Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Damage to Archaeological Sites: Assessment Criteria and Situation in Latvia Cover

Damage to Archaeological Sites: Assessment Criteria and Situation in Latvia

Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management
Volume 8 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
By:
Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. Amineddoleh, L. (2013). The role of museums in the trade of black market cultural heritage property. Art antiquity and law, XVIII, Issue 2.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Blundo, D. S., Ferrari, A. M., del Hoyo, A. F., Riccardi, M. P., Muiñaa, F. G. (2018). Improving Sustainable Cultural Heritage Restoration Work through Life Cycle Assessment Based Model. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 32, 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.01.008">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.01.00810.1016/j.culher.2018.01.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Brodie, N. (2010). Archaeological Looting and Economic Justice. In P. M. Messenger and G. S. Smith (Eds.), Cultural Heritage Management: A Global Perspective, p. 261–277. https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813034607.003.0021">https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813034607.003.002110.5744/florida/9780813034607.003.0021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Brodie, N., Contreras, D. (2012). The economics of the looted archaeological site of Bâb edh-Dhrâ’: a view from Google Earth. In: Lazrus, P.K. and Barker, A.W. (eds.), All The Kings Horses: Essays on the Impact of Looting and the Illicit Antiquities Trade on our Knowledge of the Past. Society for American Archaeology: Washington, D.C., USA. ISBN 9780932839442
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Cerra, D., Plank, S., Lysandrou, V., Tian, J. (2016). Cultural Heritage Sites in Danger—Towards Automatic Damage Detection from Space. Remote Sensing, 8(9), 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090781">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs809078110.3390/rs8090781
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Chechi, A. (2017/2018). When Private International Law Meets Cultural Heritage Law: Problems and Prospects. In A. Bonomi & G. P. Romano (Eds.) Yearbook of Private International Law, Vol. XIX - 2017/2018, 269–293. Koln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG. https://doi.org/10.9785/9783504386078-014">https://doi.org/10.9785/9783504386078-01410.9785/9783504386078-014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Court Administration, Court work data portal. (n. d.). Statistics on convicted persons. Retrieved from: https://dati.ta.gov.lv/microstrategy/asp/Main.aspx? (in Latvian) (viewed 18.05.2020.)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Dalmas, L., Geronimi, V., Noël, J-F., Sang, J. T. K. (2015). Economic evaluation of urban heritage: An inclusive approach under a sustainability perspective. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 16(5), 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.01.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.01.00910.1016/j.culher.2015.01.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Dans, E. P., González, P. A. (2019). Sustainable tourism and social value at World Heritage Sites: Towards a conservation plan for Altamira, Spain. Annals of Tourism Research, 74, 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.10.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.10.01110.1016/j.annals.2018.10.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. De Beer, J., Boogaard, F., (2017). Good practices in cultural heritage management and the use of subsurface knowledge in urban areas. Procedia Engineering, 209, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.127">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.12710.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.127
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Dieck, M. C. T., Jung, T. H. (2017). Value of Augmented Reality at Cultural Heritage Sites: A Stakeholder Approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.00210.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Dambis, J. (2019). Kultūras pieminekļu aizsardzības sistēma Latvijā. Retrieved from: https://www.lps.lv/uploads/docs_module/4.Dambis_01.02.2019.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Dosi, C. (2001). Environmental values, valuation methods, and natural disaster damage assessment. United Nations, 58 p., LC/L.1552-P, 2001. Retrieved from: https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/5722 (viewed 12.05.2020.)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. European Commission, Eurostat. (2017). EPSAS issue paper on the accounting treatment of heritage assets, EPSAS WG 17/03. Retrieved from: https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/2b041a69-43e0-4c6c-bc83-d03e0e5912e5/Issue%20paper%20on%20heritage%20assets.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Ganciu, I., (2018). Heritage for Sale! The Role of Museums in Promoting Metal Detecting and Looting in Romania. Heritage, 1(2), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage1020029">https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage102002910.3390/heritage1020029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Gill, D. W. J. (2016). Context Matters: The Auction Market and Due Diligence: the Need for Action. Journal of Art Crime, 15, 77–82. Retrieved from: http://oars.uos.ac.uk/151/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Gisselman, F. et al. (2017). Economic values from the natural and cultural heritage in the Nordic countries: Improving visibility and integrating natural and cultural resource values in Nordic countries, Nordic Council of Ministers 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317280524_Economic_values_from_the_natural_and_cultural_heritage_in_the_Nordic_countries_Improving_visibility_and_integrating_natural_and_cultural_resource_values_in_Nordic_countries10.6027/TN2017-522
