References
- “Code de procédure pénale.“ Légifrance (1959) // https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000006071154/
- Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols No. 11 and 14, 4 November 1950, ETS 5.
- Council of Europe, Second Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, 8 November 2001. ETS 82.
- “Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodeksas.“ Valstybės žinios, (1961): 18–148.
- “Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodeksas.“ Valstybės žinios (2000): 37–1341.
- “Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch.“ Die Publikationsplattform des Bundesrechts (1937) // https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/54/757_781_799/de
- Agbabiaka (evidence from abroad: Nare guidance) [2021] UKUT 286 (IAC).
- ECtHR. Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. The United Kingdom. ECtHR Judgement (15 December 2011), App. No. 26766, 22228.
- ECtHR. Arps v. Croatia. ECtHR Judgement (25 October 2016), App. No. 23444.
- ECtHR. Gorbunov and Gorbachev v. Russia. ECtHR Judgement (1 March 2016), App. No. 43183, 27412.
- ECtHR. Marcello Viola v. Italy. ECtHR Judgement (5 October 2006), App. No. 45106.
- ECtHR. Murtazaliyeva v. Russia. ECtHR Judgement (18 December 2018), App. No. 36658.
- ECtHR. Sakhnovskiy v. Russia. ECtHR Judgement (2 November 2010), App. No. 21272.
- ECtHR. Schatschaschwili v. Germany. ECtHR Judgement (15 December 2015), App. No. 9154.
- ECtHR. Stanford v. the United Kingdom. ECtHR Judgement (23 February 1994), App. No. 16757.
- ECtHR. S. v. Switzerland. ECtHR Judgement (28 November 1991), App No. 13965.
- ECtHR. Tarău v. Romania. ECtHR Judgement (24 February 2009), App. No. 3584.
- ECtHR. Thomas v. The United Kingdom. ECtHR Judgement (10 May 2005), App. No. 1935.
- ECtHR. Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands. ECtHR Judgement (23 April 1997), App. No. 21363, 21364, 21427.
- ECtHR. W. S. v. Poland. ECtHR Judgement (19 June 2007), App. No. 21508.
- ECtHR. Zagaria v. Italy. ECtHR Judgement (27 November 2007), App. No. 58295.
- Harrell v. State. 709 So.2d 1364, 1368–69 (Fla. 1998).
- Joyce v Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd [2011] FCAFC 95; (2011) 195 FCR 213.
- Ruling of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania of 6 December 2019 in Criminal Case No 1A-110-318/2019.
- Ruling of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania of 31 October 2017 in Criminal Case No 1A-437-518/2017.
- Ruling of the Supreme Court of Lithuania of 21 November 2019 in Criminal Case No 2K-266-719/2019.
- Ruling of the Supreme Court of Lithuania of 6 January 2021 in Criminal Case No 2K-7-73-511/2021.
- Anne Bowen Poulin. “Criminal Justice and Videoconferencing Technology: the Remote Defendant.“ Tulane Law Review 78(4) (2004).
- Camille Gourdet, Amanda R. Witwer, Lynn Langton, Duren Banks, Michael G. Planty, Dulani Woods, Brian A. Jackson. “Court Appearances in Criminal Proceedings Through Telepresence: Identifying Research and Practice Needs to Preserve Fairness While Leveraging New Technology.“ RAND Corporation (2020) // https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3222.html.
- Citizens’ Economy Efficiency Commission. Video Arraignment 2.0: Streaming Justice. 2019.
- Evert-Jan van der Vlis. “Videoconferencing in Criminal Proceedings.” Ministry of Security and Justice (2011) // www.videoconference-interpreting.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/02_vanderVlis.pdf
- Fair Trials. “Justice under lockdown in Europe: a survey on the impact of COVID-19 on defence rights in Europe.” Fair Trials (25 November 2020) // https://www.fairtrials.org/app/uploads/2021/11/justice-under-lockdown.pdf
- Giulia Angiolini, “Remote Participation in Criminal Proceedings: Does the Reformed Italian Regulation Represent an Application Extension Able to Conflict with the Right to a Fair Trial?” European Criminal Law Review 9(2) (2019).
- “Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.” Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights (last updated 31 August 2022) // https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_6_criminal_eng.pdf
- Jenia Iontcheva Turner. “Remote Criminal Justice.” Texas Tech Law Review 53 (2021).
- Laura Hoyano. “Postage Stamp Justice? Virtual Trials in the Crown Courts under the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.” Criminal Law Review 12 (2021).
