References
- Armada, Ines. “The European investigation order and the lack of European standards for gathering standards.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 6, 1 (2015): 8–31.
- Bachmaier Winter, Lorena. “Cross-Border Investigations Under the EPPO Proceedings and the Quest for Balance”: 117–139. In: Lorena Bachmaier Winter (ed.), The European Public Prosecutor’s Office. The Challenges Ahead. Springer, 2018.
- Bikelis, Skirmantas. “Pakartotinis įtartinos turto kilmės vertinimas – pateisinama viešojo intereso apsaugos priemonė ar žmogaus teisių pažeidimas?” (Re-evaluation of the suspicious origin of assets – a justified measure to protect the public interest or a violation of human rights?). Kriminologijos studijos 8 (2020): 38–56.
- ______. “Modeling the patterns of civil confiscation: balancing effectiveness, proportionality and the right to be presumed innocent.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics (2021): 27–28.
- Bose, Martin. Study. An assessment of the Commission’s proposals on electronic evidence. (September 2018) // https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/604989/IPOL_STU(2018)604989_EN.pdf
- Boucht, Johan. “Civil Asset Forfeiture and the Presumption of Innocence under Art. 6(2) ECHR”: 245. In: Jon Petter Rui and Ulrich Sieber (eds.), Non-conviction-based confiscation in Europe. Non-Conviction-Based Confiscation in Europe. Duncker & Humblot, 2015.
- “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 20 November 2008 – Proceeds of organised crime: ensuring that “crime does not pay”.” COM (2008): 766 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/crime-does-not-pay.html
- “Commission of the European Communities Green paper on obtaining evidence in criminal matters from one Member State to another and securing its admissibility, Brussels, 11 November 2009.” COM (2009): 624 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A52009DC0624
- Commission staff working document “impact assessment Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters and Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering evidence in criminal proceedings // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=SWD%3A2018%3A118%3AFIN
- Council of Europe. The Use of Non-Conviction Based Seizure and Confiscation. (2020): 21 // https://rm.coe.int/the-use-of-non-conviction-based-seizure-and-confiscation-2020/1680a0b9d3
- European e-justice portal. Section “Country-specific information and electronic forms related to Regulation 2020/1783” // https://e-justice.europa.eu/38581/LT/taking_evidence_recast
- Evaluation report on the tenth round of mutual evaluations. On the implementation of the European investigation order (EIO) Report of Lithuania // https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16308-2023-REV-1/en/pdf
- EUROPOL. Europol, Does crime still pay? Criminal Asset Recovery in the EU – Survey of statistical information 2010–2014. (2016) // https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/criminal_asset_recovery_in_the_eu_web_version.pdf
- Garcimartin Montero, Regina. “The European Investigation Order and the Respect for Fundamental Rights in Criminal Investigations.” Eucrim 1 (2017): 45–50.
- Magno, Teresa. “The Challenging Path Towards the Establishment of the EU Legal Framework Regulating Cross-Border Access to Digital Evidence”: 23–33. In: Maria Angela Biasiotti, Fabrizio Turchi (eds.), European Investigation Order. Springer, 2023.
- Martinaitytė, Laura. Civil asset confiscation law – new criminal policy or restrictions out bounding criminal procedure? Vilnius University, 2021, 76.
- Miettinen, Samuli. Criminal law and policy in the European Union. Routledge, 2013.
- Mitsilegas, Valsamis et al. Research handbook on EU criminal law. Cheltenham, 2016.
- Ryder, Nicholas. Financial Crime in the 21st century. Cheltenham, 2011.
- Klimek, Libor. “Free Movement of Evidence in Criminal Matters in the EU.” The Lawyer Quarterly 4 (2012): 250–290 // https://tlq.ilaw.cas.cz/index.php/tlq/article/download/49/40
- Kusak Martyna. “Common EU Minimum Standards for Enhancing Mutual Admissibility of Evidence Gathered in Criminal Matters.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research (2017): 337–352.
- ______. “Mutual admissibility of evidence and the European investigation order: aspirations lost in reality.” ERA forum (2019): 391–400.
- Naylo, Tom R. “Wash-out: A critique of follow-the-money methods in crime control policy.” Crime, L & Soc’l Change 1 (1999).
