Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of EU Principles in Criminal Law: is the Principle of Direct Effect Applicable? Cover

The Role of EU Principles in Criminal Law: is the Principle of Direct Effect Applicable?

Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. 1. Court of Justice of the European Union. Annual Report of Court of Justice 2017, Judicial Activity. Luxembourg, 2018 // https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-06/ra_2017_lt_web.pdf.
  2. 2. Court of Justice of the European Union. Annual Report of Court of Justice 2018, Judicial Activity. Luxembourg, 2019 // https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2019-06/_ra_2018_lt.pdf.
  3. 3. Court of Justice of the European Union. Annual Report of Court of Justice 2019, Judicial Activity. Luxembourg, 2020 // https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-05/qd-ap-20-001-en-n.pdf.
  4. 4. Gilbert, Eleanor. “Supremacy and Direct Effect: Necessary Measures?” North East Law Review 5 (2017): 11–15.
  5. 5. Herlin-Karnell, Ester. “The Lisbon Treaty and the Area of Criminal Law and Justice. European Policy Analysis.” Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies 3 (2008): 1–10.
  6. 6. Herlin-Karnell, Ester. “The Lisbon Treaty. A Critical Analysis of its Impact on EU Criminal Law.” Eucrim 2 (2010): 59–65.10.2139/ssrn.2167743
  7. 7. Herlin-Karnell, Ester. “What Principles Drive (or Should Drive) European Criminal Law?” German Law Journal 11, no. 10 (2010): 1115–1130.10.1017/S2071832200020137
  8. 8. Karayigit, Mustafa T. “Are Directives Directly Applicable?” Ankara Avrupa Calismalari Dergisi 15, no. 2 (2016): 59–95.10.1501/Avraras_0000000235
  9. 9. Klimek, Libor. European Arrest Warrant. London: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-07338-5
  10. 10. Miettinen, Samuli. Criminal Law and Policy in the European Union. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.
  11. 11. Mitsilegas, Valsamis. EU Criminal Law. Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2009.
  12. 12. Robin-Olivier, Sophie. “The Evolution of Direct Effect in the EU: Stocktaking Problems, Projections.” International Law Journal of Constitutional Law 12, no. 1 (2014): 165–188.10.1093/icon/mou007
  13. 13. Samulytė-Mamontovė, Aistė. “Principle of Legal Certainty and (In)direct Effect of Directives.” Social Transformations in Contemporary Society 2 (2014): 57–68.
  14. 14. Soloveičikas, Deidvidas. “Europos Sąjungos teisės tiesioginis veikimas ir jos taikymas – dvi skirtingos tapačios doktrinos dalys?” (Direct Effect and Application of European Community Law: Two Distinct Parts of the Same Doctrine?). Jurisprudencija 4, no. 94 (2007): 35–43.
  15. 15. Švedas, Gintaras. “Europos Sąjungos teisės įtaka Lietuvos baudžiamajai teisei” (The Influence of EU Law on Lithuanian Criminal Law). Teisė 74 (2010): 7–20.10.15388/Teise.2010.0.262
  16. 16. Vlaicu, Anca-Magda. “The Direct Effect of Treaty Provisions.” Lex et Scientia International Journal 16 (2009): 235–249.
  17. 17. Vukadinovic, Radovan D. “The Concept and Faces of Direct Effect of European Community Law.” Review of European Law 13, no. 1 (2011): 35–48.
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 75
Submitted on: Oct 19, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 29, 2020
Published on: Mar 18, 2021
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Edita Gruodytė, Saulė Milčiuvienė, Neringa Palionienė, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.