Open-Source Intelligence and the Right to a Fair Trial: Balancing Investigative Efficiency with Procedural Guarantees
By: Renis Sheshi
References
- Aksamitowska, K. (2021). Digital evidence in domestic core international crimes prosecutions: Lessons learned from Germany, Sweden, Finland and the Netherlands. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 19(1), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab035
- Bărbulescu v. Romania (Grand Chamber) (2017, September 5). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177082
- Bazzell, M. (2023). OSINT techniques: Resources for uncovering online information (10th ed.). IntelTechniques. https://inteltechniques.com/book1.html
- Benedik v. Slovenia (2018, April 24). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182455
- Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (Grand Chamber) (2021, May 25). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
- Böhm, I., & Lolagar, S. (2021). Open source intelligence: Introduction, legal, and ethical considerations. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 2(2), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-021-00042-7
- Centrum för Rättvisa v. Sweden (Grand Chamber) (2021, May 25). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210078
- Council of Europe. (2022). Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence (CETS No. 224). https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/224
- Custers, B. (2024). A fair trial in complex technology cases: Why courts and judges need a basic understanding of complex technologies. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105935
- Custers, B., & Stevens, L. (2021). The use of data as evidence in Dutch criminal courts. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 29(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10015
- De Hert, P., & Gutwirth, S. (2006). Privacy, data protection and law enforcement. Opacity of the individual and transparency of power. In E. Claes, A. Duff, & S. Gutwirth (Eds.), Privacy and the criminal law (pp. 61–104). Intersentia.
- Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom (Grand Chamber) (2004, October 27). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67226
- Eurojust. (n.d.). Western Balkans Criminal Justice (WBCJ) Project: Enhancing cross-border cooperation in criminal justice in the Western Balkans. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/western-balkans-criminal-justice
- Galič, M. (2021). De rechten van de verdediging in de context van omvangrijke datasets en geavanceerde zoekmachines in strafzaken: Een suggestie voor uitbreiding. Boom Strafblad, 2(2), 41–49. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3838680
- Ghioni, R., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2024). Open source intelligence and AI: A systematic review of the GELSI literature. AI & Society, 39(4), 1827–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01628-x
- Ladkin, P. B., Littlewood, B., Thimbleby, H., & Thomas, M. (2020). The Law Commission presumption concerning the dependability of computer evidence. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 17, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v17i0.5143
- Lagerwaard, P. (2023). Financial surveillance and the role of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) in the Netherlands. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(7), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2022-0134
- López Ribalda and Others v. Spain (Grand Chamber) (2019, October 17). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-197098
- Mason, S., & Seng, D. (Eds.). (2021). Electronic evidence and electronic signatures (5th ed.). Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London.
- OHCHR & Human Rights Center, University of California, Berkeley. (2022). Berkeley Protocol on digital open source investigations. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/OHCHR_BerkeleyProtocol.pdf
- Quattrocolo, S., Anglano, C., Canonico, M., & Guazzone, M. (2020). Technical solutions for legal challenges: Equality of arms in criminal proceedings. Global Jurist, 20(1), 20190058. https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2019-0058
- Roman Zakharov v. Russia (Grand Chamber) (2015, December 4). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159324
- Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom (2000, February 16). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58496
- Sachoulidou, A. (2024). Going beyond the “common suspects”: To be presumed innocent in the era of algorithms, big data and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 32(4), 1397–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09347-w
- Sampson, F. (2016). Following the breadcrumbs: Using open source intelligence as evidence in criminal proceedings. In B. Akhgar, P. S. Bayerl, & F. Sampson (Eds.), Open source intelligence investigation: From strategy to implementation (pp. 295–304). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47671-1_18
- Sampson, F. (2017). Intelligent evidence: Using open source intelligence as evidence for serious crime. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 90(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X16671031
- Stoykova, R. (2021). Digital evidence: Unaddressed threats to fairness and the presumption of innocence. Computer Law & Security Review, 42, 105575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575
- Stoykova, R. (2023). The right to a fair trial as a conceptual framework for digital evidence rules in criminal investigations. Computer Law & Security Review, 49, 105801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105801
- Stoykova, R. (2024). A new right to procedural accuracy: A governance model for digital evidence in criminal proceedings. Computer Law & Security Review, 55, 106040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106040
- U.S. Department of Justice, OPDAT. (n.d.). Europe region. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-opdat/worldwide-activities/central-and-eastern-europe-region
- Wells, D., & Gibson, H. (2017). OSINT from a UK perspective: Considerations from the law enforcement and military domains. In Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Security Sciences, 16, 84–113. https://shura.shu.ac.uk/17412/2/OSINT_EASS.pdf
- Yüksel Yalçınkaya v. Türkiye (Grand Chamber) (2023, September 26). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-227636
Language: English
Page range: 134 - 150
Published on: May 10, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Renis Sheshi, published by International Institute for Private, Commercial and Competition Law
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.