Protecting the Right to Emergency Medical Service in the European Court of Human Rights and Collective Complaint Procedure

Uusitalo, Jenna

doi:10.2478/bjlp-2018-0003

References

1. Andrade, S. E., et al. “A systematic review of validated methods for identifying cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack using administrative data,” Pharmathe Coepidemiology and Drug Safety 21 (2012): 100–128.10.1002/pds.2312
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Beddard, Ralph. Human Rights and Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge Grotius Publications, 1993.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Churchill, Robin R., and Urfan Khaliq. “The Collective Complaints System of the European Social Charter: an Effective Mechanism for Ensuring Compliance with Economic and Social Rights?” European Journal of International Law 15 (2004): 417–456.10.1093/ejil/15.3.417
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Cohen-Jonathan, G. “Respect for Private and Family Life”: 405–444. In: McDonald, et al., eds. The European System for the Protection of Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff Dordrecht, 1993.10.1163/9789004633599_022
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Council of Europe. “Chart of signatures and ratifications of the convention 005” (12 February 2018) // http://www.theCoE.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/005/signatures?p_auth=IHX23mQ7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Council of Europe. “Chart of signatures and ratifications of the convention no 158” (12 February 2018) // http://www.theCoE.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/158/signatures?p_auth=gV2pnvym.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Council of Europe. “Chart of signatures and ratifications of the convention no 163” (12 February 2018) // http://www.theCoE.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/163/signatures?p_auth=1zaCooN0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Council of Europe. Explanatory Report to Additional Protocol to the European Social Charter Providing for a System of Collective Complaints. Strasbourg: 1995.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Council of Europe. Explanatory Report to the revised European Social Charter. Strasburg, 1996.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Council of Europe. “Reservations and Declarations relating to the 1995 Protocol Providing a System of Collective Complaints” (12 February 2018) // https://rm.theCoE.int/TheCoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900 00168048b059.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Council of Europe. Social Protection in the European Social Charter: Social Charter monographs – No 7. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publications, 2000.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. De Shutter, Oliver. “The European Social Charter”: 463–480. In Catarina Krause and Martin Scheinin, eds. International Protection of Human Rights: A Textbook. Turku: Åbo Academy University Institute for Human Rights, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Drzewicki, Krzystof. “European System for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights”: 397–422. In: Catarina Krause and Martin Scheinin, eds. International Protection of Human Rights: A Textbook. Turku: Academy University Institute for Human Rights, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. European Committee of Social Rights. European Social Charter (revised): Conclusions 2009 – Volume 1. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publications, 2010.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. European Court of Human Rights. Research Report: The New Admissibility Criterion under Article 35 § 3 (b) of the Convention: The Case-law Principles Two Years on. Council of Europe/the European Court of Human Rights, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Fusch, Klaus. “The European Social Charter: Its Role in Present-Day Europe and its Reforms”: 151–168. In: Krzysztof Drzwicki, Catarina Krause, and Alan Rosas, eds. Social Rights as Human Rights: A European Challenge Turku: Åbo Akademi University Institute for Human Rights, 1994.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Gerards, Janneke H., and Lize R. Glas. “Access to justice in the European Convention on Human Rights system,” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 35 (2017): 11–30.10.1177/0924051917693988
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Gouien, Donna, David Harris, and Leo Zwaak. Law and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights and European Social Charter. Strasbourg: Council of European Publishing, 1996.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Harris, David. “The Council of Europe (II): the European Social Charter”: 307–328. In: Raija Hanski and Markku Suksi, eds. An Introduction to the International protection of Human Rights: A Textbook. Turku: Institute for Human Rights, Åbo Academy, 2000.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Jacobs, Francis G. The Sovereignty of Law: the European Way. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511493706
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Juskevicius, Jonas, and Janina Balsienė. “Human Rights in Health Care: Some Remarks on the Limits of the Right to Health Care.” Jurisprudentia 4 (2010): 95–110.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Kapuy, Klaus, Danny Pieters, and Berhard Zaglmayer. Social Security Cases in Europe: the European Court of Human Rights. Antwer – Oxford – Portland: Intersentia, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Kerikmäe, Tanel, and Katrin Nyman-Metcalf. “Less is More or More is More? Revisiting Universality of Human Rights.” International and Comparative Law Review 12 (2012): 39–56.10.1515/iclr-2016-0077