- Report of the activities of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Lithuania in 2021 (2022, No. 17.9.-2228) // https://prokuraturos.lt/data/public/uploads/2022/03/2021-m.-ataskaita-2022-03-01-nr.-17.9.-222803.21.pdf
- Report of the activities of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Lithuania in 2022 (2023, No. 17.9.-1974) // https://prokuraturos.lt/data/public/uploads/2023/03/2022-m.-ataskaita-2023-03-01-nr.-17.9.-1974.pdf
- Report of the activities of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Lithuania in 2023 (2024, No. 17.9.-2177) // https://prokuraturos.lt/data/public/uploads/2024/03/2023-m.-ataskaita-galutine.pdf
- “Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council “Asset recovery and confiscation: Ensuring that crime does not pay”.” COM (2020): 217 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:5776f170-a4b5-11ea-bb7a-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
- “Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Asset recovery and confiscation: Ensuring that crime does not pay.” COM (2020): 217 final // https://eulex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:5776f170-a4b5-11ea-bb7a01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
- Rojszczak, Marcin. “e–Evidence cooperation in criminal matters from an EU perspective.” Modern Law Review 85, 4 (2022): 997–1028.
- Ruggeri, Stefano. “Introduction to the Proposal of a European Investigation order: Due Process Concerns and Open Issues”: 3–25. In: Stefano Ruggeri (ed.), Trans-national Evidence and Multicultural Inquiries in Europe. Springer, 2014.
- Rusu, Ion. “European investigation order in criminal matters in the European Union. General considerations. Some critical opinions.” Tribuna Juridică 6.11 (2016): 56–70.
- Savona, Ernesto U., Riccardi, Michele. Transcrime, From illegal markets to legitimate businesses: the portfolio of organised crime in Europe. (August 2015) // http://www.transcrime.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/OCP-Full-Report.pdf
- Sellier, Elonie, Weyembergh, Anne. Criminal procedural laws across the European Union – A comparative analysis of selected main differences and the impact they have over the development of EU legislation // https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/604977/IPOL_STU(2018)604977_EN.pdf
- Siracusano, Fabrizio. “The European Investigation Order for evidence gathering abroad”: 85–101. In: Tommaso Rafaraci and Rosanna Belfiore (eds.), EU Criminal Justice. Fundamental rights, Transnational proceedings and the European public prosecutor’s office. Springer, 2019.
- Šalčius, Marijus. Neteisėtais baudžiamojo proceso veiksmais padarytos žalos atlyginimo problematika: mokslo daktaro disertacija [Problems of compensation of damages inflicted by unlawful actions in the course of the criminal proceedings: doctoral dissertation]. Vytautas Magnus University, 2021.
- The Stockholm programme – an open and secure Europe serving and protecting citizens // https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/52166/celex_52010xg0504-01-_en_txt.pdf Tosza, Stanislaw. “All evidence is equal, but electronic evidence is more equal than any other: The relationship between the European investigation order and the European Production order.” NJECL Vol. 11(2) (2020): 161–183.
- Tomescu, Ina Raluca. “General Considerations regarding the European Public Prosecutor’s Office.” Annals of the Constantin Brancusi University of Targu Jiu-Letters & Social Sciences Series (2023): 7–13.
- Turchi, Fabrizio. “Evidence Exchange Under the EIO: Technological Challenges”: 35-68. In: Maria Angela Biasiotti, Fabrizio Turchi (eds.), European Investigation Order. Springer, 2023.
- Air Canada v United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights, 1995, application No. 18465/91.
- Butler v UK. European Court of Human Rights, 2002, application No. 41661/98.
- Description of the procedure for conducting and organizing an asset investigation during civil asset confiscation. Approved by the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Lithuania 2020 June 26 order No. I-173. Register of Legal Acts. 2020, No. 2020-14215.
- Case C-324/17, 11 April 2019.
- Case C-584/19, 8 December 2020.
- Case C-852/19, 11 November 2021.
- Case C-724/19, 16 December 2021.
- Case C-16/22, 2 March 2023.
- Case C-255/23, 6 June 2024.
- Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, No. 36-1340.
- Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters // https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=137
- Council framework decision 2008/978/JHA on the European evidence warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matter // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX-%3A32008F0978
- Council framework decision 2003/577/JHA on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32003F0577
- Directive 2014/41/EU on the European Investigation Order in criminal matters // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32014L0041
- Directive (EU) 2023/1544 laying down harmonised rules on the designation of designated establishments and the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering electronic evidence in criminal proceedings // https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32023L1544
- Directive 2017/1371 on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32017L1371
- Explanation of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania of 2024-05-14 No. (1.13 E) 7R-1626.
- G. K. and others (Parquet européen). Court of Justice Judgment of 21 December 2023, C-281/22.
- Law on the Civil Asset Confiscation of the Republic of Lithuania. Register of Legal Acts. 2020, No. 2020-06992.
- Law on Implementation of the European Union and International Law on Civil Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2008, No. 137-5366.
- Law on the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1994, No. 81-1514.
- M v Italy. European Court of Human Rights, 1991, application No. 12386/86.
- Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32012R1215
- Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2020 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (taking of evidence) (recast) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32020R1783
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and for the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32023R1543
- Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/1939/oj
- The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012E%2FTXT
- The Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1992, No. 33-1014.