Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Potential Legal Challenges for Blockchain Technology in Competition Law Cover

Potential Legal Challenges for Blockchain Technology in Competition Law

Open Access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. 1. Abramowicz, Michael. “Cryptocurrency-Based Law.” Arizona Law Review 58 (2016): 359-420.
  2. 2. Bradley, Robert. “On the Origins of the Sherman Antitrust Act.” Cato Journal 9 (1990): 737–742.
  3. 3. Champagne, Phil. The book of Satoshi: The collected writings of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. USA: e53 Publishing, 2014.
  4. 4. Comm’n of The European Communities, “Guidance on the Commission’s Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 Ec Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings,” Official Journal of the European Union (Dec. 3, 2008) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52009XC0224%2801%29.
  5. 5. Cong, Lin, and Zhiguo He. “Blockchain Disruption and Smart Contracts.” The Review of Financial Studies 32 (2018): 1754-1797.10.1093/rfs/hhz007
  6. 6. Cuccuru, Pierluigi. “Beyond Bitcoin: An Early Overview on Smart Contracts.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 25 (2017): 179-195.10.1093/ijlit/eax003
  7. 7. Dannen, Chris. Introducing Ethereum and Solidity: Foundations of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Programming for Beginners. New York: Apress, 2017.10.1007/978-1-4842-2535-6
  8. 8. De Filippi, Primavera. Blockchain and the law: the Rule of Code. Boston: Harvard University Press. 2018.10.2307/j.ctv2867sp
  9. 9. Desal, Kiran. Blockchain and competition law. London: Ernest & Young Law Alert, 2018 // https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-blockchain-and-competition-law/$FILE/ey-blockchain-and-competition-law.pdf.
  10. 10. Economides, Nicholas, and Ioannis Lianos. “Elusive Antitrust Standard on Bundling in Europe and in the United States in the Aftermath of the Microsoft Cases.” Antitrust law Journal 76 (2010): 483-494.
  11. 11. European Central Bank. “Why does the ECB have a stake in market infrastructure?” (2016) // https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/annual/special-features/2016/html/index.en.html.
  12. 12. Freedman, Maurice. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
  13. 13. Guegan, Dominique. “Public Blockchain Versus Private Blockhain.” Documents de travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne 1 (2017): 17020 // https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01524440/document.
  14. 14. Hong, Sunghyuck. “P2P networking based internet of things (IoT) sensor node authentication by Blockchain.” Peer-to-Peer Netw. 13 (2020): 579-589.10.1007/s12083-019-00739-x
  15. 15. Hovenkamp, Herbert J. “The Rule of Reason.” Florida Law Review 70 (2018): 81-96.
  16. 16. Huberman, Gur, Jacob Leshno, and Ciamac Moallemi. “An Economic Analysis of the Bitcoin Payment System.” Columbia Business School Research Paper 2 (2017): 17-92.10.2139/ssrn.3032375
  17. 17. IDC Trackers. “Worldwide Blockchain Spending Guide” // https://www.idc.com/tracker/showproductinfo.jsp?prod_id=1842.
  18. 18. Jenny, Frederic. “The Institutional Design of Competition Authorities: Debates and Trends,” In Competition law enforcement in the BRICS and in developing countries, pp. 1-57 (2016) // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2894893.
  19. 19. Kim, Seoung. “Ethereum Upgrades as Hard Forks Activate on Blockchain.” Coindesk, (2019).
  20. 20. Lianos, Ioannis. “Blockchain Competition.” CLES Research Paper Series 4/2018 (2018) // https://scihub.tw/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3257307.
  21. 21. Mauri, Ross. “Three Features of Blockchain that Help Prevent Fraud.” IBM (2017) // https://www.ibm.com/blogs/blockchain/2017/09/three-features-ofblockchain-thathelp-prevent-fraud.
  22. 22. May, Timothy. “The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto.” Activism (1992) // https://www.activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html.
  23. 23. Miseviciute, Jurgita. “Blockchain and virtual currency regulation in the EU.” Journal of Investment Compliance 19 (2018): 33-38.10.1108/JOIC-04-2018-0026
  24. 24. Nakamoto, Satoshi. “Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.” Bitcoin (2008) // https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
  25. 25. O’Donoghue, Robert, and Jorge Padilla. The Law and Economics of Article 102 TFEU. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.
  26. 26. OECD. Blockchain Technology and Competition Policy: Issues Paper by the Secretariat. OECD, 2018 // https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2018)47/en/pdf.
  27. 27. OECD. “Roundtable on Changes in Institutional Design.” DAF/COMP/M(2015)1/ANN6/FINAL // https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WP2/M(2015)1/ANN6/FINAL/en/pdf.
  28. 28. Østbye, Peder. “The Adequacy of Competition Policy for Cryptocurrency Markets.” Social Science Research Network (2017) // https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/the-adequacy-of-competition-policy-for-cryptocurrency-markets/.10.2139/ssrn.3025732
  29. 29. Østbye, Peder. “The Case for a 21 Million Bitcoin Conspiracy.” Journal of Financial Transformation 48 (2018): 88-97.10.2139/ssrn.3136044
  30. 30. Penz-Sharp, Alan. “Blockchain for Business: Ready or Not, Here it Comes.” CMSWire (2017) // https://www.cmswire.com/information-management/blockchain-for-business-ready-or-not-here-it-comes.
  31. 31. Posner, Eric, and Glen Weyl. Radical Markets: uprooting capitalism and democracy for a just society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.
