Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Application of Large Language Models in Enforcing Prohibitions against Hate Speech in Lithuanian Cover

The Application of Large Language Models in Enforcing Prohibitions against Hate Speech in Lithuanian

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Aleknaitė, Viltė. “The qualification problem of incitement against any nation, race, ethnic, religious or other group of people in Lithuanian criminal law.” Teisės apžvalga / Law Review 28 (2023): 131–156.
  2. Artificial Analysis. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index // https://artificialanalysis.ai/models (accessed 2025-12-13)
  3. Babbel. How Many People Speak English, And Where is it Spoken? // https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/how-many-people-speak-english-and-where-isit-spoken?
  4. Bai, Yuntao. “Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback.” arXiv (2022): 1–34 // https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073
  5. Bilius, Mindaugas, Žaneta Navickienė, Vilius Velička. “Hate crimes: Evaluation of Lithuanian courts’ decisions in the light of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 14(1) (October 2021): 22–47 // https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2021-0002
  6. Bozkurt, Aras, Ramesh C. Sharma. “Generative AI and prompt engineering: The art of whispering to let the genie out of the algorithmic world.” Asian Journal of Distance Education 18(2) (2023).
  7. Bozkurt, Aras. “Tell Me Your Prompts and I Will Make Them True: The Alchemy of Prompt Engineering and Generative AI.” Open Praxis 16(2) (2024): 111–118 // doi: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.661
  8. Butkienė, Rita et al. “Lithuanian Hate Speech Corpus v.1.” CLARIN-LT digital library in the Republic of Lithuania (2025) // http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11821/69
  9. Chen, Shouyuan, Sherman Wong, Liangjian Chen, Yuandong Tian. “Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Positional Interpolation.” arXiv (2023): 1–18 // https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15595
  10. Chrysostomou, George, Zhixue Zhao, Miles Williams, Nikolaos Aletras. “Investigating hallucinations in pruned large language models for abstractive summarization.” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 12 (2024): 1163–1181 // https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00695
  11. Civinini, Maria Giuliana. “The perks of using AI tools in the justice domain.” JuLIA Handbook Artificial Intelligence, Judicial Decision-Making and Fundamental Rights (2024): 20-37 // https://ssm-italia.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/JuLIA_handbook-Justice_final.pdf
  12. Contini, Francesco. “Unboxing generative AI for the legal professions: Functions, impacts, and governance.” International Journal for Court Administration 15(2) (2024): 1–22 // https://iacajournal.org/articles/10.36745/ijca.604
  13. Cossion, Manuel. „A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in Large Language Models.“ arXiv (2025) // https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01781v1
  14. Council of Europe. European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) General Policy Recommendation No. 15 on combating hate speech of 8 December 2015.
  15. Council of Europe. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). European Ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment. (2018) // https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/196205/COUNCIL%20OF%20EUROPE%20-%20European%20Ethical%20Charter%20on%20the%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20judicial%20systems.pdf
  16. Council of Europe. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Reflections of the AIAB on the use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems. (2025) // https://rm.coe.int/cepej-aiab-2025-1rev5-en-reflections-of-the-aiab-on-the-use-of-artific/1680b42a56
  17. Council of Europe. Recommendation CM/Rec(2022)16 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on combating hate speech of 20 May 2022.
  18. Dadurkevičius, Virginijus, Andrius Utka. “Estimating the Amount of Lithuanian Text Indexed by Global Search Engines.” Baltic Journal of Modern Computing 10 (2022) // doi: 10.22364/bjmc.2022.10.3.06
  19. Dahl, Matthew, Varun Magesh, Mirac Suzgun, Daniel E Ho. “Large legal fictions: Profiling legal hallucinations in large language models.” Journal of Legal Analysis 16(1) (2024): 64–93 // https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laae003
  20. Dao, Tri et al. “FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness.” arXiv (2022): 1–34 // https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14135
  21. DeepSeek-AI, Daya Guo, et al. “DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning.” arXiv (2025): 1–22 // https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12948
  22. European Commission. Project Be Hate-Free: Building Hate-Free Communities in Lithuania (Be Hate-Free) // https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/how-to-participate/org-details/925243619/project/963662/program/31076817/details
  23. European Commission. The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice // https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/contents-code-gpai
  24. European Parliament. Hate speech and hate crime in the EU and the evaluation of online content regulation approaches. (2020) // https://data.europa.eu/ doi/10.2861/28047
  25. Farquhar, Sebastian, Jannik Kossen, Lorenz Kuhn, Yarin Gal. “Detecting hallucinations in large language models using semantic entropy.” Nature 630 (2024): 625–630 // https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07421-0
  26. Gagliardone, Iginio, Danit Gal, Thiago Alves, Gabriela Martinez. “Countering online hate speech.” UNESCO Publishing (2015): 1–71 // https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233231
  27. García-Díaz, José Antonio, Ronghao Pan, Rafael Valencia-García. “Leveraging Zero and Few-Shot Learning for Enhanced Model Generality in Hate Speech Detection in Spanish and English.” Mathematics 11, No. 24, 5004 (December 2023): 1-19 // https://doi.org/10.3390/math11245004.
