References
- Bell, Joshua A.; Christen, Kimberly; Turin, Mark 2013. After the Return: Digital Repatriation and the Circulation of Indigenous Knowledge Workshop Report. Museum Worlds, 1(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3167/armw.2013.010112
- Berg, Ahnlund. Charlotte. Tingens metod. Swedish National Heritage Board – Riksantikvarieämbetet. https://www.raa.se/museer/publikt-arbete/tingensmetod/ (26 May 2021).
- Boast, Robin; Enote, Jim 2013. Virtual Repatriation: It Is Neither Virtual nor Repatriation. In P. F. Biehl & C. Prescott (Eds.), Heritage in the Context of Globalization: Europe and the Americas (pp. 103–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6077-0_13
- Bolter, J. David; Grusin, Richard 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Cameron, Fiona; Kenderdine, Sarah 2010. Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Carpentier, Nico 2009. ‘Participation is Not Enough: The Conditions of Possibility of Mediated Participatory Practices’. – European Journal of Communication 24,4, 407–420.
- Couldry, Nick; Mejias, A. Ulises 2019. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. California: Stanford University Press.
- Drotner, Kirsten; Dziekan, Vince; Parry, Ross; Schrøder, C. Kim 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Museums, Media and Communication. doi: 10.4324/9781315560168.
- European Commission 2002. The DIGICULT Report: Technological Landscapes for Tomorrow’s Cultural Economy: Unlocking the Value of Cultural Heritage, Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General for the Information Society, Brussels https://www.digicult.info/pages/report2002/dc_fullreport_230602_screen.pdf (08 June 2021).
- Ferrer-Conill, Raul; Tandoc, C. Edson 2018. The Audience-Oriented Editor. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1440972.
- Henkel, A. Linda 2014. Point-and-Shoot Memories: The Influence of Taking Photos on Memory for a Museum Tour. Psychological Science, 25(2), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504438.
- Hjarvard, Stig 2013. The Mediatization of Culture and Society. London & New York: Routledge.
- Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean 2000. ‘Changing Values in the Art Museum: Rethinking Communication and Learning’. – International Journal of Heritage Studies 6,1, 9–31.
- Hogsden, Carl; Poulter, Emma 2012. ‘The Real Other? Museum Objects in Digital Contact Networks’. – Journal of Material Culture 17,3, 265–286.
- Huseby, B. Hege; Treimo, Henrik (eds.) 2018. Tingenes Metod: Museene som tingsteder. Norway: Nords Teknisk Museum https://tingenesmetode.no/images/PDF/Museene-som-tingsteder-2018_LQ.pdf.
- Hutchby, Ian 2001. ‘Technologies, texts and affordances’. – Sociology 35,2, 441–456.
- Jenkins, Henry; Carpentier, Nico 2013. Theorizing participatory intensities: A conversation about participation and politics. Convergence, 19(3), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856513482090.
- Jenkins, Henry; Ito, Mizuko; Boyd, Dana 2015. Participatory Culture in a Networked Era. John Wiley & Sons.
- Marstine, Janet 2011. ‘The Contingent Nature of the Museum Ethics’ – Jane Marstine (ed.), Routledge companion to museum ethics, Taylor & Francis, 3–25.
- Marty, F. Paul 2007. Museum Websites and Museum Visitors: Before and After the Museum Visit. Museum Management and Curatorship, 22(4), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770701757708
- Maurer, Jason 2021. Decolonial affordances of a communal heritage platform: A case study of the Reciprocal Research Network. Master Thesis. Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society, School of Arts and Communication. Malmö. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-43888
- Meehan, Nicole 2020. ‘Digital Museum Objects and Memory: Postdigital Materiality, Aura and Value’. – Curator, The Museum Journal Wiley Periodical Inc 1–17 doi.org/10.1111/cura.12361.
- Noy, Chaim 2016. ‘Participatory Media New and Old: Semiotics and Affordances of Museum Media’. – Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33, 4, 308–323.
- Parry, Ross 2007. Recoding the Museum: Digital Heritage and the Technologies of Change London & New York: Routledge.
- Proctor, Nancy 2017. ‘The Museum as Distributed Network, a 21st Century Model.’ Museum-ID. https://museum-id.com/museum-distributed-network-21st-century-model-nancy-proctor/ (18 October 2021)
- Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, Pille; Aljas, Agnes 2014. ‘Digital Cultural Heritage: Challenging Museums in Archives and Users Democratising the Museum’ – Pille Runnel, Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt (eds.), Reflections on Participatory Technologies, Frankfurt am Main: PL Academic Research, 163–185.
- Robinson, Helena 2020. ‘Curating good participants? Audiences, Democracy and Authority in the Contemporary Museum’. – Museum Management and Curatorship, 35,5, 470–487.
- Simon, Nina 2010. The Participatory Museum. Santa Cruz, CA: Museum 2.0.
- Taylor, Joel; Gibson, Laura Kate 2017. ‘Digitisation, digital interaction and social media: embedded barriers to democratic heritage’. – International Journal of Heritage Studies 23,5, 408–420.
- Van Dijk, Jose 2014. ‘Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data Between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology’. – Surveillance & Society12,2, 197–208.
- Watson, Steve; Waterton, Emma 2010. ‘Reading the Visual: Representation and Narrative in the Construction of Heritage’. – Material Culture Review 71, 84–97.
- Wilson-Barnao, Caroline 2016. ‘The Personalization of Publicity in the Museum’. – Continuum 30,6, 688–96. doi: 10.1080/10304312.2016.1189649.