Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unification of Judicial Practice Concerning Parental Responsibility in the European Union – Challenges Applying Regulation Brussels II Bis Cover

Unification of Judicial Practice Concerning Parental Responsibility in the European Union – Challenges Applying Regulation Brussels II Bis

Open Access
|Oct 2014

References

  1. 1. Beaumont, Paul. R., and Lara Walker. “Shifting the Balance Achieved by the Abduction Convention: the Contrasting Approaches of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice.” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 7, No. 2 (August, 2011): 231-249.10.5235/174410411796868689
  2. 2. Beaumont, Paul R., and Peter E. McEleavy. The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Oxford University Press, 2004.
  3. 3. Boele-Woelki, Katharina, and Cristina Gonzalez Beilfuss. Brussels II bis: Its Impact and Application in Member States. Antwerpen - Oxford: Intersentia, 2007.
  4. 4. Fiorini, A. “Rome III Choice of Law in Divorce: is the Europeanization of Family Law Going Too Far?” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family No. 22 (2008): 178-205.10.1093/lawfam/ebn006
  5. 5. Francq, Stéphanie. “Parental Responsibility under ‘Brussels II’.” ERA Forum, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2003): 54-72.10.1007/s12027-003-0018-8
  6. 6. Jarukaitis, Irmantas. Europos Sąjunga ir Lietuvos Respublika: konstituciniai narystės pagrindai (European Union and the Republic of Lithuania: constitutional elements of the membership). Vilnius: Justitia, 2011.
  7. 7. Kruger, Thalia. Civil Jurisdiction Rules of the European Union and their Impact on Third States. Oxford University Press, 2008.
  8. 8. Magnus, Ulrich, et al. Brussels II bis Regulation. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2012.10.1515/9783866539044
  9. 9. Martiny, Dieter. “Hague Conventions in Private International Law and on International Civil Procedure”: 682-683. In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Vol. 4. Oxford University Press, 2012.
  10. 10. McEleavy, Peter. “Brussels II bis: Matrimonial Matters, Parental Responsibility, Child Abduction and Mutual Recognition.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly Vol. 53, Issue 2 (April 2004): 503-512.10.1093/iclq/53.2.503
  11. 11. Official information of the State Child Rights Protection and Adoption Service under the Ministry of Social Security and Labour // http://www.vaikoteises.lt (accessed May 29, 2014).
  12. 12. Rauscher, Thomas. Europäisches Zivilprozeßrecht. Kommentar. 2. Auflage. Band 1. München: Sellier, European Law Publishers GmbH, 2006.
  13. 13. Ripley, Peter. “A Defence of the Established Approach to the Grave Risk Exception in the Hague Child Abduction Convention.” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 4, No. 3 (December, 2008): 443-477.10.1080/17536235.2008.11424347
  14. 14. Trimmings, Katarina. Children Abduction Within the European Union. Studies in Private International Law. Hart Publishing, 2013.
  15. 15. Župan, Mirela. “EU Enforcement Mechanisms Serving the Best Interest of a Child.” Presentation in the conference “Enforcement of courts decisions as a condition for an effective judicial protection” which was held on 24‒25 of October 2013 in the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania.
Language: English
Page range: 113 - 127
Submitted on: May 11, 2014
|
Accepted on: Jun 30, 2014
|
Published on: Oct 8, 2014
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2014 Kristina Pranevičienė, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.