  28. Gless, Sabine. “AI in the Courtroom: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Evidence in Criminal Trials.” Georgetown University Law Center 51 (2020): 195–253 // doi: 10.5451/UNIBAS-EP76669
  29. Guliakaitė-Danisevičienė, Monika. Neapykantos kalba Lietuvoje: situacijos ir atsisakymų pradėti ikiteisminius tyrimus apžvalga. (2023) // https://lt.efhr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/NEAPYKANTOS-KALBA-LIETUVOJE.pdf
  30. Gupta, Priya, Sachin Gupta. “Hate Speech Detection using OpenAI and GPT-3.” International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, Vol. 12, Issue 5 (May 2022): 132–138 // doi: 10.46338/ijetae0522_15
  31. Hoffmann, Jordan, et al. “Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models.” arXiv (2022): 1–36 // https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.15556
  32. Herasimenkienė, Gintarė, Miglė Keturkienė. (2021). “Neapykantos kalbos vertinimo gairės”: 258–266. In: Š. Zachar, J. Meteńko, M. Meteńková (eds.), Zborník príspevkov: 17. medzinárodný kongres kriminalistika a forenzné vedy: veda, vzdelávanie, prax, 16–17 September 2021, Bratislava, Slovenská Republika. Akadémia Policajného zboru v Bratislave.
  33. Huang, Fan, Haewoon Kwak, Jisun An. “Is ChatGPT better than human annotators? Potential and limitations of ChatGPT in explaining implicit hate speech.” Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference (March 2023): 294–297 // https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.07736
  34. Ji, Ziwei, et al. “Survey of hallucination in natural language generation.” ACM Computing Surveys 55(12) (2023): 1–38 // https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730
  35. JuLIA (101046631) Justice, fundamentaL rIghts and Artificial intelligence. Handbook Artificial Intelligence, Judicial Decision-Making and Fundamental Rights. (2024) // https://ssm-italia.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/JuLIA_handbook-Justice_final.pdf
  36. Kalai, Adam Tauman, et al. “Why Language Models Hallucinate.” arXiv (2025) // https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04664
  37. Kankevičiūtė, Eglė, Milita Songailaitė, Justina Mandravickaitė. “Neapykantos kalbos atpažinimas lietuviškuose komentaruose panaudojant dirbtinį intelektą.” Vilniaus universiteto atvirosios serijos (May 2023): 26–34 // https://doi.org/10.15388/LMITT.2023.3
  38. Kaplan, Jared, et al. “Scaling laws for neural language models.” arXiv (2020): 1–30 // https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361
  39. Katz, Daniel Martin, Michael James Bommarito, Shang Gao, Pablo Arredondo. “GPT-4 passes the bar exam.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 382(2243) (2024): 1–17 // https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0254
  40. Kostiuk, Yevhen, et al. “Towards Multilingual LLM Evaluation for Baltic and Nordic languages: A study on Lithuanian History.“ arXiv (2025): 1–11 // https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.09154
  41. Leviathan, Yaniv, Matan Kalman, Yossi Matias. “Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding.” arXiv (2022): 1–13 // https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.17192
  42. Lewis, Partick, et al. “Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks.” Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2020): 1–16 // https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/file/6b-493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Paper.pdf
  43. Mandravickaitė, Justina, et al. “Exploring hate speech detection models for Lithuanian language.” Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) (2025): 206–218.
