Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Incitement to Hatred. Comparative Analysis of Legislative Consolidation and Practical Application Cover

Incitement to Hatred. Comparative Analysis of Legislative Consolidation and Practical Application

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Abrams, Floyd. Speaking Freely: Trials of the First Amendment. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2005.
  2. Altenhain, Karsten. Commentary on §130 StGB. In Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, edited by Harald Ostendorf, 5th ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017.
  3. Cahen, Marie-Isabelle. Incitement to Racial Hatred (Incitation à la Haine Raciale). 2022.
  4. Crenshaw, Kimberlé. “Reaffirming Racism: The Faulty Logic of Colorblindness, Remedy and Diversity.” In The Power of Talking Back (2013).
  5. Dershowitz, Alan. The Case Against the New Censorship: Protecting Free Speech from Big Tech, Progressives, and Universities. New York: Skyhorse, 2021.
  6. Kühl, Kristian. Strafgesetzbuch, Kommentar. 26th ed. (2007).
  7. MacKinnon, Catharine. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
  8. Matt, Holger, Jörg Renzikowski (eds.). Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar. 2nd ed. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2020.
  9. Ostendorf, Harald (ed.). NomosKommentar Strafgesetzbuch. 5th ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017.
  10. Sternberg-Lieben, Dieter, Uwe Schittenhelm. Schönke/Schröder Strafgesetzbuch. 2019.
  11. Strossen, Nadine. Speaking of Race, Speaking of Sex: Hate Speech, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties. New York: New York University Press, 1996.
  12. Waldron, Jeremy. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.
  13. Belavusau, Uladzislau (2014). Hate Speech and Constitutional Democracy in Eastern Europe: Transitional and Militant? (Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland). Israel Law Review 47(1): 27–61.
  14. Gelber, Katharine. “Hate Speech—Definitions & Empirical Evidence.” Constitutional Commentary 32 (2017): 559–79 // https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/559
  15. Hochmann, Thomas. “La haine n’est pas une opinion.” Revue des droits de l’homme No. 8 (2015) // https://journals.openedition.org/revdh/1135
  16. Le Pourhiet, Anne-Marie. “La prolifération des délits d’opinion en droit pénal français.” Les Petites Affiches No. 40 (February 25, 2015): 8.
  17. Mitsch, Wolfgang. “Der unmögliche Zustand des § 130 StGB.” Kriminalpolitische Zeitschrift (2018) // https://kripoz.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/mitsch-derunmoegliche-zustand-des-130-stgb-1.pdf
  18. Stajnko, Jure, David Siter, Luka M. Tomažič. “Discrimination, Freedom of Expression and Two Concepts of Liberty: Assessing European Legislation Criminalizing Hate Speech.” Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies 65, No. 1 (2024): 1–22.
  19. Tourkochoriti, Ionna. “Should Hate Speech Be Protected: Group Defamation, Party Bans, Holocaust Denial and the Divide Between France, Europe and the United States.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 45(3) (2014): 552–622.
  20. Holtz, Martin. “Deutsche als “Köterrasse” beschimpft: Warum die Staatsanwaltschaft keine Volksverhetzung sieht.” Der Spiegel (January 28, 2021. // https://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/hamburg-deutsche-als-koeterrasse-beschimpft-keine-volksverhetzung-a-1136813.html
  21. Bayer, Judit, Petra Bárd. Hate speech and hate crime in the EU and the evaluation of online content regulation approaches. European Parliamentary Research Service (2020).
  22. Free Word Centre. “Hate Speech” Explained: A Toolkit. London: Free Word Centre, 2015 // https://www.article19.org/data/files/medialibrary/38231/’Hate-Speech’-Explained---A-Toolkit-%282015-Edition%29.pdf
  23. Gutauskas, Aurelijus. “Application of Administrative Liability Would Help Combat Hate Speech in the Online Space.” Lietuvos teismai (2022) // https://www.teismai.lt/lt/teisejas-aurelijus-gutauskas-administracines-atsakomybes-taikymas-padetu-kovoti-su-neapykantos-kalba-internetineje-erdveje/10036
  24. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Signed November 4, 1950. Council of Europe.
  25. Constitution of the Republic of Poland (Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej). Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 78, item 483 (1997).
  26. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Rabat Plan of Action on the Prohibition of Advocacy of National, Racial or Religious Hatred that Constitutes Incitement to Discrimination, Hostility or Violence. (October 5, 2012): 3–5 // https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Opinion/Seminars/Rabat_draft_outcome.pdf
  27. Civil Code of the Republic of Poland (Kodeks cywilny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej).
  28. Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania (Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamasis kodeksas). No. VIII-1968, 2000, Lithuania.
