Lithuania’s Binary Worker Classification Vs. A Teleological Interpretation of the EU’s ‘Worker’ Concept by Germany and the UK
By: Hans Lauschke
References
- Davulis, Tomas. “Darbo Teisės Rekodifikavimas Lietuvoje 2016–2017 m” (Recodification of Lithuanian Labour Law 2016–2017). Teisė, Vol. 104 (2017): 7–27 // DOI: 10.15388/Teise.2017.104.10842
- Davulis, Tomas. Lietuvos Respublikos darbo kodekso komentaras (Commentary on the Labour Code of the Republic of Lithuania). Vilnius: VĮ Registrų centras, 2018.
- Valančius, Virgilijus, et al. Lietuvos Respublikos civilinio kodekso komentaras. Šeštoji knyga. Prievolių teisė. Pirmas tomas (Commentary to the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Sixth Book. Law of Obligations. Volume One). Vilnius: UAB “Justitia”, 2003.
- Martišienė, Beata. “Priklausomą ir savarankišką darbą atskiriančių požymių pokyčiai” (Changes in the characteristics distinguishing dependent and autonomous work). Teisė, Vol. 80 (2011): 138–145 // DOI: 10.15388/Teise.2011.0.156
- Thüsing, Gregor, and Hütter-Brungs, Gisela. “Crowdworking: Lenkung statt Weisung – Was macht den Arbeitnehmer zum Arbeitnehmer?” (Crowdworking: Guidance instead of instructions – What makes an employee an employee?). Rechtsprechungs-Report Arbeitsrecht (2021): 231–237.
- Bagdanskis, Tomas, Mačiulaitis, Vilius, and Mikalopas, Mantas. Lietuvos Respublikos darbo kodekso komentaras: individualieji darbo santykiai (Commentary on the Labour Code of the Republic of Lithuania: individual employment relations). Vilnius: UAB “Rito projects”, 2018.
- Wank, Rolf. “Die personellen Grenzen des Europäischen Arbeitsrechts: Arbeitsrecht für Nicht-Arbeitnehmer?” (The personal limits of European employment law: Employment law for non-employees). Europäische Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (2008): 172–195.
- Wank, Rolf. “Die Entwicklung der Rechtsprechung des EuGH zum Arbeitnehmerbegriff” (The development of CJEU case law on the concept of worker). Europäische Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (2023): 22–49.
- Junker, Abbo. “Die Einflüsse des europäischen Rechts auf die personelle Reichweite des Arbeitnehmerschutzes – Der Arbeitnehmerbegriff in der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs” (The influence of European law on the personal scope of worker protection – The concept of worker in the case law of the European Court of Justice). Europäische Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (2016): 184–205.
- Preis, Ulrich. “BGB § 611a Arbeitsvertrag” (Civil Code § 611a Employment contract). In: Rudi Müller-Glöge, Ingrid Schmidt, Ulrich Preis, and Thomas Dieterich, eds., Erfurter Kommentar zum Arbeitsrecht. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2024.
- Risak, Martin, and Dullinger, Thomas. The Concept of ‘Worker’ in EU Law: Status Quo and Potential for Change. Brussels: ETUI aisbl, 2018.
- Wank, Rolf. “Der Arbeitnehmerbegriff in der Europäischen Union – Praktische Konsequenzen” (The concept of worker in the European Union – Practical consequences). Europäische Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (2018): 327–345.
- Kullmann, Miriam. “‘Platformisation’ of work: An EU perspective on Introducing a legal presumption.” European Labour Law Journal Vol. 13, Issue 1 (2022): 66–80 // DOI: 10.1177/20319525211063112
- Schulze-Doll, Christine. “ArbSchG § 2 Begriffsbestimmungen” (Occupational Health and Safety Act § 2 Definitions). In: Wolfhard Kohte, Ulrich Faber, and Dörte Busch, eds., Gesamtes Arbeitsschutzrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2023.
- Pottschmidt, Daniela. Arbeitnehmerähnliche Personen in Europa (Employee-like persons in Europe). Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2006.
- Hohmeister, Frank. “BUrlG § 2 Geltungsbereich” (Federal Paid Leave Act § 2 Scope of application). In: Frank Hohmeister, and Angelika Oppermann, eds., Bundesurlaubsgesetz. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2013.
- Willemsen, Heinz Josef, and Müntefering, Michael. “Begriff und Rechtsstellung arbeitnehmerähnlicher Personen: Versuch einer Präzisierung” (Concept and legal status of employee-like persons: Attempt at clarification). Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (2008): 193–201.