  32. 32. Posner, Richard. Antitrust Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
  33. 33. Raval, Siraj. Decentralized Applications: Harnessing Bitcoin’s Blockchain Technology. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, 2016.
  34. 34. Roberts, Russ, and Jim Epstein. “Jim Epstein on Bitcoin, the Blockchain, and Freedom in Latin America.” Econ Talk (2017) // http://www.econtalk.org/jim-epstein-on-bitcoin-the-blockchain-and-freedom-in-latin-america/.
  35. 35. Rochet, Jean-Charles, and Jean Tirole. “Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (2003): 990-1029.10.1162/154247603322493212
  36. 36. Swan, Melanie. Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, 2015.
  37. 37. Talamo, Maurizio, Franco Arcieri, Andrea Dimitri, and Christian H. Schunck, “A Blockchain based PKI Validation System based on Rare Events Management.” Future Internet 12 (2020): 40.10.3390/fi12020040
  38. 38. Tapscott, Don, and Alex Tapscott. A Blockchain Revolution: how the technology behind Bitcoin is changing money, business and the world. New York: Penguin Ramdom House, 2016.
  39. 39. The World Bank. “Blockchain or distributed ledger technology.” The World Bank Group (2018) // http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/pt/260121548673898731/pdf/134063-WP-121278-2nd-edition-IFC-EMCompass-Blockchain-Report-PUBLIC.pdf.
  40. 40. Thomas, Ryan “Blockchains and Antitrust: new technology, same old risks.” JonesDay One Firm Wolrdwide Whitepaper (2018) // https://www.jonesday.com/blockchains-and-antitrust-new-technology-same-old-risks-08-02-2018/.
  41. 41. Tsu, Sun. The Art of War. London: Macmillan, 2017.
  42. 42. Vigna, Paul, and Michael Casey. The Truth Machine: the Blockchain and the Future of Everything. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018.
  43. 43. Walch, Angela. “The Path of the Blockchain Lexicon (and the Law).” Review of Banking & Financial Law 36 (2017): 713-718.
  44. 44. Werbach, Kevin. The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.10.7551/mitpress/11449.001.0001
  45. 45. Werbach, Kevin. “Trust, but Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 33 (2018): 487-495.
  46. 46. World Economic Forum. “Deep Shift: Technology Tipping Points and Societal Impact” (2015) // https://www.weforum.org/reports/deep-shift-technology-tipping-points-and-societal-impact.
  47. 47. Zamfir, Vlad. “Introducing Casper ‘The Friendly Ghost’.” Ethereum Blog (2015) // https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/08/01/introducing-casper-friendly-ghost.
  48. 1. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wis. v. Marshfield Clinic. (1995) 65, F.3d 1406, 1413.
  49. 2. British Airways v. Comm’n. (2003) T-219/99, E.C.R. II-5925.
  50. 3. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (1993) 509, U.S. 209, 220.
  51. 4. Cascade Health Sols. v PeaceHealth. (2007) 502, F.3d 895, 905
  52. 5. Clearstream Banking AG v. Comm’n. (2009). T-301/04, E.C.R. 317.
  53. 6. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal (2012) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012E%2FTXT [hereinafter TFEU]).
  54. 7. Deutsche Telekom AG v. Comm’n. (2010) C280/08 P, E.C.R. I-9555.
  55. 8. Eisai Inc. v Sanofi-Aventis U.S. (2014) 08-4168, WL 1343254, at *12.
  56. 9. European Night Servs. Ltd. (ENS) v. Commission. (1998) T-374/94, T375/94, T-384/94, and T-388/94, E.C.R. II-3141;
  57. 10. Google Shopping. (2017) 39740, E.C.R. 145.
  58. 11. Hynix Semiconductor Inc v. Infineon. (2010) COMP/38.636, O.J. C 30.
  59. 12. Hoffmann-La Roche and Co. AG v. Comm’n. (1979) 85/76, E.C.R. 461
  60. 13. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (2006) 547, U.S. 28.
  61. 14. Intel Corp. v. Comm’n. (2017) C-413/14 P, E.C.R. 632
  62. 15. Irish Sugar v. Comm’n. (1999) T-228/97, E.C.R. II-2975
  63. 16. Jefferson Parish Hosp. District No. 2 v. Hyde. (1984) 466, U.S. 2, 1
  64. 17. Konkurrensverket v. TeliaSonera Sverige AB. (2011) C-52/09, E.C.R. I-527.
  65. 18. LePage’s Inc. v. 3M. (2003) 324, F.3d 141, 157
  66. 19. Microsoft Corp. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc, Comm’n Decision. (2004) 3/37.792.
  67. 20. Oscar Bronner v. Mediaprint Zeitungs und Zeitschriftenverlag. (1998) C-7/97, E.C.R. I-7796.
  68. 21. Pac. Bell Tel. Co. v. LinkLine Commc’ns, Inc. (2009) 555, U.S. 438.
  69. 22. Post Danmark A/S v. Konkurrencerådet. (2012) C209/10, E.C.R. 172.
  70. 23. Telefónica and Telefónica de España v. Comm’n. (2013) C-295/12, E.C.R. 619.
  71. 24. Tomra Sys. ASA & Others v. Comm’n. (2010) T-155/06, 2010 E.C.R. II-4361
  72. 25. United States v. Microsoft Corp. (2001) 253, F.3d 34.
  73. 26. Verizon Comm. Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP. (2004) 540, U.S. 398
Language: English
Page range: 81 - 107
Submitted on: Mar 5, 2020
Accepted on: Jul 16, 2020
Published on: Oct 23, 2020
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Christophe S. Hutchinson, Maria A. Egorova, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.