Enhancing Online Teaching Methods Through Leadership Innovations

Sharma, Manjari; Gupta, Sharad

doi:10.2478/bsaft-2024-0030

Abstract

This paper explores the crucial role of leadership in enhancing online teaching methods through innovative approaches. As online education becomes increasingly important, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic, effective leadership is vital for addressing both the potential and challenges of digital learning environments. This study emphasizes the integration of advanced technologies such as AI and adaptive learning systems and the importance of inclusive educational strategies. The research also highlights leadership models that foster strategic planning, technological innovation, and inclusivity to improve online education outcomes. Practical recommendations for fostering student engagement, maintaining academic integrity, and addressing the digital divide are discussed. These findings provide a framework for educational leaders to successfully navigate the complexities of online education and to implement technologies that enhance learning experiences for diverse student populations.

References

Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol. 12, Issue 3, 80-97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arnold, K.E., & Pistilli, M.D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 267-270. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330666.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F.O., & Weber, T.J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 60, 421-449. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baldwin, C., Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2017). Online course design in higher education: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments. TechTrends, Vol. 61, Issue 2, 132-139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0125-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, Vol. 2, Issue 2, 113-115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bass, B.M., & Riggio, R.E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press. Bates, A.W. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. Jossey-Bass.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bates, A.W., & Sangrà, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. Jossey-Bass.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bishop, J.L., & Verleger, M.A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, Vol. 30, Issue 9, 1-18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bozkurt, A., et al. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 1-126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bryk, A.S., Gomez, L.M., & Grunow, A. (2010). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. Frontiers in Sociology of Education, 127-162. Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1120-5_7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bryson, J.M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burgstahler, S. (2015). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice. Harvard Education Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 75264-75278. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 11, Issue 1, 19-36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2005.9967137.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Crow, M.M., & Dabars, W.B. (2015). Designing the new American university. JHU Press. Desimone, L.M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, Vol. 38, Issue 3, 181-199. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 9-15. ACM. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, Vol. 49, Issue 1, 5-22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dixson, M.D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 10, Issue 2, 1-13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol. 42, Issue 3, 255-284. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fishman, T. (2017). Academic integrity as an educational concept, concern, and movement in US institutions of higher learning. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, Vol. 43, Issue 2, 1-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2015). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Corwin Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garrison, D.R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garrison, D.R., & Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, Vol. 59, Issue 1, 64-71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heifetz, R.A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hinton, K.E. (2012). A practical guide to strategic planning in higher education. Society for College and University Planning.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hodges, C., et al. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, Vol. 27.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, Vol. 51, Issue 4, 1755-1765. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kahu, E.R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 37, Issue 1, 58-71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuh, G.D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, Vol. 33, Issue 3, 10-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380109601795.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kulik, J.A., & Fletcher, J.D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 86, Issue 1, 42-78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315581420.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 32, Issue 3, 465-491. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lancaster, T., & Good, G. (2010). Academic integrity in e-learning. In Handbook of Distance Education (337-348). Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L.B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mayer, R.E. (2008). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCabe, D.L., Treviño, L.K., & Butterfield, K.D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, Vol. 11, Issue 3, 219-232. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Means, B., et al. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, Vol. 108, Issue 6, 1017-1054. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Northouse, P.G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pane, J.F., Griffin, B.A., McCaffrey, D.F., & Karam, R. (2014). Effectiveness of cognitive tutor algebra I at scale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 36, Issue 2, 127-144. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713507480.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Picciano, A.G. (2011). Educational leadership and planning for technology. Pearson Higher Ed.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Picciano, A.G. (2012). The evolution of big data and learning analytics in American higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 16, Issue 3, 9-20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T.A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, Vol. 147, 103778. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reisdorf, B.C., & Groselj, D. (2017). Digital inclusion and exclusion: The social and cultural implications of the digital divide. In The Oxford Handbook of Cyberpsychology (6-25). Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rose, D.H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rowe, N.C. (2004). Cheating in online student assessment: Beyond plagiarism. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. 7. Issue 2, 1-10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sclater, N. (2017). Learning analytics explained. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Selwyn, N. (2010). Degrees of digital division: Reconsidering digital inequalities and contemporary higher education. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, Vol. 7, Issue 1, 33-42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v7i1.661.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sharples, M., & Domingue, J. (2016). The blockchain and kudos: A distributed system for educational record, reputation and reward. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (490-496). Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_48.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, Vol. 46, Issue 5, 30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., & Zvacek, S. (2015). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. IAP.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 57, Issue 10, 1510-1529. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, C.P., & Freyd, J.J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, Vol. 69, Issue 6, 575-587. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037564.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spillane, J.P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Deursen, A.J., & Van Dijk, J.A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, Vol. 16, Issue 3, 507-526. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, Vol. 34, Issue 4-5, 221-235. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Veletsianos, G. (2010). Emerging technologies in distance education. Athabasca University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Walkington, C. (2013). Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction: The impact of contextualization on transfer of algebraic reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 105, Issue 4, 932-945. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032446.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations. Pearson.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang, P., White, J., Schmidt, D.C., & Lenz, G. (2018). Applying software patterns to address interoperability in blockchain-based healthcare apps. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1706.03700.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Enhancing Online Teaching Methods Through Leadership Innovations

Abstract

Paradigm

My account