- Kohte, Wolfhard. “ArbSchG § 2 Begriffsbestimmungen” (Occupational Health and Safety Act § 2 Definitions). In: Norbert Kollmer, Thomas Klindt and Carsten Schucht, eds., Arbeitsschutzgesetz: ArbSchG. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2021.
- Freedland, Mark, and Prassl, Jeremias. “Employees, workers and the ‘sharing economy’ Changing practices and changing concepts in The United Kingdom.” Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal Vol. 6(1–2) (2017): 16–29 // DOI: 10.20318/sllerj.2017.3922
- ILO. The Employment Relationship: An annotated guide to ILO Recommendation 198. Geneva: ILO, 2007.
- Abrantes, José João, Ales, Edoardo, Aune, Helga, et al. Thematic Report 2009: Characteristics of the Employment Relationship. Brussels: ELLN34, 2010.
- European Commission. “GREEN PAPER Modernising labour law to meet the challenges of the 21st century”. COM(2006) 708 final. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/com/com_com(2006)0708_/com_com(2006)0708_en.pdf (accessed 1 April 2024).
- Wank, Rolf. Workers’ Protection National Study for Germany for the ILO // https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@dialogue/documents/genericdocument/wcms_205364.pdf (accessed 1 April 2024).
- Menegatti, Emanuele. „The Evolving Concept of ‘worker’ in EU law.” Italian Labour Law e-Journal, Issue 1, Vol. 12 (2019): 71–83 // DOI: 10.6092/issn.1561-8048/9699
- Republic of Lithuania Law on the Approval, Entry into Force and Implementation of the Labour Code. Register of Legal Acts, 2016, no. 23709.
- J.S. v UAB “Romerta”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2001, no. 3K-3-123.
- Z.V. v S.P. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2002, no. 3K-3-264.
- Law on Approval, Entry into Force and Implementation of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Civil Code. Official Gazette, 2000, no. 74-2262.
- K.M., K.S., M.T.H. and T.N. v UAB “Kevin EU” and UAB “Open Banking LT”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2022, no. e3K-3-151-684/2022.
- R.J. v UAB “Autobestas”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2018, no. 3K-3-68-248/2018.
- R.A. v AB “ORLEN Lietuva”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2018, no. e3K-3-114-701/2018.
- Law on Employment of the Republic of Lithuania. Register of Legal Acts, 2016, no. 18825.
- Law on Personal Income Tax of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no. 73-3085.
- G. L. v UAB „TV žaidimai“. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2023, no. e3K-3-109-684/2023.
- Saerimner v State Tax Inspectorate under the Finance of the Republic of Lithuania. Supreme Administrative Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2012, no. A-602-164-12.
- Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union. COM(2017) 797 final.
- CJEU. Case C-75/63, Unger (Hoekstra), 1964, EU:C:1964:19.
- CJEU. Case C-53/81, Levin, 1982, EU:C:1982:105.
- CJEU. Case C-337/97, Meeusen, 1999, EU:C:1999:284.
- CJEU. Case C-176/96, Lehtonen, 2000, EU:C:2000:201.
- CJEU. Case C-216/15, Ruhrlandklinik, 2016, EU:C:2016:883.
- Directive (EU) 2019/1152 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union. Official Journal L 186, 11.7.2019, p. 105–121.
- CJEU. Case C-229/14, Balkaya, 2015, EU:C:2015:455.
- CJEU. Case C-66/85, Lawrie-Blum, 1986, EU:C:1986:284.
- CJEU. Case C-413/13, FNV Kunsten, 2014, EU:C:2014:2411.
- CJEU. Case C-256/01, Allonby, 2004, EU:C:2004:18.
- CJEU. Case C-232/09, Danosa, 2010, EU:C:2010:674.
- CJEU. Case C-3/87, Agegate, 1989, EU:C:1989:650.
- CJEU. Case C22/98, Becu, 1999, EU:C:1999:419.
- CJEU. Case C-432/14, O, 2015, EU:C:2015:643.
- CJEU. Case C-422/14, Pujante Rivera, 2015, EU:C:2015:743.
- CJEU. Case C-14/09, Genc, 2010, EU:C:2010:57.
- CJEU. Case C-228/07, Petersen, 2008, EU:C:2008:494.
- CJEU. Case C-138/02, Collins, 2004, EU:C:2004:172.
- CJEU. Case C-456/02, Trojani, 2004, EU:C:2004:488.
- CJEU. Case C-337/10, Neidel, 2012, EU:C:2012:263.
- CJEU. Case C316/13, Fenoll, 2015, EU:C:2015:200.
- CJEU. Case C-518/15, Matzak, 2018, EU:C:2018:82.
