References
- 1. Anđelković, Luka. “The Elements of Proportionality as a Principle of Human Rights Limitations.” Facta Universitatis Series: Law and Politics 15:3 (2017): 235 – 244.
- 2. Barak, Aharon. Proportionality. Constitutional Rights and their Limitations. Harvard: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
- 3. Bendor, Ariel L., and Tal Sela. “How proportional is proportionality?” International Journal of Constitutional Law 13 (2015): 530–544.
- 4. Bernstorff, Jochen von. “Proportionality without Balancing. Comparative Judicial Engagement”: 63-83. In: Liora Lazarus, et al., eds. Reasoning Rights. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing, 2014.
- 5. Bienias, Emma, et al. “Implicit bias in the legal profession” (2017) // https://ipo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Implicit-Bias-White-Paper-2.pdf.
- 6. Blades, Nicholas, and Fernando Herrera-González. “An economic analysis of personal data protection obligations in the European Union.” 7th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS). Cambridge, United Kingdom (7-9 September 2016) // https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2018/economics/Presentations/.
- 7. Boersema, David. Philosophy of Human Rights: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, 2018.
- 8. Burazin, Luka. “Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights Norms”: 111-120. In: David Duarte and Jorge Silva Sampaio, eds. Proportionality in Law. An Analytical Perspective. Cham: Springer, 2018.
- 9. Cianciardo, Juan. “The principle of proportionality: the challenges of human rights.” Journal of Civil Law Studies 3:1 (2010): 177-185.
- 10. Clerico, Laura. “Proportionality in Social Rights Adjudication: Making it Workable”: 25-48. In: David Duarte and Jorge Silva Sampaio, eds. Proportionality in Law. An Analytical Perspective. Cham: Springer, 2018.
- 11. Dolzhikov, Alexey V. “The European Court of Human Rights on the Principle of Proportionality in ‘Russian’ Cases.” Teisė 82 (2012): 215-224.
- 12. Donnelly, Jack. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. New York: Cornelian University Press, 2013.
- 13. Duarte, David. “Gains and Losses in Balancing Social Rights”: 49-70. In: David Duarte and Jorge Silva Sampaio, eds. Proportionality in Law. An Analytical Perspective. Cham: Springer, 2018.
- 14. Dworkin, Ronald. “It is absurd to calculate human rights according to a cost-benefit analysis.” The Guardian (May24, 2006).
- 15. Endicott, Timothy. “Proportionality and Incommensurability”: 311-342. In: Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller, and Gregoire Webber, eds. Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning. Harvard: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
- 16. European Data Protection Supervisor. “About” (2018) // https://edps.europa.eu/about-edps_en.
- 17. Faigman, David L. “Madisonian Balancing: A Theory of Constitutional Adjudication.” Northwester University Law Review 88 (1994): 641-694.
- 18. Feinberg, Joel. “Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 93(1978): 223-257.
- 19. Finnis, John. “Commensuration and Public Reason”: 215-260. In: Ruth Chang’s, eds. Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.
- 20. Guntrip, Edward. “International Human Rights Law, Investment Arbitration, and Proportionality Analysis: Panacea or Pandora’s Box?” Blog of the European Journal of International Law (January 7, 2014) // https://www.ejiltalk.org/international-human-rights-law-investment-arbitration-and-proportionality-analysis-panacea-or-pandoras-box/.
- 21. Hauck, Sué González. “A Critique of Proportionality Balancing as a Harmonization Technique in International Law.” Völkerrechtsblog (5 August 2015) // DOI: 10.17176/20170920-12125.
- 22. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
- 23. Kelleher, Denis, and Karen Murray. EU Data Protection Law. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018.
- 24. Khosla, Madhav. “Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights? A Reply.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (2010): 298–306.
- 25. Lindsey, Nicole. “Understanding the GDPR Cost of Continuous Compliance” (2019) // https://www.cpomagazine.com/data-protection/understanding-the-gdpr-cost-of-continuous-compliance/.
