Have a personal or library account? Click to login

“We’ve opened pandora’s box, haven’t we?” clinical geneticists’ views on ethical aspects of genomic testing in neonatal intensive care

By:
T Arsov  
Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute. Fact sheet: The cost of sequencing a human genome. 2019 September 2019]; Available from: https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Sequencing-Human-Genome-cost
  2. van Nimwegen, K.J., et al., Is the $1000 genome as near as we think? A cost analysis of next-generation sequencing. Clin Chem, 2016. 62(11): p. 1458-1464.
  3. Retterer, K., et al., Clinical application of wholeexome sequencing across clinical indications. Genet Med, 2016. 18(7): p. 696-704.
  4. Wright, C.F., D.R. FitzPatrick, and H.V. Firth, Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children. Nat Rev Genet, 2018. 19(5): p. 253-268.
  5. Lionel, A.C., et al., Improved diagnostic yield compared with targeted gene sequencing panels suggests a role for whole-genome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test. Genet Med, 2018. 20(4): p. 435-443.
  6. Meng, L., et al., Use of exome sequencing for infants in intensive care units: Ascertainment of severe single-gene disorders and effect on medical management. JAMA Pediatr, 2017. 171(12): p. e173438.
  7. Willig, L.K., et al., Whole-genome sequencing for identification of Mendelian disorders in critically ill infants: a retrospective analysis of diagnostic and clinical findings. Lancet Respir Med, 2015. 3(5): p. 377-387.
  8. Elliott, A.M., et al., RAPIDOMICS: rapid genomewide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit-successes and challenges. Eur J Pediatr, 2019. 178(8): p. 1207-1218.
  9. Gubbels, C.S., et al., Prospective, phenotype-driven selection of critically ill neonates for rapid exome sequencing is associated with high diagnostic yield. Genet Med, 2019.
  10. van der Sluijs, P.J., et al., Putting genome-wide sequencing in neonates into perspective. Genet Med, 2019. 21(5): p. 1074-1082.
  11. Miller, N.A., et al., A 26-hour system of highly sensitive whole genome sequencing for emergency management of genetic diseases. Genome Med, 2015. 7: p. 100.
  12. Farnaes, L., et al., Rapid whole-genome sequencing decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization. NPJ Genom Med, 2018. 3: p. 10.
  13. Stark, Z., et al., Meeting the challenges of implementing rapid genomic testing in acute pediatric care. Genet Med, 2018. 20: p. 1554-1563.
  14. Stark, Z., et al., Prospective comparison of the cost-effectiveness of clinical whole-exome sequencing with that of usual care overwhelmingly supports early use and reimbursement. Genet Med, 2017. 19(8): p. 867-874.
  15. Stark, Z., et al., Does genomic sequencing early in the diagnostic trajectory make a difference? A follow-up study of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Genet Med, 2019. 21: p. 173-180.
  16. Amendola, L.M., et al., Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Am J Hum Genet, 2016. 98(6): p. 1067-1076.
  17. Bland, A., et al., Clinically impactful differences in variant interpretation between clinicians and testing laboratories: a single-center experience. Genet Med, 2018. 20(3): p. 369-373.
  18. American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Medical Genetics, Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Pediatrics, 2013. 131(3): p. 620-622.
  19. Botkin, J.R., et al., Points to consider: Ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet, 2015. 97(1): p. 6-21.
  20. Newson, A.J. and L. Schonstein, Genomic testing in the paediatric population: Ethical considerations in light of recent policy statements. Mol Diagn Ther, 2016. 20(5): p. 407-14.
  21. Ross, L.F., et al., Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Genet Med, 2013. 15(3): p. 234-245.
  22. Deem, M.J., Whole-genome sequencing and disability in the NICU: Exploring practical and ethical challenges. Pediatrics, 2016. 137 Suppl 1: p. S47-55.
  23. Gyngell, C., et al., Rapid challenges: ethics and genomics in neonatal intensive care. Paediatrics, 2019. 143(Suppl 1): p. S14-21.
  24. Wilkinson, D.J., et al., Genomic intensive care: should we perform genome testing in critically ill newborns? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016. 101(2): p. F94-98.
  25. Frankel, L.A., S. Pereira, and A.L. McGuire, Potential psychosocial risks of sequencing newborns. Pediatrics, 2016. 137 Suppl 1: p. S24-29.
  26. Szego, M.J., et al., Views from the clinic: Healthcare provider perspectives on whole genome sequencing in paediatrics. Eur J Med Genet, 2019. 62(5): p. 350-356.
  27. Knapp, B., C. Decker, and J.D. Lantos, Neonatologists’ attitudes about diagnostic whole-genome sequencing in the NICU. Pediatrics, 2019. 143(Suppl 1): p. S54-S57.
  28. Stark, Z., et al., Attitudes of Australian health professionals towards rapid genomic testing in neonatal and paediatric intensive care. Eur J Hum Genet, 2019. 27(10): p. 1493-1501.
  29. Braun, V. and V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 2006. 3(2): p. 77-101.
  30. Mays, N. and C. Pope, Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ, 1995. 311(6997): p. 109-112.
  31. Mays, N. and C. Pope, Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ, 2000. 320(7226): p. 50-52.
  32. Morley, G., et al., What is ‘moral distress’? A narrative synthesis of the literature. Nurs Ethics, 2019. 26(3): p. 646-662.
  33. Dive, L. and A.J. Newson, Reconceptualizing Autonomy for Bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J, 2018. 28(2): p. 171-203.
  34. Burke, K. and A. Clarke, The challenge of consent in clinical genome-wide testing. Arch Dis Child, 2016. 101(11): p. 1048-1052.
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 12
Published on: Mar 1, 2023
Published by: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 T Arsov, published by Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.