- Lisa Bailey Vavonese, Elizabeth Ling, Rosalie Joy, Samantha Kobor. “How Video Changes the Conversation: Social Science Research on Communication Over Video and Implications for the Criminal Courtroom.” Center for Court Innovation (2020) // https://www.innovatingjustice.org/publications/video-changes-conversation-social-science-research-communication
- Matthew Terry, Dr. Steve Johnson, Peter Thompson. “Virtual Court pilot: Outcome evaluation.” Ministry of Justice (2010) // https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/moj-research/virtual-courts.pdf
- Michael D. Roth. “Videoconferencing: Remote Witness Testimony and Adversarial Truth.” UCLA Law Review 48(1) (2000).
- Mike L. Bridenback. “Study of State Trial Courts Use of Remote Technology.” National Association for Presiding Judges and Court Executive Officers (2016) // https://napco4courtleaders.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Remote-Technology-Report-April-2016.pdf
- Penelope Gibs. “Defendants on video – conveyor belt justice or a revolution in access?“ Transform Justice (October 2017) // https://www.transformjustice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Disconnected-Thumbnail-2.pdf
- Perry Herzfeld. “Video link evidence and foreign government consent.” Summer 2011–2012, Bar News (2012).
- Serena Quattrocolo. “Participatory Rights in Comparative Criminal Justice. Similarities and Divergences Within the Framework of the European Law”: 449–509. In: Serena Quattrocolo, Stefano Ruggeri (eds.), Personal Participation in Criminal Proceedings, A Comparative Study of Participatory Safeguards and in absentia Trials in Europe. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2019.
- Taylor Benninger, Courtney Colwell, Debbie Mukamal, Leah Plachinski. “Virtual Justice? A National Study Analyzing the Transition to Remote Criminal Court.“ Stanford Criminal Justice Center (August 2021) // https://law.stanford.edu/publications/virtual-justice-a-national-study-analyzing-the-transition-to-remote-criminal-court/
- Vânia Costa Ramos, Alexis Anagnostakis, Amedeo Barletta, Jaanus Tehver, Nicola Canestrini. “European Criminal Bar Association statement of principles on the use of video-conferencing in criminal cases in a Post-Covid-19 World.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 12(3) (2021).
- Australian Government Attorney-General Department. “Taking evidence in Australia for Foreign Court Proceedings.” aga.gov.au (23 October 2020) // https://www.ag.gov.au/international-relations/publications/taking-evidence-australia-foreign-court-proceedings
- “Explanatory Report on the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union.” Official Journal of the European Communities (30 November 2000): C 37/9/7.
- Lietuvos Respublikos prokuratūra. “Lietuvos Respublikos prokuratūros veiklos 2021 metais ataskaita.” Lietuvos Respublikos prokuratūra (2022) // https://www.prokuraturos.lt/data/public/uploads/2022/03/2021-m.-ataskaita-2022-03-01-nr.-17.9.-222803.21.pdf
- Lietuvos teismai. “Lietuvos teismai: veiklos rezultatai.” Lietuvos teismai (2022) // https://www.teismai.lt/data/public/uploads/2022/03/teismai2022.pdf
- Mindaugas Povilanskas. “Nuotolinis teisiamasis posėdis: pažanga ar „procesinis chuliganizmas“.” Teisė.pro (05 January 2021) // https://www.teise.pro/index.php/2021/01/05/m-povilanskas-nuotolinis-teisiamasis-posedis-pazanga-arprocesinis-chuliganizmas/
- Remigijus Merkevičius. “Suėmimo skyrimas Lietuvoje COVID-19 sąlygomis. Ar tikrai galime sau leisti baksnoti į A. Navalno „teismo procesą“ Rusijoje?“ Teise. pro (01 February 2021) // https://www.teise.pro/index.php/2021/02/01/rmerkevicius-suemimo-skyrimas-lietuvoje-covid-19-salygomis-ar-tikrai-galimesau-leisti-baksnoti-i-a-navalno-teismo-procesa-rusijoje/
- Remigijus Merkevičius. “Lietuvos baudžiamojo proceso diagnozė: COVID-19 pasitikome turėdami prastą savijautą, minorines emocijas ir nuslopintą imunitetą, o kokie išliksime po jo?“ Teise.pro (25 November 2020) // https://www.teise.pro/index.php/2020/11/25/r-merkevicius-lietuvos-baudziamojo-proceso-diagnoze-covid-19-pasitikome-turedami-prasta-savijauta-minorines-emocijas-ir-nuslopinta-imuniteta-o-kokie-isliksime-po-jo/
- The Research Council of Lithuania. “Podoktorantūros stažuočių 2022 m. kvietimo finansuojamų projektų sąrašas (po apeliacijų išnagrinėjimo).” The Research Council of Lithuania (2022) // https://www.lmt.lt/lt/doclib/ywhyzdzf0kwuszue-83dztp6c27qc4bap