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Kerikmäe, Tanel, Ondrej Hamulak, and Archil Chochia. “A Historical Study of Contemporary Human Rights: Deviation or Extinction?” Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum 4 (2016): 98–115.10.11590/abhps.2016.2.06
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Lawson, Rick. “The European Convention on Human Rights”: 423–462. In: Catarina Krause and Martin Scheinin, eds. International Protection of Human Rights: A Textbook. Turku: Åbo Academy Institute for Human Rights, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Leach, Philip, Helen Hardman, et al. Responding to Systemic Human Rights Violations: An Analysis of ‘Pilot Judgements’ of the European Court of Human Rights and their Impact at National Level. Antwerp – Oxford – Portland: Intersentia, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Loucaides, Loukis G. “Restrictions or limitations on the Rights Guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights”: 334–388. In: Martti Koskenniemi, et al., eds. Finnish Yearbook of International Law IV. Helsinki: Ius Gentium Association, 1993.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Mc Innes, Colin, and Kelly Lee. “Health, Security and Foreign Policy.” Review of International Studies 32 (2006): 5–23.10.1017/S0260210506006905
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Merrills, J.G., and A.H. Robertson. Human Rights in Europe: a Study of European Convention on Human Rights. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Miller, Vaughne. “Is Adherence to the European Convention on Human Rights a Condition of European Union Membership?” Standard Note SN/IA/6577 (March 25, 2014).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Mowbray, Alastair. Cases and Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Ni Aolain, Fionnuala. “Transitional Emergency Jurisprudence: Derogation and Transition”: 24–51. In: Antoine Buyse and Michael Hamilton, eds. Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR: Justice, Politics and Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511758515.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Perkins, G. D., et al. “European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Adult Basic Life Support and Automated External Defibrillation.” Resuscitation 95 (2015): 81–99.10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.029
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Roffi, Marco, et al. “2015 ECG Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment evaluation.” European Heart Journal 37 (2015): 267–315.10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Schabas, William A. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.10.1093/law/9780199594061.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political [1929]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Shaw, Malcom N. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Smith, Rhona K. M. International Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö. “Työryhmä Selvittää Lääkärihelikopterien Uusien Tukikohtien Sijoituspaikkakunnat.” Briefing 58/2018 (2018) (Ministry of Social Welfare and Health [of Finland], Working Group Established to Determine the Geographical Bases for New HEMSs).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
40. Steiner, Henry J., and Philip Alston. International Human Rights in Context: Law, Practice and Morals. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
41. Toebes, Brigit. “The Right to Health”: 169–190. In: Alan Rosas, Catarina Krause, and Asbjorn Eide, eds. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 2001.10.1163/9789047433866_014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
42. United Nation’s Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). General Comment no. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). 2000, dnro E/C.12/2000/4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
43. Waddington, Lisa. “Unravelling the Knot: Article 8, Private Life, Positive Duties and Disability: Rewriting Sentges v. Netherlands”: 329–351. In: Eva Brems, ed. Diversity and European Human Rights: Rewriting judgements of the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.10.1017/CBO9781139208130.021
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
44. Yamin, Alicia Ely. “Toward Transformative Accountability: Applying a Rights-based Approach to Fulfill Maternal Health Obligations.” International Journal on Human Rights 7 (2010): 94–121.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
1. A v. United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), 1998, 27 EHRR 611.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Additional Protocol to the European Social Charter Providing for a System of Collective Complaints. 9 Nov. 1995, CETS No. 158.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Aksoy v. Turkey. ECtHR, 1996, 23 EHRR 553.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Association X v. UK. ECtHR, 1978, 14 DR 31.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Ayuntamiento De Mula v. Spain. ECtHR, 2001, application no 55346/0).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Belgian Linguistic Case (No 2). ECtHR, 1968, 1 EHRR 252.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Brincat and Others v. Malta. ECtHR, 2014, Applications nos. 60908/11, 62110/11, 62129/11, 62312/11 and 62338/11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Budayeva and others v. Russia. ECtHR, 2008, application no 15339/02.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Chahal v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 1997, 23 EHRR 413.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Celniku v. Greece. ECtHR, 2007, application no 21449/04.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Malacu and Others v. Romania. ECtHR,
