Ball, Matthew 2022. The Metaverse: And How It Will Revolutionize Everything. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
  3. Bernstein, Mark 1998. Hypertext Gardens: Delightful Vistas. Retrieved from http://www.eastgate.com/garden/Enter.html
  4. Bogost, Ian 2021. The Metaverse Is Bad. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2021/10/facebook-metaverse-name-change/620449/
  5. Durham-Peters, John 2015. The Marvelous Clouds: Toward a Philosophy of Elemental Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226253978.001.0001
  6. Fuchs, Christian 2013. Social Media: A Critical Introduction. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  7. Gee, James Paul 2004. Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling: New York, London: Routledge.
  8. Germain, Thomas 2022. Meta’s New Headset Will Track Your Eyes for Targeted Ads. Gizmodo. Retrieved from https://gizmodo.com/meta-quest-pro-vr-headset-track-eyes-ads-facebook-1849654424
  9. Hendel, John 2012. The Life of the Cyberflâneur. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/02/the-life-of-the-cyberflneur/252687/
  10. Klastrup, Lisbeth 2009. The Worldness of EverQuest: Exploring 21st Century Fiction. Game Studies. 9(1). Retrieved from http://gamestudies.org/0901/articles/klastrup
  11. McGonigal, Jane 2015. SuperBetter: A revolutionary Approach to Getting Stronger, Happier, and More Resilient. New York: Penguin Press.
  12. Miller, Vincent 2017. Phatic culture and the status quo: Reconsidering the purpose of social media activism. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 23(3) 251–269.10.1177/1354856515592512
  13. Murray, Janet H. 1997. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. New York: The Free Press.
  14. Nayyar, Rhea 2022. The Metaverse Is Empty, and Legs Won’t Save It. Hyperallergic. Retrieved from https://hyperallergic.com/769614/metaverse-decentraland-is-empty/
  15. Stephenson, Neal 1992. Snow Crash. New York: Bantam Books.
  16. Robertson, A. & Peters, J. 2021. What Is the Metaverse, and Do I Have to Care?. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/22701104/metaverse-explained-fortnite-roblox-facebook-horizon
  17. Robins, Kevin 1996. Into the Image: Culture and Politics in the Field of Vision. London: Routledge.
  18. Russell, Legacy 2020. Glitch Feminism: A Manifesto. London: Verso.
  19. Wolf, Mark 2012. Building Imaginary Worlds: The Theory and History of Subcreation. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Language: English
Page range: 235 - 251
Published on: Dec 16, 2022
Published by: Tallinn University Baltic Film, Media, Arts and Communication School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Natasha Chuk, published by Tallinn University Baltic Film, Media, Arts and Communication School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.