  29. French Penal Code (Code pénal français). Journal Officiel de la République Française (1994).
  30. German Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch, StGB). Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt, BGBl. I), 1871, last amended 2023.
  31. Law of December 18, 1998, on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation. Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) item 1575 (2016).
  32. Penal Code of the Republic of Poland (Kodeks karny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej). Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 88, item 553 (1997).
  33. Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, Petition No. 41288/15. European Court of Human Rights, January 14, 2020 // https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200344
  34. Zemmour v. France, Application No. 63539/19. European Court of Human Rights, December 20, 2022.
  35. BayObLG. Beschluss [Decision] of 19 October 2023, Az. 207 StRR 325/23. Germany, 2023.
  36. BGH. Beschluss des 3. Strafsenats [Decision of the 3rd Criminal Senate] of 14 April 2015, Az. 3 StR 602/14. Germany, 2015.
  37. BGH. Beschluss des 3. Strafsenats [Decision of the 3rd Criminal Senate] of 28 July 2016, Az. 3 StR 149/16. Germany, 2016.
  38. BGH. Urteil des 3. Strafsenats [Judgment of the 3rd Criminal Senate] of 14 March 1984, Az. 3 StR 36/84. Germany, 1984.
  39. BGH. Urteil des 3. Strafsenats [Judgment of the 3rd Criminal Senate] of 27 July 2017, Az. 3 StR 172/17. Germany, 2017.
  40. BGH. Urteil des 1. Strafsenats [Judgment of the 1st Criminal Senate] of 12 December 2000, Az. 1 StR 184/00. Germany, 2000.
  41. BVerfG. Beschluss [Decision] of 9 November 2011, Az. 1 BvR 461/08. Germany, 2011.
  42. BVerfG. Beschluss [Decision] of 22 June 2018, Az. 1 BvR 673/18. Germany, 2018.
  43. BVerwG. Urteil des 6. Senats [Judgment of the 6th Senate] of 26 April 2023, Az. 6 C 8.21. Germany, 2023.
  44. Bundesgerichtshof. Urteil vom 3. April 2008, 3 StR 394/07. HRRS 2008 Nr. 458. Accessed July 27, 2025. http://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/3/07/3-str-394-07.php.
  45. OLG Brandenburg. Urteil vom 28 November 2001, Az. 1 Ss 52/01, NJW 2002. Germany, 2001.
  46. OLG Köln. Urteil vom 9 Juni 2020, Az. III-1 RVs 77/20. Germany, 2020.
  47. OLG Stuttgart. Urteil vom 19 Mai 2009, Az. 2 Ss 1014/09. Germany, 2009.
  48. Cour de cassation [Court of Cassation], Chambre criminelle [Criminal Chamber], 3 décembre 1991, Bull. crim. 1991 n° 458, Pourvoi n° 90-86.763. France, 1991 // https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichJuriJudi.do?idTexte=JURI-TEXT000007067110
  49. Cour de cassation [Court of Cassation], Chambre criminelle [Criminal Chamber], 12 septembre 2000, Pourvoi n° 98-88.201, Inédit. France, 2000 // https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000007584923/
  50. Cour de cassation [Court of Cassation], Chambre criminelle, 15 octobre 2019, Pourvoi n° 18-85.365, Inédit. France, 2019 // https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000039285274/
  51. Court of Appeals in Warsaw. Judgment of 20 April 2015, file ref. II AKa 26/15. Poland, 2015.
  52. Polish Supreme Court. Decision of 5 February 2007, file ref. IV KK 406/06. Poland, 2007.
  53. Cassation Ruling in Criminal Case, No. 2K­86­648/2016. Supreme Court of Lithuania [Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas], 2016.
  54. Cassation Ruling in Criminal Case, No. 2K­206­693/2017. Supreme Court of Lithuania [Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas], 2017.
  55. Cassation Ruling in Criminal Case, No. 2K-58-489/2024. Supreme Court of Lithuania [Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas], 2024.
  56. Cassation Ruling in Criminal Case, No. 2K677/2012. Supreme Court of Lithuania [Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas], 2012.
  57. Kauno apylinkės teismo byla 1A-831-319-2013 (Kaunas District Court Case 1A­831­319­2013). Lithuania, 2013.
  58. Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo 1997 m. lapkričio 13 d. nutarimas (Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of November 13, 1997). Lithuania, 1997.
  59. Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo 2005 m. lapkričio 10 d. nutarimas (Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of November 10, 2005). Lithuania, 2005.
Language: English
Page range: 117 - 139
Submitted on: Sep 7, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 29, 2026
Published on: Mar 9, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Vladimir Komarnickiy, Daniel Gotthardt, Maksim Pleshkov, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.