Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome DUE to Non-Coding Variation in the Androgen Receptor Gene: Review of the Literature and Case Report of a Patient with Mosaic c.-547C&gt;T Variant

Noveski, P; Plaseski, T; Dimitrovska, M; Plaseska-Karanfilska, D

doi:10.2478/bjmg-2023-0012

Abstract

Sexual development (SD) is a complex process with strict spatiotemporal regulation of gene expression. Despite advancements in molecular diagnostics, disorders of sexual development (DSD) have a diagnostic rate of ~50%. Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) represents the most common form of 46,XY DSD, with a spectrum of defects in androgen action. Considering the importance of very strict regulation of the SD, it is reasonable to assume that the genetic cause for proportion of the DSD lies in the non-coding part of the genome that regulates proper gene functioning. Here we present a patient with partial AIS (PAIS) due to a mosaic de novo c.-547C>T pathogenic variant in the 5′UTR of androgen receptor (AR) gene. The same mutation was previously described as inherited, in two unrelated patients with complete AIS (CAIS). Thus, our case further confirms the previous findings that variable gene expressivity could be attributed to mosaicism. Mutations in 5′UTR could create new upstream open reading frames (uORFs) or could disrupt the existing one. A recent systematic genome-wide study identified AR as a member of a subset of genes where modifications of uORFs represents an important disease mechanism. Only a small number of studies are reporting non-coding mutations in the AR gene and our case emphasizes the importance of molecular testing of the entire AR locus in AIS patients. The introduction of new methods for comprehensive molecular testing in routine genetic diagnosis, accompanied with new tools for in sillico analysis could improve the genetic diagnosis of AIS, and DSD in general.

