The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?

Pasvenskienė, Aušrinė; Astromskis, Paulius

doi:10.2478/bjlp-2020-0008

Abstract

This article explores how emerging technologies should shape legal studies, recognizing that the new technological era requires a new generation of tech-savvy lawyers who possess specific technology-related skills and knowledge. The article builds on analysis of the future of work through the lens of the International Labor Organization Centenary Declaration, followed by an analysis of the right to education, leading to the formation of a theoretical justification of the legal duty to adapt the legal education curriculum to a technology-driven future. This article exposes the existing state of the legal education curriculum with a systematic analysis of the existing Law & Tech master’s programs at leading universities worldwide. This research demonstrates that relatively few (9.8%) leading world universities offer specialized Law & Tech master’s programs. This clear underdevelopment of the Law & Tech curriculum suggests that deeply embedded conservatism in legal education might be violating the rights of future lawyers – the right to work and the right to education, in particular.

References

1. ABA Commission on the Future of Legal Services. “Report on the Future of Legal Services in the United States” (2016) // https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/images/abanews/2016FLSReport_FNL_WEB.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. ABA Task Force on the Future of Legal Education. “Report and Recommendations” (2014) //http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/report_and_recommendations_of_aba_task_force.authcheckdam.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Asimov, Isaac. “Visit to the World’s Fair of 2014.” N.Y. Times (Aug. 16, 1964) // http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/03/23/lifetimes/asi-v-fair.html.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Balliester, Thereza, and Adam Elsheikhi. “The Future of Work: A Literature Review.” ILO Research Department Working Paper No. 29 (2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Baude, William, et al. “Making Doctrinal Work More Rigorous: Lessons from Systematic Reviews.” University of Chicago Law Review 84 (2017): 37–58.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Bras, Rafael L., and Richard A. DeMillo. “The leadership challenges for higher education’s digital future”: 39–56. In: James Soton Antony, Ana Mari Cauce, and Donna E. Shalala, eds. Challenges in Higher Education Leadership. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Canick, Simon. “Infusing Technology Skills into the Law School Curriculum.” Cap. U. L. Rev. 42 (2014): 663–708.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Council of the European Union. “European Council meeting conclusions” (EUCO 14/17, 2017) // https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21620/19-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Delbrück, Jost. “The Right to Education as an International Human Right.” German Yearbook of International Law 35 (1992): 92–104.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Easterbrook, Frank H. “Cyberspace and the Law of the Horse.” U. Chi. Leg. F. 207 (1996).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. “Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI” (2019) // https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. European Commission. “A concept paper on digitisation, employability and inclusiveness. The role of Europe” (2017) // http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/document.cfm?doc_id=44515.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. European Commission. “Reflection Paper on Harnessing Globalization” (COM/2017/240 final) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2017%3A240%3AFIN.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. European Commission. “Reflection Paper on the Social Dimension of Europe” (COM/2017/206 final) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:cea6403b-2b4c-11e7-9412-01aa75ed71a1.0017.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Fomin, Vladislav V. “AI in the Context of Regulation of Smart Technology Services.” ATEITIS workshop presentation at Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania (Sep. 21, 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Gruodytė, Edita, and Julija Kiršienė. “Legal Education in Lithuania: Guidelines for Quality Improvement in Accordance with the Bologna Process.” Inžinerinė ekonomika 22 (2011): 356–366 // DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.22.4.711.10.5755/j01.ee.22.4.711
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. International Labour Conference. “ILO Centenary Declaration for the Future of Work.” 108th Session of the International Labour Conference (Jun. 21, 2019) // https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/mission-and-objectives/centenary-declaration/lang--en/index.htm.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Kerikmäe, Tanel, Thomas Hoffmann, and Archil Chochia. “Legal Technology for Law Firms: Determining Roadmaps for Innovation.” Croat. Int. Rel. Rev. 24 (2018): 91–112 // https://doi.org/10/gfwp5q.10.2478/cirr-2018-0005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Koo, Gene. “New Skills, New Learning: Legal Education and the Promise of Technology.” Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2007-4 (2007) // http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.976646.10.2139/ssrn.976646
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Law Society of England and Wales. “Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession – Horizon Scanning Report” (2018) // https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/research-trends/horizon-scanning/artificial-intelligence/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Law Society of New South Wales. “The Future of Law and Innovation in the Profession” (2017) // https://www.lawsociety.com.au/sites/default/files/2018-03/1272952.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Lee, Jootaek. “The Human Right to Education: Definition, Research and Annotated Bibliography.” Emory International Law Review 34(3) (2019): 1–49 // https://ssrn.com/abstract=3489328.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Lessig, Lawrence. “The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach.” Harv. L. Rev. 113 (1999): 501–546.10.2307/1342331
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Maharg, Paul, and Emma Nicol. “Simulation and Technology in Legal Education: A Systematic Review and Future Research Program.” In: Caroline Strevens, et al., eds. Legal Education. Simulation in Theory and Practice. Ashgate, Farnham, UK, 2014 // https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1911.3129.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Méda, Dominique. “The Future of Work: The Meaning and Value of Work in Europe.” ILO Research Paper No. 18 (2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Microsoft. “Future Computed. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Society” (2018) // https://blogs.microsoft.com/uploads/2018/02/The-Future-Computed_2.8.18.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Moher, David, et al. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement.” Systematic Revs. 4 (2015) // doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Mountain, Darryl R. “Disrupting Conventional Law Firm Business Models Using Document Assembly.” Int. J. L. Info. Tech. 15 (2006): 170–191 // https://doi.org/10/djkxjr.10.1093/ijlit/eal019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Nübler, Irmgard. “New Technologies: A Jobless Future or a Golden Age of Job Creation?” ILO Research Department Working Paper No. 13 (2016).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. OECD. “Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills” (2016) // https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en.10.1787/9789264265097-en
