Modeling the Patterns of Civil Confiscation: Balancing Effectiveness, Proportionality and the Right to Be Presumed Innocent
References
- 1. Bikelis, Skirmantas. “Chasing Criminal Wealth: Broken Expectations for the Criminalization of Illicit Enrichment in Lithuania.” Journal of Money Laundering Control [accepted for publication on 2020-12-16, pending for EarlyCite] // DOI:10.1108/JMLC-12-2020-0135.
- 2. Bikelis, Skirmantas. “Prosecution for Illicit Enrichment: The Lithuanian Perspective.” Journal of Money Laundering Control 20(2) (2017): 203–214.
- 3. Boucht, Johan. “Asset confiscation in Europe – past, present and future challenges.” Journal of Financial Crime 26(2) (2019): 526–548.
- 4. Boucht, Johan. The Limits of Asset Confiscation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017.
- 5. Chistyakova, Yulia, David S. Wall, and Stefano Bonino. “The Back-Door Governance of Crime: Confiscating Criminal Assets in the UK.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research (2019): 1–21 // https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09423-5.
- 6. Galabov, Antoniy, Chiara Putaturo, Claudia Marà, Diana Kovatcheva, Giorgio Fraschini, Kapka Milcheva, Katia Hristova-Valtcheva, Krum Zarkov, Miruna Maier, Petia Ivanova, Ruxandra Soare, and Savina Mihailova-Goleminova. Legislation meets practice: national and European perspectives in confiscation and forfeiture of assets. Comparative report. Sofia: Transparency International, 2015.
- 7. Jurisconsult at the European Court of Human Rights. “Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Right to a fair trial (criminal limb).” Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, 2019.
- 8. Kennedy, Anthony. “Civil recovery proceedings under Proceeds of Crime Act 200.” Journal of Money Laundering Control 9 (3) (2006): 245–264.
- 9. Lasky, Mathew R. “Imposing Indigence: Reclaiming the Qualified Right to Counsel of Choice in Criminal Asset Forfeiture Cases.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 104(1) (2014): 165–194.
- 10. Mazzacuva, Francesco. “The Problematic Nature of Asset Recovery Measures: Recent Developments of the Italian Preventive Confiscation”: 101–115. In: Katalin Ligeti and Michele Simonato, eds. Chasing Criminal Money. Challenges and Perspectives On Asset Recovery in the EU. Hart Publishing, 2019.
- 11. Panzavolta, Michele. “Confiscation and the Concept of Punishment: Can There be a Confiscation Without a Conviction?”: 25–52. In: Katalin Ligeti and Michele Simonato, eds. Chasing Criminal Money. Challenges and Perspectives on Asset Recovery in the EU. Hart Publishing, 2019.
- 12. Simonato, Michele. “Directive 2014/42/EU and Non-Conviction Based Confiscation: A Step Forward on Asset Recovery?” New Journal of European Criminal Law 6(2) (2015): 213–229 // doi:10.1177/203228441500600205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2020-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Language: English
Page range: 24 - 48
Submitted on: Nov 28, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 29, 2020
Published on: Mar 18, 2021
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
© 2021 Skirmantas Bikelis, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.