  44. McGowan, Alessia, et al. “ChatGPT and Bard exhibit spontaneous citation fabrication during psychiatry literature search.” Psychiatry Research 326, 115334 (2023): // https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115334
  45. Mikša, Katažyna, Monika Guliakaitė. “Neapykantos nusikaltimai ir neapykantos kalba: situacijos Lietuvoje apžvalga.” (2020) // https://lt.efhr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NEAPYKANTOS-NUSIKALTIMAI-IR-NEAPYKANTOS-KALBA-SITUACIJOS-LIETUVOJE-AP%C5%BDVALGA.pdf
  46. Mikulėnienė, Danguolė, Agnė Čepaitienė. “Lithuanian Dialect Classifications.” Dialectologia Special issue 11 (2023): 207–235 // doi: 10.1344/DIALECTOLOGIA2023.2023.8
  47. Murauskienė, Dovilė, Raimundas Jurka, Jolanta Zajančkauskienė. “The instigation of hatred: Questions of legal evaluation and procedural issues.” Entrepreneur-ship and Sustainability Issues 8(2) (2020): 896–913 // https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(54)
  48. NCSC. AI & the courts: Judicial and legal ethics issues // https://www.ncsc.org/resources-courts/ai-courts-judicial-and-legal-ethics-issues
  49. O’Connor, Sadie. “Generative AI.” Georgetown Law Technology Review 8(2) (2024): 394–404 // https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/generative-ai/GLTR-05-2024/
  50. Olla, Phillip, et al. “Promptology: Enhancing Human–AI Interaction in Large Language Models.” Information 15(10), 634 (2024) // https://doi.org/10.3390/info15100634
  51. Ouyang, Long et al. “Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback.” arXiv (2022): 1–68 // https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02155
  52. Pan, Ronghao, José Antonio García-Díaz, Rafael Valencia-García. “Comparing fine-tuning, zero and few-shot strategies with large language models in hate speech detection in English.” Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences 140(3) (July 2024): 2849–2686 // https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2024.049631
  53. Pan, Ronghao, José Antonio García-Díaz, Rafael Valencia-García. “Leveraging Zero and Few-Shot Learning for Enhanced Model Generality in Hate Speech Detection in Spanish and English.” Mathematics 11, No. 24, 5004 (December 2023): 16 // https://doi.org/10.3390/math11245004
  54. Patil, Rajvardhan, Thomas F. Heston, Vijay Bhuse. “Prompt engineering in health-care.” Electronics 13(15), 2961 (2024): 1–26 // https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13152961
  55. Pengfei, Liu et al. “Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing.” arXiv (2021): 1–46 // https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.13586
  56. Pierce, Natalie, Stephanie Goutos. “Why lawyers must responsibly embrace generative AI.” Berkeley Business Law Journal 21(2) (2024): 1–51 // https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4477704
  57. Pimienta, Daniel. “Is it true that more than Half of Web Contents are in English? Not if Multilingualism is Paid Due Attention!” Forum for Linguistic Studies 6(5) (2024): 201–212 // doi: 10.30564/fls.v6i5.7144
  58. Plesevičius, Dominykas. Large Language Models for Lithuanian Language. Master’s thesis. VU, 2025.
  59. Rafailov, Rafael, et al. “Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model.” arXiv (2023) // https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18290v3
  60. Ruzaitė, Jūratė. “In search of hate speech in Lithuanian public discourse: A corpus-assisted analysis of online comments.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14(1): 93–116 // https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0005
  61. Ruzaitė, Jūratė. Neapykantos kalba: Monografija (Hate speech: Monograph). Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, 2024 // https://doi.org/10.7220/9786094676109
  62. Ruzaitė, Jūratė. “Neapykantos kalba: medijų raštingumas iš lingvistinės perspektyvos”: 166–188. In: Auksė Balčytienė, ed. Artimas tolimas medijų pasaulis: virsmai, ribos ir būdai tai suprasti. Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, 2024 // https://doi.org/10.7220/9786094676253
  63. Saleem, Haji Mohammad, Kelly P Dillon, Susan Benesch, Derek Ruths. “A web of hate: Tackling hateful speech in online social spaces.” arXiv (2017) // https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.10159
  64. Schick, Timo, et al. “Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools.” arXiv (2023): 1–17 // https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761
  65. Sclar, Melanie, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane Suhr. “Quantifying Language Models’ Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting.” arXiv (2024): 1–29 // https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.11324
  66. Shao, Minghao, Abdul Basit, Ramesh Karri, Muhammad Shafique. “Survey of Different Large Language Model Architectures: Trends, Benchmarks, and Challenges.” IEEE Access 12 (2024): 188664–188706 // http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ ACCESS.2024.3482107
  67. Smith, Craig S. Hallucinations could blunt ChatGPT’s success – IEEE spectrum. (2023) // https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-hallucination