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Greenland, F., Marrone, J., Topcuoglu, O., Vorderstrasse, T. (2019). A Site-Level Market Model of the Antiquities Trade. International Journal of Cultural Property, 26(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739119000018">https://doi.org/10.1017/S094073911900001810.1017/S0940739119000018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. IR. (2016). Latvija – kapu aplaupītāju “lielvalsts”, 21.07.2016. Retrieved from: https://ir.lv/2016/07/21/zurnals-latvija-kapu-aplaupitaju-lielvalsts/ (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Information centre of the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Latvia. (2019). Criminal statistics on registered criminal offences in Latvia. Retrieved from: https://www.ic.iem.gov.lv/lv/kriminala-statistika
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Kairiss A. (2016). Crime Against Cultural Property: Finding Solutions. In: Przestępczość przeciwko dziedzictwu kulturowemu. Diagnoza, zapobieganie, zwalczanie. Pod redakciją Macieja Trzcińskiego, Olgierda Jakubowskiego. Wroclaw: Beta-druk, pp. 63–76.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Kairiss, A. (2017). Awareness Raising and Protection of Archaeological Heritage. Culture Crossroads, 11, 2017. Retrieved from: http://www.culturecrossroads.lv/pdf/233/en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Latvijas Avīze. (2015). Janvārī nebijušos apmēros izpostīti senkapi (09.02.2015). Retrieved from: https://www.la.lv/latgales-kulturvesturei-nolaupitais (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Latvian Academy of Sciences Economic Institute. (2002). Kultūras pieminekļu īpašnieku attieksme pret kultūras pieminekļu statusu kā apgrūtinājumu. Retrieved from: https://www.km.gov.lv/uploads/ckeditor/files/kultura_timekli/Kulturas_piemineklu_statuss_LZA_EI.pdf (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Lazrak F., Nijkamp P., Rietveld P., Rouwendal J. (2009). Cultural Heritage: Hedonic Prices for Non-market Values. No. 49, Serie Research Memoranda from VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics. Retrieved from http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/20090049.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. LETA. (2019). Ar valsts atbalstu sakopts mantraču izpostītais Latgaļu uzkalniņu kapulauks Ciblas novadā (13.01.2019). Retrieved from: https://www.la.lv/ar-valsts-atbalstu-sakopts-mantracuizpostitais-latgalu-uzkalninu-kapulauks-ciblas-novada
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Li, J., Krishnamurthy S., Roders A. P., Wesemael, P. van. (2020). Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. Cities, 96, 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.10247610.1016/j.cities.2019.102476
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Lrtv.lv. (2019). Veic izpostīto Loginu senkapu arheoloģisko izpēti, 05.09.2019. Retrieved from: http://www.lrtv.lv/zinas/veic-izpostito-loginu-senkapu-arheologisko-izpeti-8516
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Manders M. R., Van Tilburg H. K., Staniforth M. (2012). Unit 6: Significance assessment, UNESCO Bangkok. Retrieved from: http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/images/630X300/UNIT6.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Martins, N. A. (2016). Sustainable Design, Cultural Landscapes and Heritage Parks; the Case of the Mondego River. Sustainable Development, 24(5), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1633">https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.163310.1002/sd.1633
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. McAllister, M. E., & McManamon, F. P. (2007). Technical Brief 20: Archeological Resource Damage Assessment: Legal Basis and Methods. Retrieved from https://www.nps.gov/archeology/pubs/techbr/tchBrf20.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Mendes, I. (2016). Assessing the Values of Archaeological Heritage. Working Paper. Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, WP02/2016/de/socius. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2851797">https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.285179710.2139/ssrn.2851797
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Mourato S., Mazzanti M. (2002). Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage: Evidence and Prospects, Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. Research Report. The Getty Conservation Institute. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Trust. Retrieved from: https://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/assessing.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Munarim, U., Ghisi, E. (2016). Environmental feasibility of heritage buildings rehabilitation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.334">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.33410.1016/j.rser.2015.12.334
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Munzi M., Zocchi A. (2017). The Lepcitanian territory: cultural heritage in danger in war and peace. Libyan Studies, 48, 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/lis.2017.11">https://doi.org/10.1017/lis.2017.1110.1017/lis.2017.11
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Nagle, G. (2016). Vandaļu bizness. IR, 29, 326. Retrieved from: https://ir.lv/2016/07/20/vandalubizness-2/ (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. National Cultural Heritage Board. (2020). Atgādinājums par metāla detektoru lietošanas ierobežojumiem. Retrieved from: https://mantojums.lv/lv/jaunumi/atgadinajums-detektori/ (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Navrud, S. (2005). Valuing cultural heritage – lessons learned. Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture IX, 95–100. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, Vol. 83, WIT Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Nijkamp, P. (2012). Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage. In Licciardi Guido, Amirtahmasebi Rana, The Economics of Uniqueness: Investing in Historic City Cores and Cultural Heritage Assets for Sustainable Development. Urban Development, Washington, DC: World Bank, p.75–106. Retrieved from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/12286