- CJEU. Case C428/09, Union syndicale Solidaires Isère, 2010, EU:C:2010:612.
- CJEU. Case C47/14, Holterman Ferho Exploitatie, 2015, EU:C:2015:574.
- CJEU. Case C147/17, Sindicatul Familia Constanța, 2018, EU:C:2018:926.
- CJEU. Case C-519/09, May, 2011, EU:C:2011:221.
- CJEU. Case C-85/96, Martínez Sala, 1998, EU:C:1998:217
- CJEU. Case C-543/03, Dodl and Oberhollenzer, 2005, EU:C:2005:364.
- Opinion of AG Kokott. In CJEU-Case C-393/10, O’Brien, 2011, EU:C:2011:746.
- Opinion of AG Mengozzi. In CJEU-Case C-316/13, Fenoll; 2014, EU:C:2014:1753.
- Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation. Official Journal L, 204, 26.07.2006, p. 23–36.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 25.06.2020 – 8 AZR 145/19. Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (2020): 1613–1626.
- Law of the Republic of Lithuania on Occupational Safety and Health. Official Gazette, 2003, no. 70-3170.
- Law on State Social Insurance of the Republic of Lithuania. Lietuvos aidas, 1991, no. 107-0.
- Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal 115, 09.05.2008, p. 0114–0116.
- Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work. Official Journal L, 183, 29.6.1989, p. 1.
- CJEU. Case 80-76, North Kerry Milk Products, 1977, EU:C:1977:39.
- Occupational Health and Safety Act [ArbSchG] of 7 August 1996. Federal Law Gazette I p. 1246. As amended by Article 2 of the Act of 31 May 2023, Federal Law Gazette, 2023 I no. 140.
- Civil Code [BGB] in the version promulgated on 2 January 2002. Federal Law Gazette I p. 42, 2909; 2003 I p. 738. Last amended by Article 17 of the Act of 6 May 2024, Federal Law Gazette, 2024 I no. 149.
- Draft law amending the Temporary Employment Act and other laws – Explanatory memorandum. Bundestagsdrucksache (German Parliament Document) 18/9232.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 17.05.1978 – 5 AZR 580/77. AP BGB § 611 Abhängigkeit Nr. 28.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 09.09.1981 – 5 AZR 477/79. AP BGB § 611 Abhängigkeit Nr. 38.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 01.12.2020 – 9 AZR 102/20. Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (2021): 552-562.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 13.08.1980 – 4 AZR 592/78. AP BGB § 611 Abhängigkeit Nr. 37.
- Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time. Official Journal L, 299, 18.11.2003, p. 9–19.
- Collective Bargaining Act [TVG] in the version published on 25 August 1969. Fe deral Law Gazette. I p. 1323. Last amended by Article 8 of the Act of 20 May 2020, Federal Law Gazette. I p. 1055.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 21. 2. 2007 – 5 AZB 52/06. Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (2007): 699–700.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 17.01.2006 – 9 AZR 61/05. Neue Juristische Online Zeitschrift (2006): 3821–3824.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 15.11.2005 – 9 AZR 626/04. Neue Juristische Online Zeitschrift (2007): 5250–5257.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 26.09.2002 – 5 AZB 19/01. Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (2002): 1412–1415.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 28.06.1973 – 5 AZR 568/72. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (1973): 1994–1995.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 08.06.1967 – 5 AZR 461/66, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (1967): 1982–1983.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 17.06.1999 – 5 AZB 23/98, Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (1999): 1175–1176.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 23.12.1961 – 5 AZR 53/61. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (1962): 1125–1126.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 04.11.1998 – VIII ZB 12/98. Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (1999): 53–56.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 23.02.1977 – VIII ZR 222/75. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (1977): 853–854.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 02.10.1990 – 4 AZR 106/90. Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (1991): 239–241.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 21.01.2019 – 9 AZB 23/18. Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (2019): 490–495.
- Federal Labour Court (BAG). 21.5.2019 – 9 AZR 295/18. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (2019): 1411–1415.
- Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Nor thern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community 2019/C 384 I/01. Official Journal C, 384I, 12.11.2019, p. 1–177.
- The Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain v The Secretary of the State for Work and Pensions and the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy [2020] EWHC 3050.
- Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, c. 37. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/37/
- Employment Rights Act, 1996, c. 18. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/
- Byrne Bros (Formwork) Ltd v Baird [2002] ICR 667.
- Pimlico Plumbers Ltd v Smith [2018] UKSC 29.
- Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5.
- Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP [2014] UKSC 32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2024-00019 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Language: English
Page range: 142 - 167
Submitted on: Jun 6, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 7, 2024
Published on: Jan 22, 2025
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 Hans Lauschke, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.