The Process of Informal Spatial Planning: A Literature Overview

Mishra, Ankit

The Process of Informal Spatial Planning: A Literature Overview

Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management

Volume 7 (2019): Issue 1 (January 2019)

By:

Ankit Mishra

Open Access

|Nov 2019

References

Blaschke, T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.00410.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blotevogel, H. H., Danielzyk, R. and Münter, A. (2014). Spatial Planning in Germany: Institutional inertia and new challenges. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Briassoulis, H. (1997). How the others plan: exploring the shape and forms of informal planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X970170020210.1177/0739456X9701700202
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Broeck, P.V.d., Moulaert, F., Kuhk, A., Lievois, E., and Schreurs, J. (2014). Spatial Planning in Flanders Serving a bypassed capitalism? Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carmona, M. (2017). The formal and informal tools of design governance. Journal of Urban Design, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.123433810.1080/13574809.2016.1234338
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Certomà, C., Notteboom B. (2017). Informal planning in a transactive governmentality: Re-reading planning practices through Ghent’s community gardens. Planning Theory, 16(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309521559817710.1177/1473095215598177
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cotella, G. (2014). Spatial Planning in Poland Between European Influence and Dominant Market Forces Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Council of Europe. (1983). 6^th European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning, CEMAT, In Prospects of development and of spatial planning in maritime region. Torremolinos, Spain: 19–20 May.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Damsgaard, O. (2014). The Danish Planning System 1990–2010: Continuity and decay. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Donovan, M.G. (2008). Informal cities and the contestation of public space: The case of Bogotá’s street vendors, 1988–2003. Urban Studies, 45(1), 29–51.10.1177/0042098007085100
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Erkut, G. and Sezgin, E. (2014). Spatial and Strategic Planning in Turkey: Institutional change and new challenges. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Evers, D. (2015). Formal institutional change and informal institutional persistence: the case of Dutch provinces implementing the Spatial Planning Act. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1068/c139110.1068/c1391
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Friedmann, J. (2005). Planning Cultures in Transition. Bishwapriya Sanyal eds. Comparative Planning Cultures. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Geppert, A. (2014). France, Drifting Away from the “Regional Economic” Approach. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Getimis, P. and Giannakourou, G. (2014). The Evolution of Spatial Planning in Greece after the 1990s: Drivers, directions and agents of change. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hanssen, G. S., & Falleth, E. I. (2014). Market-Oriented Urban Planning – Constraining Citizen Participation. Local Government Studies, 40(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.83425410.1080/03003930.2013.834254
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Healey, P. (1999). Institutionalist Analysis, Communicative Planning, and Shaping Places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X990190020110.1177/0739456X9901900201
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Högström, J., Balfors, B., & Hammer, M. (2017). Planning for sustainability in expansive metropolitan regions: exploring practices and planners’ expectations in Stockholm, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 26(3), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.139175110.1080/09654313.2017.1391751
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kušar, S. (2010). Landscape studies informal planning practices: Some evidence from Slovenia. Journal of Landscape Studies, 3(3), 159–165.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leibenath, M., Wirth, P., & Lintz, G. (2016). Just a talking shop? – Informal participatory spatial planning for implementing state wind energy targets in Germany. Utilities Policy, 41, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.00810.1016/j.jup.2016.02.008
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lemke, T. (2000) Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Paper presented at the Rethinking Marxism Conference, University of Amherst, Amherst, MA, 21–24 September.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lingua, V. and Servillo, L. (2014). The Modernization of The Italian Planning System. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Loepfe, M., & Eisinger, A. (2017). Assemblages for Urban Transformation. disP - The Planning Review, 53(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2017.131652610.1080/02513625.2017.1316526
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lutzoni, L. (2016). In-formalised urban space design. Rethinking the relationship between formal and informal. City Territ Archit, 3(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-016-0046-910.1186/s40410-016-0046-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maier, K. (2014). Changing Planning in The Czech Republic. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mäntysalo, R., Jarenko, K., Nilsson, K. L. & Saglie, I-L. (2015). Legitimacy of Informal Strategic Urban Planning Observations from Finland, Sweden and Norway. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.86180810.1080/09654313.2013.861808
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McFarlane, C. & Waibel, M. (eds.). (2012). Urban Informalities: Reflections on the Formal and Informal. London: Ashgate.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nadin, V. and Stead, D. (2014). Spatial Planning in The United Kingdom, 1990–2013. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Needham, B. (2005). The New Dutch spatial planning act: Continuity and change in the way in which the Dutch regulate the practice of spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 20(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269745060056866210.1080/02697450600568662
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Newman, P. and Thornley, A. (1996). The National Framework: Planning Systems. In Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects, pp. 27–75.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
North, D. C. (1990). An introduction to institutions and institutional change. In Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678.00310.1017/CBO9780511808678.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Papamichail, T. and Perić, A (2017). Informal Planning: Towards Promoting Resilient Governance in Greece. International conference on Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions, SSPCR 2017, 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_3510.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_35
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peric, A. & Hoch, C. (2017). Spatial planning across European planning systems and social models: A look through the lens of planning cultures of Switzerland, Greece and Serbia. Proceedings: AESOP 2017 Conference “Spaces of Dialog for Places of Dignity: Fostering the European Dimension of Planning”.https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-00022662710.3929/ethz-b-000226627
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reimer, M. (2013). Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning. Sustainability, 5(11), 4653–4673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su511465310.3390/su5114653
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roy, A. (2009). Strangely Familiar: Planning and the Worlds of Insurgence and Informality. Planning Theory, 8(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520809929410.1177/1473095208099294
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sari, H.K. and Mäntysalo, R. (2014). The Recent Development of The Finnish Planning System The city of Vantaa as an executor, fighter and independent actor. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sartorio, F. S. (2005). Strategic Spatial Planning A Historical Review of Approaches, its Recent Revival, and an Overview of the State of The Art in Italy. disP - The Planning Review, 41(162). https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2005.1055693010.1080/02513625.2005.10556930
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scholl, B. (2017). Building Actor Relationships and Alliances for Complex Problem Solving in Spatial Planning: The Test Planning Method. disP - The Planning Review, 53(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2017.131654410.1080/02513625.2017.1316544
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scholl, B., Vinzens, M. and Staub, B. (2013). Test Planning – A Method with a Future: Main features and information on the practical application of the test planning process using Riedholz/Luterbach as an example.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Syssner, J, Meijer, M. (2017). Informal Planning in Depopulating Rural Areas: A resource-based view on informal planning practices. European Countryside, 9(3), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-002710.1515/euco-2017-0027
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2012). Formal/Informal Dialectics and the Self-Transformation of Spatial Planning Systems. Administration & Society, 46(6), 654–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539971246919410.1177/0095399712469194
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zonneveld, W. and Evers, D. (2014). Dutch National Spatial Planning at The End of An Era. Edited: Mario Reimer, et al. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article