- 26. Lopes, Pedro M. “Balancing Principles and A Forteriori Reasoning”: 137-156. In: David Duarte and Jorge Silva Sampaio, eds. Proportionality in Law. An Analytical Perspective. Cham: Springer, 2018.
- 27. Nalty, Kathleen. “Strategies for Confronting Unconscious Bias.” The Federal Lawyer (January/February 2017): 27-34.
- 28. Panagis, Nikiforos. “Putting Balancing in the Balance” (2014): 1-10 // https://tsakyrakis.wordpress.com/2014/03/20/nikiforos-panagis-putting-balancing-in-the-balance/.
- 29. Peer, Eyal, and Eyal Gamliel. “Heuristics and Biases in Judicial Decisions.” Court Review 49 (2013): 114-118.
- 30. Posner, Richard. How Judges Think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.
- 31. Posner, Richard. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.
- 32. Pyykkö, Elina. “Data protection at the cost of economic growth?” (2012) // https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/data-protection-cost-economic-growth/.
- 33. Rivers, Julian. “Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review.” The Cambridge Law Journal 65:1 (2006): 174-207.
- 34. Sampaio, Jorge S.” Proportionality in its Narrow Sense and Measuring the Intensity of Restrictions on Fundamental Rights”: 71-110. In: David Duarte and Jorge Silva Sampaio, eds. Proportionality in Law. An Analytical Perspective. Cham: Springer, 2018.
- 35. Sartor, Giovanni. “Consistency in Balancing: From Value Assessments to Factor-Based Rules”: 121-136. In: David Duarte and Jorge Silva Sampaio, eds. Proportionality in Law. An Analytical Perspective. Cham: Springer, 2018.
- 36. Sartor, Giovanni. “The Logic of Proportionality: Reasoning with Non-Numerical Magnitudes.” German Law Journal 14:8 (2013): 1419–56.
- 37. Sartor, Giovanni. “The right to be forgotten balancing interests in the flux of time.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 24 (2016): 72–98.
- 38. Schlink, Bernard. “Proportionality”: 249-266. In: Michel Rosenfeld and Andras Sajó, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
- 39. Sieckmann, Jan. “Proportionality as a Universal Human Rights Principle”: 3-48. In: David Duarteand and Jorge Silva Sampaio, eds. Proportionality in Law. An Analytical Perspective. Cham: Springer, 2018.
- 40. Souliotis, Panagiotis. “Proportionality and The European Convention on Human Rights: A Critical View” (2016): 1-30 // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2690366.
- 41. Stijn Smet, “On the Existence and Nature of Conflicts between Human Rights at the European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Law Review (2017) // DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngx016.
- 42. Tsakyrakis, Stavros. “Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?” Jean Monnet Working Paper 09/08 (2009) // https://jeanmonnetprogram.org/paper/proportionality-an-assault-on-human-rights-2.
- 43. Tyler, Tom. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57 (2006): 375-400.
- 44. Urbina, Francisco. A Critique of Proportionality and balancing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
- 45. Vranes, Erich. “Vom ‘rechten Maß’ zum globalen Rechtsgrundsatz? Schlaglichter in der Entwicklung des Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatzes” (From ‘right measure’ to global legal principle? Highlights in the development of the principle of proportionality): 99-136. In: Günter Herzig, et al., eds. Europarecht und Rechtstheorie. Wien: Verlag Österreich, 2017.
- 46. Webber, Grégoire C. “Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2010): 179-202.
- 47. Wiggins, David. “Incommensurability: Four Proposals”: 52-60. In: Ruth Chang’s, eds. Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.
- 48. Worstall, Tim. “Is GDPR worth the cost?” (2018) // https://www.computerweekly.com/opinion/Is-GDPR-worth-the-cost.
- 1. EDPS Guidelines on assessing the proportionality of measures that limit the fundamental rights to privacy and to the protection of personal data. European Data Protection Supervisor (19 December 2019) // https://edps.europa.eu/data-protection/our-work/our-work-by-type/guidelines_en.
- 2. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 On the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU-GDPR). Official Journal of the European Union L 119/1 2016.