References
- Ackerman, Bruce. We the People. Foundations. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1991.
- Atienza, Manuel. Konstytucjonalizm, globalizacja, prawo // https://bip.brpo.gov.pl/pliki/12421353110
- Bartole, Sergio. “International Constitutionalism and conditionality. The experience of the Venice Commission.” Rivista AIC 4 (2014): 1–9.
- Blokker, Paul. “Populism as a constitutional project.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17(2) (2019): 536–553.
- Buquicchio, Gianni, Simona Granata-Menghini. “The Venice Commission twenty years on. Challenge met but new challenges ahead.” In: Marjolein van Roosmalen, Ben Vermeulen, Fried van Hoof and Merten Oostling (eds.), Fundamental Rights and Principles – Liber amicorum Pieter van Dijk. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland. Intersentia, 2013.
- Drinóczi, Tímea, Agnieszka Bień-Kacała. “Illiberal Constitutionalism: The Case of Hungary and Poland.” German Law Journal 20 (2019).
- Gatmaytan, Dante B. “Can Constitutionalism Constrain Constitutional Change?” Northwestern interdisciplinary law review 22(3) (2010): 22–38.
- Halmai, Gábor. “A Coup Against Constitutional Democracy the Case of Hungary.” The rule of law revolution of 1989 and the Constitutional Counter–Revolution” after 2010 // https://me.eui.eu/gabor–halmai/wp–content/uploads/sites/385/2018/06/Chapter–15–Halmai–Hungary.pdf
- Garlicki, Leszek. Sądy a Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. (2016) // https://konstytucyjny.pl/wp–content/uploads/2017/02/ps_2016_07_007_Garlicki.pdf
- Jackson, Vicki C. “What’s in a Name? Reflections on Timing, Naming, and Constitution–Making.” William & Mary Law Review 49 (2008): 1249–1305.
- Jóźwicki, Władysław, Ultra vires and constitutional identity control – apples and oranges or two drops of water? Some remarks on the possible role of the New Mixed Chamber of the Court of Justice in the context of the “sequential” model of adjudication on art. 4(2) TUE. Verfassungsblog (2020) // https://verfassungsblog.de/ultra–vires–and–constitutional–identity–control–apples–and–oranges–or–two–drops–of–water/
- Keleman, R. Daniel, Laurent Pech. Why autocrats love constitutional identity and constitutional pluralism. Lessons from Hungary and Poland, working paper No. 2 (September 2018) // http://icedd.luiss.it/files/2019/02/Why–autocrats–love–constitutional.pdf
- Landau, David. “Abusive Constitutionalism.” UC Davis Law Review 47 (2013): 189–260.
- Loewenstein, Karl. “Constitutions and constitutional law in the West and in the East.” The Indian Journal of Political Science, 30(3) (1969): 203–248.
- McConnell, Michael W. “The forgotten constitutional moment.” Constitutional Commentary 11 (1994): 115–144 // https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/749
- Petaux, Jean. Democracy and Human Rights for Europe. The Council of Europe’s Contribution. Council of Europe Publishing, 2009.
- Schmitt, Carl. “Nauka o konstytucji.” Teologia polityczna. Warszawa, 2013.
- Sekhniashvili, Elene. Economic consequences of the Constitutional Control and the Impact of the Constitutional Justice on the Transition al. Economy in Georgia; Constitutional Court as Political Actor in the Political System // https://www.academia.edu/16076200/Economic_Consequences_of_the_Constitutional_Control_and_the_Impact_of_the_Constitutional_Justice_on_the_Transitional_Economy_in_Georgia_Constitutional_Court_as_Political_Actor_in_the_Political_System
- Suchocka, Hanna. “Zmieniająca się funkcja idei tożsamości konstytucyjnej.” Rządy prawa jako wartość uniwersalna. Księga Jubileuszowa Profesora Krzysztofa Wójtowicza. red. A. Kozłowski. Wrocław, 2022, 229–239.
- Suchocka, Hanna. “Moment Konstytucyjny jako „uzasadnienie” zmiany Konstytucji. Kilka refleksji w kontekście doświadczeń Komisji Weneckiej.” Z prawem ustrojowym porównawczym przez ponad półwiecze. Księga Jubileuszowa dedykowana profesorowi Marianowi Grzybowskiemu z okazji 55–lecia pracy naukowej. Red. nauk. B. Przywora, A. Rogacka-Łukasik, K. Skotnicki. Uniwersytet Human-istyczno-Przyrodniczy im. Jana Długosza, 2022, 119–133.
- Suchocka, Hanna, “The Venice Commission and the making of Constitutions in the Central and Eastern European Countries.” Revista General de Derecho Constitucional 30 (2019).
- Suchocka, Hanna. “Geneza i ewolucja bezpośredniego stosowania Konstytucji RP.” Studia Prawnicze 226(2) (2022): 9–29.
- Zajadło, Jerzy. Felietony gorszego sortu, o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym i nie tylko. Wyd. Arche. Sopot, 2017.
- Zakrzewska, Janina. Spór o konstytucje. Warszawa, 1993.
- Zubik, Marek. “O „grzechach społecznych” przeciwko ustawie zasadniczej.” Państwo i Prawo 1 (2018): 3–23.
- Constitutional Tribunal of Poland. Ruling of 7 October 2021 (K 3/21).
- Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. Judgment of the Second Senate of 5 May 2020 – 2 BvR 859/15 – 2 BvR 1651/15 – 2 BvR 2006/15 – 2 BvR 980/16.
- Opinion on the compatibility with Constitutional principles and the Rule of Law of actions taken by the Government and the Parliament of Romania in respect of other State institutions and on the Government emergency ordinance on amendment to the Law N° 47/1992 regarding the organisation and functioning of the Constitutional Court and on the Government emergency ordinance on amending and completing the Law N° 3/2000 regarding the organisation of a referendum of Romania, Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 93rd Plenary Session (Venice, 14–15 December 2012) ((CDL–AD (2012)026).
- Opinion on the Draft Law on the Review of the Constitution of Romania, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 98th Plenary Session (Venice, 21–22 March 2014) (CDL–AD (2014) 010).
- Opinion on the new Constitution of Hungary adopted by the Venice Commission at its 87th Plenary Session (Venice, 17–18 June 2011) (CDL–AD (2011) 016).
- Opinion on three legal questions arising in the process of drafting the New Constitution of Hungary – Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th Plenary Session (Venice, 25–26 March 2011) (CDL–AD (2011) 001).
- Parameters on the Relationship between the Parliamentary Majority and the Opposition in a Democracy: a checklist, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 119th Plenary Session (Venice, 21–22 June 2019) and endorsed by the Committee of Ministers on 5 February 2020 (CDL–AD (2019) 015).
- Report on the role of the opposition in a democratic Parliament, adopted by the Venice Commission, at its 84th Plenary Session (Venice 15–16 October 2010) (CDL–AD (2010) 025).
- Report on the rule of law – Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th plenary session (Venice, 25–26 March 2011) (CDLAD (2011) 003rev.).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2025-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 13
Published on: Jul 17, 2025
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 Hanna Suchocka, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.