References
- Andenæs, Mads Tønnesson, Burkhard Hess and Paul Oberhammer. Enforcement agency practice in Europe. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2005.
- Beliūnienė, Lina, et al. “Galimybės siaurinti teismo funkcijas administracinių teisės pažeidimų procese.” Vilnius: Lietuvos teisės institutas, 2014.
- Bell, Felicity, et al. AI Decision-Making and the Courts: A Guide for Judges, Tribunal Members and Court Administrators. Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration, 2023 // https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4162985
- Beriain, Iñigo De Miguel. “Does the use of risk assessments in sentences respect the right to due process? A critical analysis of the Wisconsin v. Loomis ruling.” Law, Probability and Risk 17, 1 (2018): 45–53 // https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgy001
- Cavallini, Daniela. State Liability for Judicial Wrongs: Impact of Rulings of the European Court of Justice and Debate in Italy in The Culture of Judicial Independence in a Globalised World. Brill | Nijhoff, 2016.
- Chroust, Anton-Hermann. “The Function of Law and Justice in the Ancient World and the Middle Ages.” Journal of the History of Ideas 7, 3 (1946): 298–320 // https://doi.org/10.2307/2707403
- Cui, Yadong. Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Modernization. Singapore: Springer, 2020 // https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9880-4
- Freeman, Michael D. A. and Dennis Lloyd Lloyd of Hampstead. Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. 9 ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2014.
- Kasap, Gizem Halis. “Can Artificial Intelligence (,AI‘) Replace Human Arbitrators? Technological Concerns and Legal Implications.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2 (2021): 209–254 // https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jdisres2021&i=226
- Lazar, Seth, and Jake Stone. “On the Site of Predictive Justice.” Noûs, (2024) // https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12477
- Dahl, Matthew, et al. Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models. (2024) arxIV:2401.01301 // https://arxiv.org/html/2401.01301v1
- Niesel, Zoe. “Machine Learning and the New Civil Procedure.” Smu Law Review 73 (s. a.).
- Nelson, Gregory S. “Bias in Artificial Intelligence.” North Carolina Medical Journal 80 (2019): 4 // https://ncmedicaljournal.com/article/55108.pdf
- Olmo Rodriguez, Pablo J. “Artificial Intelligence Law: Applications, Risks & Opportunities.” Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico 90, 3 (2021): 701–720 // https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/rjupurco90&i=735
- Posner, Richard A. “The Role of the Judge in the Twenty-First Century.” Boston University law review 86 (s. a.).
- Pound, Roscoe. “Justice According to Law.” Columbia Law Review 13, 8 (1913): 696–713 // https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/clr13&i=740
- Russell, Stuart J., Peter Norvig, Ernest Davis. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2010.
- Shields, Allison C. “Emotional Intelligence versus Artificial Intelligence Frontlines: Simple Steps.” Law Practice 45, 4 (2019): 14–15 // https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lwpra45&i=257
- Surden, Harry. “Artificial Intelligence and Law: An Overview.” Rochester, NY, 2019 // https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3411869
- Tamanaha, B. Z. “Law as a Means to an End.” Cambridge University Press, 2006. In Michael D. A. Freeman, Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. 9 ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2014.
- Xu, Zichun. “Human Judges in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities.” Applied Artificial Intelligence 36, 1 (2022): 2013652 // https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2021.2013652
- Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe. Considerations On The Legal Aspects Of Artificial Intelligence (2020) // https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/IT_LAW/ITL_Guides_recommendations/EN_ITL_20200220_CCBE-considerations-on-the-Legal-Aspects-of-AI.pdf
- Denisov v. Ukraine. European Court of Human Rights [GC], 2018, Application No. 76639/11.
- European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. 2022–2025 CEPEJ Action plan: “Digitalisation for a better justice” Adopted at the 37th CEPEJ plenary meeting Strasbourg and online. (2021) // https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2021-12-encepej-action-plan-2022-2025-digitalisation-justice/1680a4cf2c
- European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment. (2018) // https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c
- European Commision. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending certain union legislative acts. (2021), COM/2021/206 // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0206
- European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment, adopted at the 31st plenary meeting of the CEPEJ. (2018) // https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c
- European Parliament. Legislative resolution of 13 March 2024 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union Legislative Acts (2024), COM(2021)0206 – C9-0146/2021 – 2021/0106(COD) TA/2024/0138 // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=EP%3AP9_TA%282024%290138
- European Parliament. Position on with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2024/of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No. 300/2008, (EU) No. 167/2013, (EU) No. 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) // https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/seance_pleniere/textes_adoptes/definitif/2024/03-13/0138/P9_TA(2024)0138_EN.pdf
- European Network of Councils for the Judiciary. Ljubljana Declaration Courts fit for the future. (2023) // https://pgwrk-websitemedia.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/production/pwk-web-encj2017-p/Ljubljana%20declaration%20ADOPTED%2012.06.2023.pdf
- İlhan v. Turkey. European Court of Human Rights, 2000, Application No. 22277/93.
- Khanna, B. Predictive Justice: Using Ai For Justice (2021) // https://www.cppr.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/PREDICTIVE-JUSTICE-USING-AI-FOR-JUSTICE-2.pdf
- Mata v. Avianca Inc. United States District Court. S.D. New York, 2023, 22-CV-1461 (PKC).
- Nada v. Switzerland. European Court of Human Rights [GC], 2012, Application No. 10593/08.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. (2019) // https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
- Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence. 2022, COM/2022/496.
- Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of June 8, 2006.
- Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of March 15, 2008.
- Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of November 15, 2013.
- State v. Klaipėda City Municipality. Supreme Court of Lithuania, 2011, No. 3K-3-207/2011.
- State v. Loomis. Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 2016, 881 N.W.2d 749.
- Zhang v. Chen. The Supreme Court of British Columbia, 2024 BCSC 285.