Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Withdrawal from a Human Rights Treaty and Peremptory Norms of International Law: The case of “Belarus 2020” Cover

Withdrawal from a Human Rights Treaty and Peremptory Norms of International Law: The case of “Belarus 2020”

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Amnesty International. “Unacceptably Limiting Human Rights Protection.” (March 1999) // https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/amr050011999en.pdf
  2. Aust, Anthony. Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd edn. CUP: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  3. Bialiatski, Ales. “The Nobel Peace Lecture.” (December 2022) // https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2022/bialiatski/lecture/".
  4. Belarusian And International Civil Society. “Belarusian authorities must not withdraw Belarus from First Optional Protocol of the ICCPR.” (August 2022) // https://humanrightshouse.org/statements/belarusian-authorities-must-not-withdraw-belarus-from-first-optional-protocol-of-the-iccpr/
  5. Belgium v. Senegal, Judgment, I.C.J., 2012, ICJ GL No 144.
  6. Binder, Christina, & Hofbauer, Jan. “The Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle or the Limits of Interpretation”: 58–77. In: The Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Judgment and Its Contribution to the Development of International Law. Brill, 2020.
  7. Cassese, Antonio. International Law. Oxford University Press, 2005.
  8. Coppen, Tom. “Good faith and withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty.” Question of International Law, QIL, Zoom in 2 (2014): 21–33 // http://www.qilqdi.org/good-faith-and-withdrawal-from-the-non-proliferation-treaty/
  9. Council of Europe, Statute, European Treaty Series – 1949, Nos 1/6/7/8/11.
  10. David, Arie. The Strategy of Treaty Termination: Lawful Breaches and Retaliations. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.
  11. Dissenting Opinion of Judge Tanaka, South West Africa, Judgement of 18 July 1066. ICJ Reports (1966): 298 // https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/47/047-19660718-JUD-01-06-EN.pdf
  12. Donnelly, Jack. “International human rights: a regime analysis.” International Organizations 40 (1986): 599–642.
  13. “Draft conclusion on identification and legal consequences of peremptory norms of general international law. International Law Commission.” Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II, Part Two (2022): 17–89.
  14. European Union. Belarus: Statement by the High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell on the constitutional referendum. (February 2022)// https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/belarus-statement-high-representativevice-president-josep-borrell-constitutional-referendum_en.
  15. Hahn, Hugo J. “Continuity in the Law of International Organization.” Duke Law Journal, Vol. 2 (1962): 379–423.
  16. Helfer, Laurence. “Terminating Treaties”: 634–649. In: Duncan Hollis, ed., The Oxford Guide to Treaties. Oxford University Press, 2012.
  17. Helfer, Laurence. “Exiting Treaties.” Virginia Law Review 91, (2005): 1579–1648.
  18. Human Rights House Foundation. Petition “Belarusian authorities must not withdraw Belarus from First Optional Protocol of the ICCPR.” (August 2022) // https://humanrightshouse.org/statements/belarusian-authorities-must-not-withdraw-belarus-from-first-optional-protocol-of-the-iccpr/
  19. IWPR (Institute for war and peace reporting). Belarusian citizens denied justice at home may no longer be able to appeal to a last resort committee. (October 2022) // https://iwpr.net/global-voices/belarus-leave-un-human-rights-body.
  20. Klein, Eckart. “Denunciation of Human Rights Treaties and the Principle of Reciprocity”: 477–487. In: Ulrich Fastenrath and et al., eds,. From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma. Oxford, 2011.
  21. Laptsevich v. Belarus. CCPR/C/68/D/780/1997, UN Human Rights Committee. (April 2000) // https://www.refworld.org/cases,HRC,3f588efe3.html
  22. Lauterpacht, Hersch. The Development of International Law by the International Court. Cambridge University Press, 1958.
  23. Naldi, Gino & Magliveras, Konstantinos. “Human Rights and the Denunciation of Treaties and Withdrawal from International Organisations.” Polish Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 33 (2013): 95–127.
  24. OMCT (World Organization against Torture). Briefing of the on Belarus. 100 days of ongoing human rights crisis Facts & Figures. (December 2020) // https://www.omct.org/en/annual-report-2020/belarus.
  25. OSCE. Rapporteur under the Moscow Mechanism Professor Dr. Benedek W. Report on Alleged Human Rights Violations related to the Presidential Elections of 9 August 2020 in Belarus. (November 2020) // https://www.osce.org/odihr/469539
  26. “Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes.” United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 596 (1963): 487.
  27. “Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, United Nations.” Treaty Series, Vol. 999 (1966): 171 // https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3bf0.html
  28. Pocar, Fausto.“Some Remarks on the Continuity of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law Treaties”: 279–294. In: Enzo Cannizzaro, ed., The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention. Oxford Academic, 2011.
  29. Reinhold, Steven. “Good Faith in International Law.” UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 2(1)(2013): 40–63.
  30. “Belarus referendum approves proposal to renounce non-nuclear status – agencies.” Reuters (February, 2022) // https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/launchpad-russias-assault-ukraine-belarus-holds-referendum-renounce-non-nuclear-2022-02-27
  31. Rosenne, Shabtai. Breach of Treaty. Cambridge: Grotius publications, 1985.
  32. Russo, Debohra. “Procedural obligations and good faith: the case of the human rights treaties.” Question of International Law, QIL. ZOOM in 2, (2014): 35–44.