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Nijkamp P., Riganti P. (2004). Valuing Cultural Heritage Benefits to Urban and Regional Development. European Regional Science Association, ERSA conference papers. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23731199_Valuing_cultural_heritage_benefits_to_urban_and_regional_development
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. New Zealand Institute of Economic Research, (2018). What’s the use of non-use values? Non-Use Values and the Investment Statement, 1.02.2018., retrieved from: https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2018-08/LSF-whats-the-use-of-non-use-values.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Osipova, S. (2017). Satversmes tiesas priekšsēdētājas vietnieces Sanitas Osipovas uzruna rakstu krājuma “Vispārējie tiesību principi: tiesiskā drošība un tiesiskā paļāvība: Valsts pārvalde. Bizness. Jurisprudence” atvēršanā. Retrieved from: https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/articles/satversmes-tiesas-priekssedetajas-vietnieces-sanitasosipovas-uzruna-rakstu-krajuma-visparejie-tiesibu-principi-tiesiska-drosiba-un-tiesiskapalaviba-valsts-parvalde-bizness-jurisprudenc/ (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Pūķis, M. (2011). Kultūras mantojuma sociālā un ekonomiskā loma. Retrieved from: https://mantojums.lv/lv/petijumi/ (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Rezevska, D. (2016). Tiesiskās drošības un paļāvības princips – būtiski tiesiskas valsts principa elementi. Retrieved from: http://blogi.lu.lv/tzpi/files/2016/09/REZEVSKA_D_TEZEs.pdf (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Rypkema, D. (2012). Heritage Conservation and Property Values. In Licciardi Guido, Amirtahmasebi Rana, The Economics of Uniqueness: Investing in Historic City Cores and Cultural Heritage Assets for Sustainable Development. Urban Development, Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 107–142. Retrieved from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/12286
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Rodriguez Temiño I. (2019). Assessing Damage to Archaeological Heritage in Criminal and Administrative Proceedings. Heritage, 2(1), 408–434. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2010029">https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage201002910.3390/heritage2010029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Skaties.lv. (2018). Monētas, piekariņi, krustiņi… “Melnie arheologi” turpina biznesu, neskatoties uz kriminālatbildību, 03.03.2018. Retrieved from: https://skaties.lv/zinas/latvija/sabiedriba/monetas-piekarini-krustini-melnie-arheologi-turpinabiznesu-neskatoties-uz-kriminalatbildibu/ (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Suárez-Mansilla M. (2018). Blood Antiquities: a Net Acting in Spain Helped to Finance DAESH through Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Goods. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332100268_Blood_Antiquities_a_Net_Acting_in_Spain_Helped_to_Finance_DAESH_through_Illicit_Trafficking_of_Cultural_Goods
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. State Protected Cultural Monuments Register of the Republic of Latvia. (2016). Retrieved from: https://is.mantojums.lv/ (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Throsby D., (2012), Heritage Economics: A Conceptual Framework. In Licciardi, Guido & Amirtahmasebi, Rana, The Economics of Uniqueness: Investing in Historic City Cores and Cultural Heritage Assets for Sustainable Development. Urban Development, Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 45–74, retrieved from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/12286 (viewed 12.05.2020.)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Torgāns, K. (2006). Saistību tiesības. I daļa. Mācību grāmata. Rīga: Tiesu namu aģentūra, 2006.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Tuan, T. H., Navrud, S. (2007). Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics, 38, 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9056-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9056-510.1007/s10640-006-9056-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Tuan, T. H., Navrud, S. (2008). Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 9(3), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2008.05.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2008.05.00110.1016/j.culher.2008.05.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. TVNET. (2015). Senkapu izlaupītāji Latgalē valstij radījuši vairāk nekā miljonu eiro lielus zaudējumus, 15.03.2015. Retrieved from: https://www.tvnet.lv/5227514/senkapu-izlaupitajilatgale-valstij-radijusi-vairak-neka-miljonu-eiro-lielus-zaudejumus (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Valmieras ziņas. (2019). Kocēnu novadā uzdarbojas “melnie racēji”, 23.09.2019. Retrieved from: https://www.valmieraszinas.lv/vtv-kocenu-novada-uzdarbojas-melnie-raceji/ (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. Van Oers, R. (2015). The Economic Feasibility of Heritage Preservation. In A Companion to Heritage Studies (Eds.), W. Logan, M. N. Craith and U. Kockel. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118486634.ch22">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118486634.ch2210.1002/9781118486634.ch22
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjreecm-2020-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2255-9671 | Journal ISSN: 2255-9604
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 82
Published on: Aug 24, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Archaeological heritage,
cultural heritage,
cultural monuments,
damage assessment,
looting,
socio-economic values
Related subjects:
Architecture and design,
Landscape architecture,
Construction, materials,
Business and economics,
Business management,
Industries,
Real estate,
Engineering,
Civil engineering,
Environmental engineering,
Geosciences,
Geosciences, other

© 2020 Andris Kairišs, Irina Oļevska, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 8 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)Next article