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Piper, Rory J. “How to Write a Systematic Literature Review: A Guide for Medical Students.” National AMR, Fostering Medical Research 1 (2013) // https://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/curesmed/files/2014/10/NSAMR-Systematic-Review.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Ribstein, Larry E. “The Death of Big Law.” Wisc. L. R. 2010, no. 3 (2010): 749–815 // https://doi.org/10/fznz5c.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Schwab, Klaus. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means, How to Respond.” World Economic Forum (Jan. 14, 2016) // https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. “Shaping Digitalisation for an Interconnected World.” G20 Digital Economy Ministerial Declaration (2017) // https://unctad.org/meetings/en/Contribution/dtl_eWeek2017c02-G20_en.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG)” (2015) // https://enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Susskind, Richard, and Daniel Susskind. The Future of the Professions: How Technology will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford University Press, 2015.10.1093/oso/9780198713395.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Susskind, Richard. The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the nature of legal services. Oxford University Press, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Susskind, Richard. Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future. Oxford University Press, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. “Times Higher Education World University Rankings” (2020) // https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2020/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/-1/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/scores.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
40. Tomaševski, Katerina. “Human Rights Obligations: Making Education Available, Accessible, Acceptable and Adaptable.” Right to Education Primers 3 (2001): 1–43 // ttps://www.right-to-education.org/sites/right-to-education.org/files/resource-attachments/Tomasevski_Primer%203.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
41. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). “General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education (Art. 13 of the Covenant), Paragraph 6” (December 1999) // http://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838c22.html.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
42. UNESCO. “The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the SDGs” // https://sdg4education2030.org/the-goal.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
43. Van der Wende, Marijk. “The Emergence of Liberal Arts and Sciences Education in Europe: A Comparative Perspective.” Higher Education Policy 24 (2011): 233–253 // DOI: 10.1057/hep.2011.3.10.1057/hep.2011.3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
44. Veith, Christian, et al. “How Legal Technology Will Change the Business of Law.” Boston Consulting Group and Bucerius Law School (2016) // https://www.law-school.de/article/new-study-how-legal-technology-will-change-the-business-of-law/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
45. Walter, Katie. “Six Ways Law Schools Can Make Students More Practice Ready.” Thomson Reuters (2017) // http://www.legalexecutiveinstitute.com/six-ways-law-schools-students/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
46. Yannascoli, Sarah M., et al. “How to Write a Systematic Review: A Step-by-Step Guide.” U. Penn. Orth. J. 23 (2013).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
1. Communication from the Commission Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. COM/2010/2020 final // https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. COM/2015/192 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52015DC0192.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A Renewed EU Agenda for Higher Education. COM/2017/0247 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52017DC0247.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Digital Education Action Plan. COM/2018/022 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2018:22:FIN.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A New Skills Agenda for Europe. Working Together to Strengthen Human Capital, Employability and Competitiveness. COM/2016/0381 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0381.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Youth on the Move. An Initiative to Unleash the Potential of Young People to Achieve Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in the European Union. COM/2010/477 final // https://europa.eu/youthonthemove/docs/communication/youth-on-the-move_EN.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A Digital Agenda for Europe. COM/2010/245 final // https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Artificial Intelligence for Europe. COM/2018/237 final // https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-artificial-intelligence-europe.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Building Trust in Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence. COM/2019/168 final // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:0168:FIN.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Council of the European Union Recommendation 2018/C 189/01 on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. May 22, 2018 // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&from=EN.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Descriptor of the Study Field of Law, Approved by Order No. V-831 of the Minister of Education and Sciences of the Republic of Lithuania of 23 July 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14. Council of Europe, 4 November 1950.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. UN General Assembly, 1966, resolution no. 2200A (XXI).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Law on Higher Education and Research of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2009, no. 54-2140.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Niemietz v. Germany. 251 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) (1992).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Sidabras and Džiautas v. Lithuania. Eur. Ct. H.R. 395 (2004).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania Ruling on the Compliance of the Qualification Requirements of Higher Education in Law for the Persons Who Wish to Hold, Under Procedure Established by Laws, the Position of a Judge Approved by Government of the Republic of Lithuania Resolution no. 1568 “On Approving the Qualification Requirements of Higher Education in Law for the Persons Who Wish to Hold, Under Procedure Established By Laws, the Position of a Judge” of 4 October 2002 with Paragraph 1 (wording of 24 January 2002, 18 May 2004, 1 June 2006) of Article 51 of the Republic of Lithuania Law on Courts and Paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Republic of Lithuania Law on the Entry Into Force and Implementation of the Law on Amending the Law on Courts. 2008, no.19/05.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. General Assembly. 1948, Resolution No. 217A.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. UNESCO Convention against Discrimination in Education. 1960.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. UNESCO Recommendation on Adult Learning and Education. 2016.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. United States v. Carroll Towing Co. 159 F.2d 169 (2d. Cir. 1947).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?

Abstract

Paradigm

My account