  33. Scheuner, Ulrich. “Conflict of Treaty Provisions with a Peremptory Norm of General International Law and its Consequences. Comments on Art. 50, 61 and 67 of the ILC´s. Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties.” Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (1967): 520–532 // http://www.zaoerv.de
  34. Schiffrin, Natalia. “Jamaica Withdraws the Right of Individual Petition under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.” American Journal of International Law 92(3) (1998): 563–568 // doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2997931
  35. Tomuschat, Christian. “General International Law: A New Source of International Law?”: 185–204. In: Global Justice, Human Rights and the Modernization of International Law. Springer, 2018.
  36. Ulyashyna, Liudmila. “Individual v. State: Submissin, equality, conflict?”: 15–40. In: Individual v. State: Practice on Complaints with the United Nations treaty bodies with regard to the Republic of Belarus. Vilnius, 2014 // http://humanrightshouse.org/noop-media/documents/21937.pdf
  37. Ulyashyna, Liudmila. International Legal Standards in the Human Rights Regime and their realization (in Russian: Mezdunarodnye standarty v oblasti prav cheloveka i ih realisacija). Vilnius, EHU, 2013.
  38. United Nations. Charter of the United Nations, 1945, No. 1, UNTS XVI.
  39. UN. Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Report “On The Promotion And Protection Of Human Rights.” E/CN.4/2000/2, E/ CN.2/1999/54 (August, 1999) // https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f4ac4.html
  40. UN. Human Rights Committee (HRC). CCPR General Comments “Continuity of Obligations.” CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.8/Rev.1, No. 26 (1997) // https://www.ref-world.org/docid/453883fde.html
  41. UN. Human Rights Council. Resolution “On human rights situation in Belarus in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election and in its aftermath.” No. A/HRC/ RES/49/26. (April 1, 2022) // https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G22/303/52/PDF/G2230352.pdf?OpenElement
  42. UN. Special Rapporteur on situation with human rights in Belarus “Situation of human rights in Belarus.” No. A/77/195 (July 2022) // https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N22/432/95/PDF/N2243295.pdf?OpenElemen
  43. UN. Press-relies of treaties bodies. Belarus’ withdrawal from individual complaints procedure is a serious setback for human rights protection, UN Human Rights Committee says. (November, 2022) // https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2022/11/belarus-withdrawal-individual-complaints-procedure-serious-setback-human
  44. UN. High Commissioner for Human Rights. Belarus in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election and in its aftermath. No. A/HRC/49/71 (2022) // https://daccess-ods.un.org/tmp/1728628.27777863.html
  45. UN. Human Rights Council. Resolution “On the situation of human rights in Belarus in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election and in its aftermath.” No. A/HRC/RES/45/1 (2020) // https://documents-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G20/235/35/PDF/G2023535.pdf?OpenElement
  46. UN. High Commissioner for human rights. Report “On the situation of human rights in Belarus in the context of the 2020 presidential election.” No. A/HRC/46/4 (2020) // https://documents-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G21/032/81/PDF/G2103281.pdf?OpenElement
  47. UN. Human Rights Committee. Aide Memoire “Denunciation of the PIDCP by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.” No.C.N.467.1997.TREATIES-10 (1997) // https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/1997/CN.467.1997-Eng.pdf
  48. UN. The Sub Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Re solution “Continuing of obligations under international human rights treaties.” No. E/CN.4/SUB.2/RES/1999/5 (1999) // https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/alldocs.aspx?doc_id=8161
  49. UN. Human Rights Committee. CCPR General Comment No. 24: Issues Relating to Reservations Made upon Ratification or Accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols thereto, or in Relation to Declarations under Article 41 of the Covenant. No. HRI/GEN/1/ Rev.3 (1997) // https://www.refworld.org/docid/453883fc11.html
  50. UN. Human Rights Committee, Katsora v Belarus. Communication No. 1377/2005, 2010, No. Doc. CCPR/C/99/D/1377/2005 // http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/1377-2005.html
  51. UN. Human Rights Committee. Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Belarus. No. CCPR/C/BLR/CO/5 (2018) // https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1649136?ln=en
  52. UN. Human Rights Council Resolution. Report “On human rights situation in Belarus.” No. A/HRC/RES/20/13 (2012) // https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G12/153/60/PDF/G1215360.pdf?OpenElement
  53. UN. Human Rights Committee. Rules of procedure of the HR Committee amended at the 126th session. No. CCPR/C/3/Rev (2021) // https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2FC%2F3%-2FRev.12&Lang=en
  54. UN. Human Rights Committee. CCPR General Comment No. 26: “Continuity of Obligations.” No. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.8/Rev.1 (1997) // http://www.refworld.org/docid/453883fde.html
  55. UN. Human Rights Committee, General Comment 31 (2004). Nature of the General Legal Obligation on States Parties to the Covenant. No. 31(80) (2004) // https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/533996?ln=en
  56. Vashkevich, Aleksandr. The First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Scientific-practical comment. Minsk: Positive Center, 2016.
Language: English
Page range: 70 - 92
Submitted on: Sep 30, 2023
|
Accepted on: Feb 19, 2024
|
Published on: Jun 26, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Liudmila Ulyashyna, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.