Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Structural Equation Modelling for Establishing Empirical Relationship Between Organisational Innovativeness and Sustainability of Construction Firms in Nigeria Cover

Structural Equation Modelling for Establishing Empirical Relationship Between Organisational Innovativeness and Sustainability of Construction Firms in Nigeria

Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. Ali, H. A. E. M, Al-Sulaihi, I. A., and Al-Gahtani, K. S. (2013). Indicators for Measuring Performance of Building Construction Companies in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences, 25(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2012.03.00210.1016/j.jksues.2012.03.002
  2. Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, Evaluation, and Interpretation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
  3. Bowen, F. E., Rostami, M., & Steel, P. (2010). Timing is Everything: A Meta-analysis of the Relationships between Organisational Performance and Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1179–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.01410.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.014
  4. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, 3rd edition. Routledge.10.4324/9781315757421
  5. Chan, I. Y., and Liu, A. M. (2012). Antecedents of Innovation Climate in Construction Firms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Construction Management, 12(4), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2012.1077319910.1080/15623599.2012.10773199
  6. Damanpour, F. (2010). An Integration of Research Findings of Effects of Firm Size and Market Competition on Product and Process Innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x
  7. Doloi, H., Iyer, K. C., and Sawhney, A. (2011). Structural Equation Model for Assessing Impacts of Contractor’s Performance on Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 687–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.05.00710.1016/j.ijproman.2010.05.007
  8. Evangelista, R. and Vezzani, A. (2010). The Economic Impact of Technological and Management Innovations: A Firm-Level Analysis. Research Policy, 39(10), 1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.00410.1016/j.respol.2010.08.004
  9. Gauthier, J., and Wooldridge, B. (2012). Influences on Sustainable Innovation Adoption: Evidence from Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71610.1002/bse.716
  10. Glick, W. H., Washburn, N. T., and Miller, C. C. (2005). The Myth of Firm Performance. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of American Academy of Management. Honolulu, Hawaii.
  11. Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 646–675. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl03310.1093/poq/nfl033
  12. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Edition, 7th Ed. Pearson Education.
  13. Hassan, M. U., Shaukat, S., Nawaz, M. S., and Naz, S. (2013). Effects of Innovation Types on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study on Pakistan’s Manufacturing Sector. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 7(2), 243–262.
  14. Karabulut, A. T. (2015). Effect of Innovation Types on Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 195, 1355–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.32210.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.322
  15. Kazaz, A., Manisali, E., and Ulubeyli, S. (2008). Effect of Basic Motivational Factors on Construction Workforce Productivity in Turkey. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 14(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.410.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.4
  16. Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
  17. Lilja, R. (2009). Negotiated Environmental Agreements in Promoting Material Efficiency in industry – First Steps in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(9), 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.01.00210.1016/j.jclepro.2009.01.002
  18. Love, J. H. and Roper, S. (2015). SME Innovation, Exporting and Growth: A Review of Existing Evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/026624261455019010.1177/0266242614550190
  19. Mafini, C. (2015). Predicting Organisational Performance Through Innovation, Quality And Inter-Organisational Systems: A Public Sector Perspective. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(3), 939–952. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v31i3.922710.19030/jabr.v31i3.9227
  20. Molenaar, K., Washington, S., and Diekmann, J. (2000). Structural Equation Model of Construction Contract Dispute Potential. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(4), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(268)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(268)
  21. Moohammad, A. Y., Aini, Y. N., and Kamal, E. M. (2014). Influences of Firm Size, Age and Sector on Innovation Behaviour of Construction Consultancy Services Organizations in Developing Countries. Business Management Dynamics, 4(4), 01–09.
  22. Rukundo, J. B. (2017). Firm Performance and Innovation in the Developing Countries: Evidence from Firm -Level Survey, Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-1), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c1p710.22495/cocv15i1c1p7
  23. Santos, J. B. and Brito, L. A. L. (2012). Toward a Subjective Measurement Model for Firm Performance. BAR, Braz. Adm. Rev. 9(no. Rio de Janeiro), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-7692201200050000710.1590/S1807-76922012000500007
  24. Shen, L. Y., Tam, W. Y., Tam, L., and Ji, Y.-B. (2010). Project Feasibility Study: the key to Successful Implementation of Sustainable and Socially Responsible Construction Management Practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(3), 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.01410.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.014
  25. Schilling, M. A. (2013). Strategic Management of Technological Innovation. McGraw-Hill.
  26. Shumacker, R. and Lomax, R. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modelling, 2nd edition, Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
  27. Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K and Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An Overview of Sustainability Assessment Methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.01110.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011
  28. Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
  29. Tam, W. Y. V. (2008). On the Effectiveness of Implementing a Waste-Management-Plan Method in Construction. Waste Management, 28(6), 1072–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.00710.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.007
  30. Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., and Devece, C. A. (2011). Management Innovation and Organizational Performance: Mediating Role of Planning and Control. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq04310.1093/jopart/muq043
  31. Yusof, N., Kamal, E. M., Kong-Seng, L., and Iranmanesh, M. (2014). Are Innovations Being Created or Adopted in the Construction Industry? Business Administration and Business Economics, Economic Development, Strategic Management Organizational Theory & Business Policy. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824401455242410.1177/2158244014552424
  32. Zulu, S. L. (2007). The Impact of Project Management Process Quality on Construction Project Performance: A Structural Equation Model. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjreecm-2021-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2255-9671 | Journal ISSN: 2255-9604
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 13
Published on: Jan 29, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Monday Otali, Emmanuel Achuenu, Godwin Idoro, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.