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2016, Application no. 55093/09.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Christine Goodwin v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 2002, 35 EHRR 18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL) v. Italy. ECSR, 2015, complaint no. 91/2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 4 Nov.1950, ETS No. 005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Costello-Roberts v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 1993, 19 EHRR 112.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. D v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 1997, 24 EHRR 423.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Danderyds Kommun v. Sweden. ECtHR, 2001, application no 52559/99.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Decision of Parliamentary Ombudsman [of Finland]. 2015, Dnro 1989/4/14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Defence for Children International (DCI) v. Belgium. European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR), 2012, complaint no 69/2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Dudgeon v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 1982, 4 EHRR 149.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Elefteriadis v. Romania. ECtHR, 2011, application no. 38427/05.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Ergi v. Turkey. ECtHR, 2001, 32 EHRR 18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. European Council of Police Trade Unions (CESP) v. France. ECSR, 2002, complaint no 68/2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. European Federation of Employees in Public Service v. France. ECSR, 2000, complaint no 2/1999.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. European Roma Rights Center (ERRC) v. Bulgaria. ESCR, 2005, complaint no
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31/2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. European Social Charter. 18 Oct. 1961, CETS No 035.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. European Social Charter (revised). 3 May 1996, CETS No. 163.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Fadeyeva v. Russia. ECtHR, 2005, ECHR 376.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Federation of Catholic Families in Europe (FAFCE) v. Sweden. ECSR, 2015, complaint no 99/2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. FIDH v. Greece. ECSR, 2013, complaint no 72/2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. FIDH v. France. ECSR, 2004, complaint no 14/2003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Finnish Society of Social Rights v. Finland. ECSR, 2014, complaint no 88/2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Flamenbaum and Others v. France. ECtHR, 2012, applications nos. 3675/04 and 23264/04.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Folgero and others v. Norway. ECtHR, 2006, application no 15427/02.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Fudrik v. Slovakia. ECtHR, 2008, Application no. 42994/05.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Gard and Others v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 2017, application no. 39793/17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Giacomelli v. Italy. ECtHR, 2007, Application no. 59909/00.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Glass v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 2004, 39 EHRR 15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. Guerra and others v. Italy. ECtHR, 1998, 26 EHRR 357.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
40. Handyside v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 1976, 1 EHRR 737.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
41. Hatton and others v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 2003, 37 EHRR 28.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
42. Hebat Aslan and Firas Aslan v. Turkey. ECtHR, 2014, application no 15048/09.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
43. Herczegfavly v. Austria. ECtHR, 1993, 15 EHRR 437.10.1159/000111371
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
44. Hurtado v. Switzerland. ECtHR, 1994, the ECHR 25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
45. Hämäläinen v. Finland. ECtHR, 2014, Application no. 37359/09.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
46. IAAE v. France. ECSR, 2003, complaint no 13/2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
47. ICJ v. Portugal. ESCR, 1999, complaint no 1/1998.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
48. International Covenant of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 16 Dec. 1966, 999 UNTS 171.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
49. International Federation of Human Rights Leagues (IFHR) v. Ireland. ECSR, 2008, complaint no 42/2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
50. Ioniță v. Romania. ECtHR, 2017, application no. 81270/12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
51. Jalloh v. Germany. ECtHR, 2006, the ECHR 721.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
52. Johnston v. Ireland. ECtHR, 1987, 9 EHRR 203.10.2307/20625864
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
53. Karelin v. Russia. ECtHR, 2016, Application no 926/08.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
54. Keegan v. Ireland. ECtHR, 1994, 18 EHRR 342.10.1515/labm.1994.18.7-8.342
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