  68. The Encyclopedia Britannica. Lithuanian language. // https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lithuanian-language
  69. The European Bars Federation New Technologies Commission. European lawyers in the era of ChatGPT. Guidelines on how lawyers should take advantage of the opportunities offered by large language models and gene. (2023) // https://www.fbe.org/nt-commission-guidelines-on-generative-ai/
  70. Trad, Fouad, Ali Chehab. “Prompt Engineering or Fine-Tuning? A Case Study on Phishing Detection with Large Language Models.” Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 6(1) (2024): 367–384 // https://doi.org/10.3390/make6010018
  71. Vaswani, Ashish, et al. “Attention Is All You Need.” Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2017): 1–11 // https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c-1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf
  72. Velásquez-Henao, Juan David, Carlos Jaime Franco-Cardona, Lorena Cadavid-Higuita. “Prompt Engineering: a methodology for optimizing interactions with AI-Language Models in the field of engineering.” DYNA 90 (230) (2023): 9–17 // https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v90n230.111700
  73. Vidaus reikalų ministerija. Ataskaita apie neapykantos nusikaltimų ir neapykantos kalbos situaciją Lietuvoje 2020–2021 m. (2022) // https://vrm.lrv.lt/uploads/vrm/documents/files/LT_versija/Viesasis_saugumas/2020_2021%20ataskaita%20d%C4%97l%20neapykantos%20kalbos%20ir%20neapykantos%20nusikaltim%C5%B3.pdf
  74. Vytautas Magnus University. Features of hate speech and criteria for its identification: A linguistic and legal analysis. // https://www.vdu.lt/cris/entities/project/5eae72bf-e195-487a-b908-c9a835d15535
  75. Wang, Brydon T. “Prompts and Large Language Models: A New Tool for Drafting, Reviewing and Interpreting Contracts?” Law, Technology and Humans 6(2) (2024): 88–106 // https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.3483
  76. Wang, Han, et al. “Evaluating GPT-3 generated explanations for hateful content moderation.” Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence AI for Good (IJCAI-23) (2023): 6255–6263 // https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/694
  77. Walter, Yoshija. “Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education.” International Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education 21, 15 (2024): 1–29 // https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
  78. Webson, Albert, Ellie Pavlizk. “Do prompt-based models really understand the meaning of their prompts?” arXiv (2022) // https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.01247
  79. White, Jules, et al. “A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with ChatGPT.” arXiv (2023): 1–19 // https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11382
  80. Xu, Yuemei, et al. “A survey multilingual large language models: corpora, alignment, and bias.” Front. Comput. Sci. 19, 1911362 (2025) // https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-40579-4
  81. Yamin, Muhammad Mudassar, Ehtesham Hashmi, Mohib Ullah, Basel Katt. “Applications of LLMs for generating cyber security exercise scenarios.” IEEE Access (2024): 1–17 // https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3970015/v1
  82. Zhang, Hua. “The Evidentiary Value of AI-Generated Data: A Framework for Reliability and Admissibility.” Education and Social Work 2(2) (2025): 34–41 // https://doi.org/10.63313/ESW.9074
  83. Zheng, Wang. “Research on generative artificial intelligence legal profession substitution.” Journal of Modern Law Research 4(3) (2023): 32–40 // doi: 10.37420/j.mlr.2023.017.
  84. Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania. European Court of Human Rights (Second Section) (2020, Application No. 41288/15).
  85. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania conclusion No. KT37-12/2024 in case No. 20/2023 of 25 April 2024 on the actions of Seimas member Remigijus Žemaitaitis.
  86. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Lithuania, Official Gazette (2002, No. 37-1341).
  87. Office of the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Lithuania. Recommendations on the Methodological Recommendations on the Pre-Trial Investigations concerning Hate Crimes and Hate Speech. (2023) // https://www.prokuraturos.lt/data/public/uploads/2023/09/20230726_neapykantos_nusikaltimai_rekomendacijos.pdf
  88. Perinçek v. Switzerland. European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) (2015, Application No. 27510/08).
  89. Sanchez v. France. European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) (2023, Application No. 45581/15).
  90. Supreme Court of Lithuania case No. 2K-91-976/2018 of 13 March 2018.
  91. Supreme Court of Lithuania case No. 2K-58-489/2024 of 1 March 2024.
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 116
Submitted on: Nov 3, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 17, 2025
Published on: Mar 9, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Milita Songailaitė, Aušrinė Pasvenskienė, Paulius Astromskis, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.