Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pandemics in Cyberspace – Empire in Search of a Sovereign? Cover

Pandemics in Cyberspace – Empire in Search of a Sovereign?

Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. 1. Andraško, Jozef, Matúš Mesarčík, and Ondrej Hamuľák. “The regulatory intersections between artificial intelligence, data protection and cyber security: challenges and opportunities for the EU legal framework.” AI & Soc Vol. 36 (2021): 623–636 // https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01125-5.10.1007/s00146-020-01125-5
  2. 2. Bandemer, Stephan, et al. “Staatsaufgaben – Von der ‘schleichenden’ Privatisierung zum ‘aktivierenden Staat’” (The role of states – from ‘creeping’ privatisation to the ‘activating state’): 41–60. In: Fritz Behrens, ed. Den Staat neu denken. Reformperspektiven für die Landesverwaltung (Rethinking the state. Reform perspectives for the state administration). Berlin: Sigma, 1995.
  3. 3. Barlow, John Perry. “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace” (May 2021) // https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence.10.21428/6ffd8432.ea8cd895
  4. 4. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.
  5. 5. Davila, Erica M. “International E-Discovery: Navigating the Maze” (May 2021) // https://tlp.law.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/tlp/article/view/37.
  6. 6. De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. “Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law.” Journal of Law and Society 14(3) (1987): 279–302.10.2307/1410186
  7. 7. Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.
  8. 8. Hamuľák, Ondrej. “Lessons from the ‘Constitutional Mythology’ or How to Reconcile the Concept of State Sovereignty with European Integration.” DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review Vol. 6, No. 2 (2015): 75–90 // https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2015-0005.10.1515/danb-2015-0005
  9. 9. Hamuľák, Ondrej, Lilla N. Kiss, Tomáš Gábriš, and Hovsep Kocharyan. “This Content is not Available in your Country. A General Summary on Geo-Blocking in and Outside the European Union.” International and Comparative Law Review Vol. 21, No. 1 (2021): 153–183 // https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0006.10.2478/iclr-2021-0006
  10. 10. Hart, Herbert L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.
  11. 11. Ipsen, Nils Ch. Private Normenordnungen als Transnationales Recht? (Private Norm Systems as Transnational Law?). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2009.10.3790/978-3-428-12977-5
  12. 12. Kabat-Rudnicka, Danuta. “Autonomy or Sovereignty: The Case of the European Union.” International and Comparative Law Review Vol. 20, No. 2 (2020): 73–92 // https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-0018.10.2478/iclr-2020-0018
  13. 13. Kadelbach, Stefan, and Klaus Günther. “Recht ohne Staat?” (Law without State): 9–48. In: Stefan Kadelbach and Klaus Günther, eds. Recht ohne Staat? Zur Normativität nichtstaatlicher Rechtssetzung (Law without State? On the Normativity of Non-State Law-making). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2011.
  14. 14. Kagermann, Henning, and Ulrich Wilhelm, eds. “European Public Sphere: Towards Digital Sovereignty for Europe.” The acatech IMPULSE series (May 2020) // https://www.acatech.de/publikation/european-public-sphere/download-pdf?lang=en.
  15. 15. Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198252177.001.0001
  16. 16. Lee, Myungsuk. “Conceptualizing the New Governance: A New Institution of Social Coordination” (May 2021) // https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/71ec/0b861a6dad2d93b56ab5f8c6b77bfa415a48.pdf.
  17. 17. Leenes, Ronald, Bert Jaa Koops, and Paul De Hert. Constitutional Rights and New Technologies: A Comparative Study. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008.
  18. 18. Lessig, Lawrence. Code V.2. New York: Basic Books, 2006.
  19. 19. Ohm, Paul. “The Argument Against Technology-Neutral Surveillance Laws.” Texas Law Review 88 (2010): 1685–1714.
  20. 20. Polčák, Radim, et al. Právo informačních technologií (IT Law). Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2018.
  21. 21. Polčák, Radim. “In Law, we Trust: Shortly to Bumblebees and the Normativity of Law in Cyberspace”: 3–10. In: Radim Polčák, Martin Škop, and David Šmahel, eds. Cyberspace 2005. Brno: Masayrkova Univerzita, 2006
  22. 22. Rogers, Kevin M. The Internet and the Law. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
  23. 23. Roguski, Przemysław. “Layered Sovereignty: Adjusting Traditional Notions of Sovereignty to a Digital Environment”: 1–13. In: Tomáš Minárik et al., eds. 11th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Silent Battle. Tallinn: NATO CCD COE Publications, 2019 // https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2019/06/Art_19_Layered-Sovereignty.pdf.10.23919/CYCON.2019.8756900
  24. 24. Romano, Santi. Die Rechtsordnung (The Legal Order). Translated by Werner Daum. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1975.
  25. 25. Solomon. Jason M. “New Governance, Preemptive Self-Regulation, and the Blurring of Boundaries in Regulatory Theory and Practice” (May 2021) // https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/680/.
  26. 26. Tropina, Tatiana, and Cormac Callanan. Self- and Co-regulation in Cybercrime, Cybersecurity and National Security. Cham: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-16447-2
  27. 27. Vec, Miloš. “Das selbstgeschaffene Recht der Ingenieure. Internationalisierung und Dezentralisierung am Beginn der Industriegesellschaft” (The self-created right of engineers. Internationalisation and decentralisation at the beginning of industrial society): 96–97. In: European and International Regulation after the Nation State. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2004.
  28. 28. Wright, Aaron, and Primavera De Filippi. “Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia” (May 2021) // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2580664.
  29. 29. Yen, Alfred C. “Western Frontier or Feudal Society? Metaphors and Perceptions of Cyberspace.” Berkeley Law Journal 17 (2002): 1207–1264.10.2139/ssrn.322522
  30. 30. Završnik, Aleš. “Cybercrime: (Cyber)Criminological and (Cyber)Victimological Particularities of the ‘Information Superhighway’”: 157–174. In: Radim Polčák, Martin Škop, and David Šmahel, eds. Cyberspace 2005. Brno: Masayrkova Univerzita, 2006.
  31. 31. Zippelius, Reinhold. Verhaltenssteuerung durch Recht und kulturelle Leitideen. (Behavioural control through law and cultural guiding ideas). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2004.10.3790/978-3-428-51456-4
Language: English
Page range: 103 - 123
Submitted on: Apr 26, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 16, 2021
Published on: Oct 8, 2021
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Tomáš Gábriš, Ondrej Hamuľák, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.