References

Kyriakou A, Lucas-Herald AK, McGowan R, Tobias ES, and Ahmed SF. Disorders of sex development: advances in genetic diagnosis and challenges in management. Advances in Genomics and Genetics. 2015; 5: 165–177.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eggers S, Sadedin S, van den Bergen JA, Robevska G, Ohnesorg T, Hewitt J, et al. Disorders of sex development: insights from targeted gene sequencing of a large international patient cohort. Genome Biol. 2016; 17(1): 243.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Batista RL, Costa EMF, Rodrigues AS, Gomes NL, Faria JA, Jr., Nishi MY, et al. Androgen insensitivity syndrome: a review. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 62(2): 227–235.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boehmer AL, Brinkmann O, Brüggenwirth H, van Assendelft C, Otten BJ, Verleun-Mooijman MC, et al. Genotype versus phenotype in families with androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86(9): 4151–60.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gottlieb B, Beitel LK, Nadarajah A, Paliouras M, and Trifiro M. The androgen receptor gene mutations database: 2012 update. Hum Mutat. 2012; 33(5): 887–94.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Camats N, Flück CE, and Audí L. Oligogenic Origin of Differences of Sex Development in Humans. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(5).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boehmer AL, Brinkmann AO, Nijman RM, Verleun-Mooijman MC, de Ruiter P, Niermeijer MF, et al. Phenotypic variation in a family with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome explained by differences in 5alpha dihydrotestosterone availability. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86(3): 1240–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Köhler B, Lumbroso S, Leger J, Audran F, Grau ES, Kurtz F, et al. Androgen insensitivity syndrome: somatic mosaicism of the androgen receptor in seven families and consequences for sex assignment and genetic counseling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90(1): 106–11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hornig NC, de Beaufort C, Denzer F, Cools M, Wabitsch M, Ukat M, et al. A Recurrent Germline Mutation in the 5′UTR of the Androgen Receptor Causes Complete Androgen Insensitivity by Activating Aberrant uORF Translation. Plos one. 2016; 11(4): e0154158.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Noveski P, Terzic M, Vujovic M, Kuzmanovska M, Sukarova Stefanovska E, and Plaseska-Karanfilska D. Multilevel regression modeling for aneuploidy classification and physical separation of maternal cell contamination facilitates the QF-PCR based analysis of common fetal aneuploidies. Plos one. 2019; 14(8): e0221227.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plaseski T, Noveski P, Trivodalieva S, Efremov GD, and Plaseska-Karanfilska D. Quantitative fluorescent-PCR detection of sex chromosome aneuploidies and AZF deletions/duplications. Genetic testing. 2008; 12(4): 595–605.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Noveski P, Madjunkova S, Sukarova Stefanovska E, Matevska Geshkovska N, Kuzmanovska M, Dimovski A, et al. Loss of Y chromosome in peripheral blood of colorectal and prostate cancer patients. Plos one. 2016; 11(1): e0146264.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang X, Wakeling M, Ware J, and Whiffin N. Annotating high-impact 5′untranslated region variants with the UTRannotator. Bioinformatics. 2021; 37(8): 1171–1173.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GR, Thormann A, et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 2016; 17(1): 122.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baetens D, Mendonça BB, Verdin H, Cools M, and De Baere E. Non-coding variation in disorders of sex development. Clin Genet. 2017; 91(2): 163–172.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soukarieh O, Meguerditchian C, Proust C, Aïssi D, Eyries M, Goyenvalle A, et al. Common and Rare 5′UTR Variants Altering Upstream Open Reading Frames in Cardiovascular Genomics. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9: 841032.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whiffin N, Karczewski KJ, Zhang X, Chothani S, Smith MJ, Evans DG, et al. Characterising the loss-of-function impact of 5′ untranslated region variants in 15,708 individuals. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1): 2523.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Calvo SE, Pagliarini DJ, and Mootha VK. Upstream open reading frames cause widespread reduction of protein expression and are polymorphic among humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(18): 7507–12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee DSM, Park J, Kromer A, Baras A, Rader DJ, Ritchie MD, et al. Disrupting upstream translation in mRNAs is associated with human disease. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1): 1515.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen S, Francioli LC, Goodrich JK, Collins RL, Kanai M, Wang Q, et al. A genome-wide mutational constraint map quantified from variation in 76,156 human genomes. bioRxiv. 2022: 2022.03.20.485034.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holterhus PM, Brüggenwirth HT, Hiort O, Kleinkauf-Houcken A, Kruse K, Sinnecker GH, et al. Mosaicism due to a somatic mutation of the androgen receptor gene determines phenotype in androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997; 82(11): 3584–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gottlieb B and Trifiro MA. Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome [Updated 2017 May 11]. In: Adam MP, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1429/. 1993.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Batista RL, Yamaguchi K, Rodrigues ADS, Nishi MY, Goodier JL, Carvalho LR, et al. Mobile DNA in Endocrinology: LINE-1 Retrotransposon Causing Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019; 104(12): 6385–6390.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ono H, Saitsu H, Horikawa R, Nakashima S, Ohkubo Y, Yanagi K, et al. Partial androgen insensitivity syndrome caused by a deep intronic mutation creating an alternative splice acceptor site of the AR gene. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 2287.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kalinchenko NY, Petrov VM, Panova AV, and Tiulpakov AN. [A deep intronic mutation in AR gene causing androgen insensitivity syndrome: difficulties of diagnostics]. Probl Endokrinol (Mosk). 2021; 67(5): 48–52.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brüggenwirth HT, Boehmer AL, Ramnarain S, Verleun-Mooijman MC, Satijn DP, Trapman J, et al. Molecular analysis of the androgen-receptor gene in a family with receptor-positive partial androgen insensitivity: an unusual type of intronic mutation. Am J Hum Genet. 1997; 61(5): 1067–77.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Känsäkoski J, Jääskeläinen J, Jääskeläinen T, Tommiska J, Saarinen L, Lehtonen R, et al. Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome caused by a deep intronic pseudoexon-activating mutation in the androgen receptor gene. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 32819.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Miller DE, Lee L, Galey M, Kandhaya-Pillai R, Tischkowitz M, Amalnath D, et al. Targeted long-read sequencing identifies missing pathogenic variants in unsolved Werner syndrome cases. J Med Genet. 2022; 59(11): 1087–94.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Miller DE, Sulovari A, Wang T, Loucks H, Hoekzema K, Munson KM, et al. Targeted long-read sequencing identifies missing disease-causing variation. Am J Hum Genet. 2021; 108(8): 1436–1449.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome DUE to Non-Coding Variation in the Androgen Receptor Gene: Review of the Literature and Case Report of a Patient with Mosaic c.-547C>T Variant

Abstract

Paradigm

My account