Unification of Judicial Practice Concerning Parental Responsibility in the European Union – Challenges Applying Regulation Brussels II Bis
References
- 1. Beaumont, Paul. R., and Lara Walker. “Shifting the Balance Achieved by the Abduction Convention: the Contrasting Approaches of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice.” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 7, No. 2 (August, 2011): 231-249.
- 2. Beaumont, Paul R., and Peter E. McEleavy. The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Oxford University Press, 2004.
- 3. Boele-Woelki, Katharina, and Cristina Gonzalez Beilfuss. Brussels II bis: Its Impact and Application in Member States. Antwerpen - Oxford: Intersentia, 2007.
- 4. Fiorini, A. “Rome III Choice of Law in Divorce: is the Europeanization of Family Law Going Too Far?” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family No. 22 (2008): 178-205.
- 5. Francq, Stéphanie. “Parental Responsibility under ‘Brussels II’.” ERA Forum, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2003): 54-72.
- 6. Jarukaitis, Irmantas. Europos Sąjunga ir Lietuvos Respublika: konstituciniai narystės pagrindai (European Union and the Republic of Lithuania: constitutional elements of the membership). Vilnius: Justitia, 2011.
- 7. Kruger, Thalia. Civil Jurisdiction Rules of the European Union and their Impact on Third States. Oxford University Press, 2008.
- 8. Magnus, Ulrich, et al. Brussels II bis Regulation. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2012.
- 9. Martiny, Dieter. “Hague Conventions in Private International Law and on International Civil Procedure”: 682-683. In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Vol. 4. Oxford University Press, 2012.
- 10. McEleavy, Peter. “Brussels II bis: Matrimonial Matters, Parental Responsibility, Child Abduction and Mutual Recognition.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly Vol. 53, Issue 2 (April 2004): 503-512.
- 11. Official information of the State Child Rights Protection and Adoption Service under the Ministry of Social Security and Labour // http://www.vaikoteises.lt (accessed May 29, 2014).
- 12. Rauscher, Thomas. Europäisches Zivilprozeßrecht. Kommentar. 2. Auflage. Band 1. München: Sellier, European Law Publishers GmbH, 2006.
- 13. Ripley, Peter. “A Defence of the Established Approach to the Grave Risk Exception in the Hague Child Abduction Convention.” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 4, No. 3 (December, 2008): 443-477.
- 14. Trimmings, Katarina. Children Abduction Within the European Union. Studies in Private International Law. Hart Publishing, 2013.
- 15. Župan, Mirela. “EU Enforcement Mechanisms Serving the Best Interest of a Child.” Presentation in the conference “Enforcement of courts decisions as a condition for an effective judicial protection” which was held on 24‒25 of October 2013 in the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2014-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Language: English
Page range: 113 - 127
Submitted on: May 11, 2014
Accepted on: Jun 30, 2014
Published on: Oct 8, 2014
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2014 Kristina Pranevičienė, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.