References
- Besson, Samantha. “The Truth about Legal Pluralism.” EuConst Vol. 8 (2012): 354‒361.
- Bradley, Anthony W., Ziegler, Katia S., and Baranger, Denis. Constitutionalism and the Role of Parliaments. Oxford: Hart, 2007.
- Brennan, William J. “The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification.” S. Tex. L. Rev. 27 (1986): 433–445.
- Brünneck von, Alexander. “Comment: Difference and Democracy from the Constitutional Law Perspective”: in: Kolja Rabe and Annika Sattler (eds.), Difference and Democracy. Exploring Potentials in Europe and Beyond. Frankfurt/New York: Campus, 2011, 77–82.
- Clam, Jean. “What is a Crisis?”: in: Poul F. Kjaer, Gunther Teubner and Alberto Febbrajo (eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective. The Dark Side of Functional Differentation. Oxford: Hart, 2011, 189–217.
- Corrias, Luigi. “Populism in a Constitutional Key: Constituent Power, Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Identity.” EuConst 12 (2016): 6–26.
- Crouch, Colin. The Strange Non-Death of Neo-Liberism. Cambridge: Polity, 2011.
- Federal Constitutional Court, 17 January 2017. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 611.
- Gentile, Giovanni. “Fascismo (dottrina del).” Enciclopedia Italiana Vol. XIV, 835 ff, Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana, 1932, 830–850.
- Grimm, Dieter. “The Concept of Constitution in Historical Perspective (1990).” Constitutionalism. Past, Present, and Future. Oxford: OUP, 2016, 89–124.
- Guéhenno, Jean-Marie. La fin de la démocratie. Paris: Flammarion, 1993.
- Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusets: MIT Press, 1996.
- Hasebe, Yasuho, and Pinelli, Cesare. “Constitutions”: in: Mark Tushnet, Thomas Fleiner and Cheryl Saunders (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law. London and New York: Routledge, 2013, 9–19.
- Hay, Colin, Gerry Stoker and Andy Williamson. Revitalising politics: have we lost the plot? Hansard Society, 5‒6 November 2008.
- Hermet, Guy. Les populismes dans le monde. Une histoire sociologique. XIXe–XXe siècle. Paris: Fayard, 2001.
- Howse, Robert. “Epilogue: in defense of disruptive democracy – A critique of anti-populism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 17, Issue 2 (2019): 641–660.
- Huq, Aziz, and Tom Ginsburg. “How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy.” UCLA L. Rev. Vol. 65 (2018): 78–165.
- Kircheimer, Otto. “The Transformation of Western European Party Systems”: in: Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton University Press, 1966, 177–200.
- Krisch, Nico. Beyond Constitutionalism. The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford: OUP, 2010.
- Krouwel, Andre. “Otto Kircheimer and the Catch-All Party.” West European Politics Vol. 26, Issue 2 (2003): 31–40.
- Kuo, Ming-Sung. “Against instantaneous democracy.” I•CON 17 (2019): 554–576.
- Landau, David. “Abusive Constitutionalism.” University of California Vol. 47, Issue 1 (2013): 185–210.
- Mény, Yves. “Elite vs People”: in: Giuliano Amato, Benedetta Barbisan and Cesare Pinelli (eds.), Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy. Oxford: Hart, 2021, 121–136.
- Mény, Yves, and Yves Surel. Par le peuple, pour le peuple. Paris: Fayard, 2000.
- Moffitt, Benjamin. “The Populism/Anti-Populism Divide in Western Europe.” Democratic Theory Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2018): 1–16.
- Müller, Jan Werner. “Reflections on Europe’s “Rule of Law Crises”: in: Poul F. Kjaer and Niklas Olson (eds.), Critical Theories of Crisis in Europe. From Weimar to the Euro. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016, 150–172.
- Pap, Andras. “Who Are “We the People”? Biases and Preferences in the Hungarian Fundamental Law”: in: Zsuzsanna Fejes, Fanni Mandák & Zoltán Szente (eds.), Challenges and Pitfalls in the Recent Hungarian Constitutional Development. Discussing the New Fundamental Law of Hungary. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2015, 53–75.
- Pinelli, Cesare. “The Combination of Negative with Positive Constitutionalism in Europe.” European Journal of Law Reform 1 (13) (2011): 31–39.
- ________. “The Formation of a Constitutional Tradition in Continental Europe since World War II.” European Public Law Vol. 22, Issue 2 (2016): 257–268.
- ________. “The Double Fiction of the People”: in: Giuliano Amato, Benedetta Barbisan and Cesare Pinelli (eds.), Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy. Oxford: Hart, 2021, 137–155.
- Pirang, Alexander. “Renaissance of Militant Democracy?” (27 March 2017) // www.lawfareblog.com
- Ricoeur, Paul. Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil, 1990.
- Rosenfeld, Michel. “Constitutional Identity”: in: Michel Rosenfeld and Andras Sajó (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: OUP, 2013, 756–776.
- Rubenfeld, Jed. Freedom and Time. A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. Boston: Yale University Press, 2001.
- Schuldt, Lasse. “Mixed Signals of Europeanization: Revisiting the NPD Decision in Light of the European Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence.” German Law Journal Vol. 19, Issue 4 (01 July 2018): 817–844.
- Stanley, Ben. “The thin ideology of populism.” Journal of Political Ideologies Vol. 13, Issue 1 (2008): 95–110.
- Tóth, Gabor Attila. “Constitutional Markers of Authoritarianism.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law Vol. 11, Issue 1 (2019): 37–61.
- Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: CUP, 1995.
- Voßkuhle, Andreas. “Demokratie und Populism.” Der Staat Vol. 57, Issue 1 (2018): 119–134.