Unequal Contributions: Problems within the Division of Shares in Joint Community Property

Grigienė, Jurgita; Čerka, Paulius; Štuikytė-Skužinskienė, Milda

doi:10.2478/bjlp-2020-0002

References

1. Bayles, Michael D., and W.L. Robison. The Legal Essays of Michael Bayles. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International, 2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Bishop, Susan. “Georgia Divorce: Dividing Property” // http://www.divorcenet.com/resources/divorce/marital-property-division/georgia-divorce-dividing-prope.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Boele-Woelki, Katharina. Common Core and Better Law in European Family Law. Oxford: Intersentia, 2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Branka, Rešetar. “Matrimonial Property in Europe: A Link between Sociology and Family Law.” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law Vol. 12.3 (2008): 1-18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Čivilytė – Gylienė, Viktorija. Trumpas šeimos teisės vadovas. Vilnius: Eugrimas, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Clarkson, Chris, Leicester Jonathan, and Mark Thompson. “Study on Matrimonial Property Regimes and the Property of Unmarried Couples in Private International Law And Internal Law.” Commission Européenne (2001): 1-78.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Cooke, Elizabeth, Anne Barlow, and Thérèse Callus. “Community of property A regime for England and Wales?” Great Britain The Nuffield Foundation (2006): 1-52.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Dewar, John, and Stephen Parker. Family Law: Processes, Practices, Pressures. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. “Dividing Marital Property in The Netherlands – update” // https://veldlaw.nl/en/services/family-law/dividing-marital-property-in-the-netherlands.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. “Divorce – Austria” (August 2, 2007) // http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/divorce/divorce_aus_en.htm.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Fishman, Jay E. Standards of Value: Theory and Applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Hahlo, H. R. “Matrimonial Property Regimes: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 11.3 (1973): 455-478.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Hawes, Joseph M. The Family in America: An Encyclopedia. Volume 2. California: ABC-CLIO, 2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Haynes, John M, and Stephanie Charlesworth. The Fundamentals of Family Mediation. Leichhardt: Federation Press, 1996.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Herring, Jonathan. Family law. London: Pearson Education, 2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Jänterä-Jareborg, Maarit, Margareta Brattström, and Kajsa Walleng. “National Report: Sweden.” Uppsala University (2008): 1-49.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Jenkins, Jeffrey A. The American Courts: A Procedural Approach. Canada: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Mikelėnas, Valentinas. Šeimos teisė. Vilnius: Justitia, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Miles, Joanna, and Rebecca Probert. Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets: An Inter-Disciplinary Study. USA: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Morley, Jeremy D. “Some Notes on Marriage and Divorce Law in the Netherlands” // http://www.veldlaw.nl/en/services/family-law/dividing-marital-property-inthe-netherlands/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Orecchio, Tom. “What is a ‘Fair’ Division of Property in Divorce?” // http://www.hcplive.com/physicians-money-digest/columns/physicians-wealth-manager/06-2012/Division-of-Property-During-Divorce.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Peskind, Steven. Divorce in Illinois: Understandable Answers to Your Legal Questions. USA: Addicus Books, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Rauscher, Thomas. Familienrecht. Berlin: Hüthig Jehle Rehm, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Schechter, Sara. New York Family Law. New York: Delmar, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Scherpe, Jens M. “The Financial Consequences of Divorce in a European Perspective.” European Family Law Vol. 3 (2016): 1-56.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Scherpe, Jens M. Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Comparative Perspective. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Schiratzkis, Johanna. “Swedish report in the European Commission’s”: 1-42. In: Study on Matrimonial Property Regimes and the Property of Unmarried Couples in Private International Law and Internal Law. General Direction Justice and Home Affairs, JAI/A3/2001/03. Brussels: European Commission, 2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Statsky, William. Family Law: The Essentials. USA: Cengage Learning, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Stretch, Rachael. Family Law. New York: Routledge, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Sussman, Marvin B., et al. Handbook of Marriage and the Family. New York: Plenum Press, 1999.10.1007/978-1-4757-5367-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Tamošiūnienė, Egidija, and Inga Kudinavičiūtė-Michailovienė. Šeimos bylų nagrinėjimo ir teismo sprendimų vykdymo ypatumai. Vilnius: MRU, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Vitkevičius, Pranciškus Stanislovas. Šeimos narių turtiniai teisiniai santykiai. Vilnius: Justitia, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Warendorf, H. C. S., R. L. Thomas (M.A.), and Ian Sumner. The Civil Code of the Netherlands (Alphen: Kluwer Law International, 2009).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Woelke, Andrea. “Response to Green Paper on Conflict of Laws in Matters Concerning Matrimonial Property Regimes, Including the Question of Jurisdiction and Mutual Recognition” // http://www.resolution.org.uk/site_content_files/files/resolution_response_to_green_paper_on_mat_pty_regimes_2.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
1. A. L. v R. L. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2006, no. 3K-3-251.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. A.T. v Z. T. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2017, no. 3K-3-243-969.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Charman v Charman. The High Court of Justice London, 2006, EWHC 1879 (Fam).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Civil Code of Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, no. VIII-1864.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. H. B. v J. B. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2011, no. 3K-3-517.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Matrimonial Causes Act. United Kingdom, 1973.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. N. M. v S. M. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania 2014, no. 3K-3-342.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. NY Code Domestic Relations Law (2010 10 12, New York). Dom. Rel. Law § 109-117).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. R. A. v A. A. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2010, no. 3K-P-186.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. R. D. v M. D. District Court of Šiauliai, 2017, no. 2-11-776.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. R. K. v A. K. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2004, no. 3K-3-435.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. R. M. v N. M. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2008, no. 3K-3-623.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. R. Š. v A. Š. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2015, no. 3K-3-27-686.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Sutuokinių turtines prievoles reglamentuojančių teisės normų taikymas. The Review of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, Nr. AC-40-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Sykes v Sykes. Supreme Court, NY Slip Op 50731(U) (2014).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. The Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) (1881). Veröffentlicht 1991 01 01, § 1381 Leistungsverweigerung wegen grober Unbilligkeit (2).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. The Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) (1881). Veröffentlicht 1991 01 01, § 1416 Gesamtgut (1).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. The Family Law Act (1975 06 12, Australia). Published No. 53, (Cth) (“FLA”) (1976).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. V. J. v O. A. J. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2009, no. 3K-3-577.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. V. Z. v D. Z. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2007, no. 3K-3-463.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Ž. V. v J. V. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania 2007, no. 3K-3-220.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Unequal Contributions: Problems within the Division of Shares in Joint Community Property

References

Paradigm

My account