Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The human network revisited: responses to Brynnar Swenson’s “The human network: social media and the limit of politics” Cover

The human network revisited: responses to Brynnar Swenson’s “The human network: social media and the limit of politics”

Open Access
|Feb 2014

References

  1. 1. Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.
  2. 2. Attia, Ashraf M., Nergis Aziz, Barry Friedman, and Mahdy F. Elhusseiny. “Commentary: The impact of social networking tools on political change in Egypt’s ‘Revolution 2.0’.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 10 (2011): 369-374.10.1016/j.elerap.2011.05.003
  3. 3. Benjamin, Walter. “Critique of Violence”: 277-301. In: Walter Benjamin.Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. New York: Schocken Books, 1986.
  4. 4. Birch, Sarah, and Nicholas Allen. “‘There will be Burning and a-Looting Tonight’: The Social and Political Correlates of Law-Breaking.” The Political Quarterly 83(1) (2012): 33-43.10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02269.x
  5. 5. Cannistraro, Vincent. “Arab Spring: A Partial Awakening.” Mediterranean Quarterly 22(4) (2011): 36-45.10.1215/10474552-1471494
  6. 6. Chiesa, Lorenzo. “Lacan with Artaud: j’ouïs-sens, jouis-sens, jouis-sans.” In: Slavoj Žižek, ed. Lacan: The Silent Partners. London and New York: Verso, 2006.
  7. 7. Christensen, Christian. “Discourses of Technology and Liberation: State Aid to Net Activists in an Era of ‘Twitter Revolutions’.” The Communication Review 14 (2011): 233-253.10.1080/10714421.2011.597263
  8. 8. De Wilde, Marc. “Violence in the State of Exception Reflections on Theologico- Political Motifs in Benjamin and Schmitt”: 188-200. In: Hent de Vries and Lawrence E. Sullivan, eds. Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post- Secular World. New York: Fordham University Press, 2006
  9. 9. Durodié, Bill. “The Changing Nature of Riots in the Contemporary Metropolis from Ideology to Identity: Lessons from the Recent UK Riots.” Journal of Risk Research 15(4) (2012): 347-354.10.1080/13669877.2011.643479
  10. 10. El-Khawas, Mohamed. “Egypt’s Unfinished Revolution.” Mediterranean Quarterly 23(1) (2012): 52-66.10.1215/10474552-1540693
  11. 11. Etling, Bruce, Robert Faris, and John Palfrey. “Political Change in the Digital Age: The Fragility and Promise of Online Organizing.” SAIS Review 30(2) (2010): 37-49.10.1353/sais.2010.0016
  12. 12. Homer, Sean. Jacques Lacan. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.10.4324/9780203347232
  13. 13. Howard, Philip N., and Muzammil M. Hussain. “The Role of Digital Media.” Journal of Democracy 22(3) (2011): 35-48.10.1353/jod.2011.0041
  14. 14. Kalmo, Hent. “A Matter of Fact? The Many Faces of Sovereignty”: 114-131. In Hent Kalmo and Quentin Skinner, eds. Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.10.1017/CBO9780511675928
  15. 15. Kellner, Douglas. “The Dark Side of the Spectacle: Terror in Norway and the UK Riots.” Cultural Politics 8(1) (2012): 1-43.10.1215/17432197-1571967
  16. 16. Kordela, A. Kiarina. Surplus: Spinoza, Lacan. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007.
  17. 17. Lacan, Jacques. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge, 1992.
  18. 18. Lacan, Jacques. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-analysis. London and New York: Penguin Books, 1994.
  19. 19. Miller, David, ed. The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought. Oxford and Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 2000.
  20. 20. Mouffe, Chantall. On the Political. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
  21. 21. Phillips, Richard, Diane Frost, and Alex Singleton. “Researching the Riots.” The Geographical Journal (2012): 1-8.10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00463.x
  22. 22. Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
  23. 23. Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press, 1985.
  24. 24. Springborg, Robert. “Whither the Arab Spring? 1989 or 1848?” The International Spectator 46(3) (2011): 5-12.10.1080/03932729.2011.609357
  25. 25. Stavrakakis, Yannis. Lacan and the Political. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.
  26. 26. Swenson, Brynnar. “The Human Network: Social Media and the Limit of Politics.” Baltic Journal of Law and Politics 4:2 (2011): 102-124.10.2478/v10076-011-0014-3
  27. 27. Tufekci, Zeynep, and Christopher Wilson. “Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square.” Journal of Communication 62 (2012): 363-379.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
  28. 28. Van Laer, Jeroen, and Peter Van Aelst. “Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires: Opportunities and Limitations.” Information, Communication & Society 13(8) (2010): 1146-1171.10.1080/13691181003628307
  29. 29. Way, Lucan. “Comparing the Arab Revolts: The Lessons of 1989.” Journal of Democracy 22(4) (2011): 13-23.10.1353/jod.2011.0068
  30. 30. Youssef, Carolyn M. “Recent Events in Egypt and the Middle East: Background, Direct Observations and a Positive Analysis.” Organizational Dynamics 40 (2011): 222-234.10.1016/j.orgdyn.2011.04.010
  31. 31. Žižek, Slavoj. Violence. New York: Picador, 2008.
  32. 32. Žižek, Slavoj. Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham: Duke University Press, 1993.
Language: English
Page range: 124 - 148
Published on: Feb 27, 2014
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2014 Ignas Kalpokas, J.D. Mininger, Viktorija Rusinaitė, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.