55. Keenan v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 2001, 33 EHR 38.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
56. Khan v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 2001, 31 EHRR 45.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
57. Klass v. Germany. ECtHR, 1979-1980, 2 EHRR 214.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
58. Krone Verlag GmbH & Co KGv. Austria. ECtHR, 2003, 36 EHRR 57.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
59. LBC v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 1998, 27 EHRR 212.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
60. Lopez Ostra v. Spain. ECtHR, 1994, 20 EHRR 277.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
61. Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey. ECtHR, 2000, ECHR 129.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
62. Martin and 22 others v. Spain. ECtHR, 1992, 73 DR 120.10.1080/08911916.1992.11643849
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
63. McCann and others v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 1995, 21 EHRR 97.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
64. Medecins du Monde – International v. France. ECSR, 2012, complaint no 67/2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
65. MFHR v. Greece. ECSR, 2006, complaint no 30/2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
66. M.N. and Others v. San Marino. ECtHR, 2015, Application no. 28005/12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
67. Moldovan and others v. Romania (No 2). ECtHR, 2005, Application no 41138/98 and 643210/01.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
68. Mojsiejew v. Poland. ECtHR, 2009, App no 11818/02.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
69. Niemietz v. Germany. ECtHR, 1992, 16 EHRR 97.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
70. Norris v. Ireland. ECtHR, 1988, 13 EHRR 186.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
71. Osman v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 1998, EHRR 245.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
72. Peck v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 2003, 36 EHRR 4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
73. Pretty v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 2002, the ECHR 427.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
74. Poa and Others v. the United Kingdom. ECtHR, 2013, application no 59253/11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
75. Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Re-structuring the Control Machinery Established Thereby. 11 May 1994, CETS No. 155.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
76. Protocol no 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Amending the Control System of the Convention. 13 May 2004, CETS No. 194.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
77. Selmouni v. France. ECtHR, 2000, 29 EHRR 403.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
78. Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia. ECtHR, 2002, application no 46133/99 and 48183/99.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
79. Soering v. UK. ECtHR, 1989, 11 EHRR 439.10.1016/S0387-7604(89)80035-X
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
80. Storck v. Germany. ECtHR, 2005, application no 61603/00.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
81. Terveydenhuoltolaki. 1326/2011 [Health Care Act of Finland].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
82. Tervishoiuteenuste korraldamise seadus. RT I 2001, 50, 284 [Health Service Organisation Act of Estonia].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
83. Thlimmenos v. Greece. ECtHR, 2000, application no 34369/97.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
84. Tomasi v. France. ECtHR, 1993, 15 EHRR 1).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
85. Tyrer v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 1978, 2 EHRR 1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
86. Tysiac v. Poland. ECtHR, 2007, 45 EHRR 42.10.1176/pn.42.23.0045
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
87. Union Syndicale des Magistrats Administratifs (USMA) v. France. ECSR, 2013, complaint no 84/2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
88. Vereinigung Democratisher Soldaten Osterreichs and Gubi v. Austria. ECtHR, 1995, 20 EHRR 56.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
89. Vienna Convention on Law of the Treaties. 1155 UNITS 331, 23. May 1969.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
90. Vilnes and Others v. Norway. ECtHR, 2013, application no. 52806/09.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
91. Vo v. France. ECtHR, 2005, 40 EHRR 12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
92. Winterwerp v. the Netherlands. ECtHR, 1979, 2 EHRR 387.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
93. X v. Finland. ECtHR, 2012, Application no. 34806/04.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
94. X and Y v. Netherlands. ECtHR, 1986, 8 EHRR 235.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
95. Yankov v. Bulgaria. ECtHR, 2005, 40 EHRR 36.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
96. Y.F v. Turkey. ECtHR, 2003, the ECHR 391.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
97. Z and others v. United Kingdom. ECtHR, 2002, 34 EHRR 3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
98. Zivic v. Serbia. ECtHR, 2011, application no 37204/08.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
99. Öneryildiz v. Turkey. ECtHR, 2005, 41 EHRR 20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Protecting the Right to Emergency Medical Service in the European Court of Human Rights and Collective Complaint Procedure

References

Paradigm

My account