Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital assets in the United States: a legal and institutional overview Cover

Digital assets in the United States: a legal and institutional overview

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Arizona Legislature (2017) H.B. 2417: Blockchain technology; smart contracts, 53rd Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. State of Arizona.
  2. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2022) Money and payments: the U.S. dollar in the age of digital transformation. Washington, D.C.
  3. California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (2011) Money transmitters.Commodity Exchange Act (1936) 7 U.S.C. §§ 1–27f, U.S. Congress.
  4. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (2021) Digital assets: clarifying CFTC regulatory authority. Washington, D.C.
  5. ‘Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. McDonnell’ (2018) 287 F. Supp. 3d 213 (E.D.N.Y.).
  6. ‘Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Ooki DAO’ (2023) No. 3:22-cv-05416 (N.D. Cal.).
  7. Executive Office of the President (2022) Ensuring responsible development of digital assets. 87 FR 14143. Washington, D.C: Federal Register.
  8. Executive Office of the President (2025) Strengthening American leadership in digital financial technology. Washington, D.C: Federal Register.
  9. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (2019) Application of FinCEN’s regulations to certain business models involving convertible virtual currencies (FIN-2019-G001). U.S. Department of the Treasury, 9 May. Available at: https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/2019-05/FinCEN%20Guidance%20CVC%20FINAL%20508.pdf (Accessed: 11 January 2026).
  10. Financial Stability Oversight Council (2024) 2024 annual report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Treasury.
  11. Guiding and establishing national innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) (2022) Public Law 119-27, Washington, D.C.
  12. House Committee on Financial Services, U.S. Congress (2025) H.R. 3633 – Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act of 2025. Washington, D.C.: U.S. House of Representatives.
  13. Internal Revenue Service (2014) Notice 2014-21: guidance on virtual currency. Available at: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-14-21.pdf (Accessed: 7 January 2026).
  14. Internal Revenue Service (2026) Digital assets. Available at: https://www.irs.gov/filing/digital-assets (Accessed: 2 March 2026).
  15. McJohn, S. and Graham, L. (2023–2024) ‘The Uniform Commercial Code embraces blockchain’, Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal, 52(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4611794
  16. Moringiello, J. and Odinet, C. (2019) ‘The property law of tokens’, Florida Law Review, 72(3), pp. 607–656.
  17. New York State Department of Financial Services (2015) NYDFS announces approval of first BitLicense application from a virtual currency firm. New York: NYDFS.
  18. Office of Foreign Assets Control (2021) Sanctions compliance guidance for the virtual currency industry. U.S. Department of the Treasury. Available at: https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/913571/download (Accessed: 11 January 2026).
  19. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (2026) Implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act: notice of proposed rulemaking. Washington, D.C.
  20. President’s Working Group on Financial Markets (2021) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Report on stablecoins. Washington, D.C.
  21. Rajic, T. and Dohr, P. (2026) ‘Unstable coins: stablecoin regulation, market structure legislation, and U.S. security risks’, CSIS, 12 January. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/unstable-coins-stablecoin-regulation-market-structure-legislation-and-us-security-risks (Accessed: 11 January 2026).
  22. Responsible Financial Innovation Act (2023) S. 2281, 118th Congress, U.S. Congress.
  23. Schroeder, J. (2016) ‘Bitcoin and the Uniform Commercial Code’, University of Miami Business Law Review, 24(3), pp. 1–48.
  24. ‘SEC v. W.J. Howey Co.’ (1946) 328 U.S. 293.
  25. ‘Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kik Interactive Inc.’ (2020) 492 F. Supp. 3d 169 (S.D.N.Y.).
  26. ‘Securities and Exchange Commission v. LBRY, Inc.’ (2022) 639 F. Supp. 3d 211 (D.N.H.).
  27. ‘Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs, Inc.’ (2023) No. 20-cv-10832 (S.D.N.Y.).
  28. ‘Securities and Exchange Commission v. Telegram Group, Inc.’ (2020), 448 F. Supp. 3d 352 (S.D.N.Y.).
  29. ‘Securities and Exchange Commission v. Terraform Labs Pte. Ltd.’ (2023) No. 23-cv-01346, 2023 WL 4858299 (S.D.N.Y.).
  30. Securities and Exchange Commission (2017) Report of investigation pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The DAO. Washington, D.C.
  31. Securities and Exchange Commission (2019) Framework for “investment contract” analysis of digital assets. Washington, D.C.
  32. The White House (2025) ‘Fact sheet: President Donald J. Trump signs GENIUS Act into law’, 18 July. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/07/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-signs-genius-act-into-law/ (Accessed: 15 January 2026).
  33. Uniform Law Commission (2022) Overview of 2022 amendments to the Uniform Commercial Code—emerging technologies. Chicago.
  34. ‘United States v. Sterlingov’ (2024) No. 21-cr-00399 (D.D.C.).
  35. ‘United States v. Ulbricht’ (2014) 31 F. Supp. 3d 540 (S.D.N.Y.).
  36. U.S. Department of the Treasury (2023) Illicit finance risk assessment of decentralized finance. Washington, D.C.
  37. U.S. Department of the Treasury (2025) Report to the Secretary of the Treasury from the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets. Washington, D.C.
  38. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2025) SEC announces joint stipulation to dismiss appeals, resolving civil enforcement action against Ripple and two of its executives. Litigation Release No. 26369. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26369 (Accessed: 11 January 2026).
  39. Werbach, K. (2023) ‘Digital asset regulation: peering into the past, peering into the future’, William & Mary Law Review, 64(4), pp. 1251–1307.
  40. Werbach, K. and Cornell, N. (2017) ‘Contracts ex machina’, Duke Law Journal, 67(2), pp. 313–382.
  41. Wyoming Legislature (2019) Digital Assets Act. Wyo. Stat. §34-29-101 et seq. State of Wyoming.
  42. Wyoming Legislature (2021) Decentralized autonomous organization supplement. Wyo. Stat. §17-31-101 et seq. State of Wyoming.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2026-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 175 - 199
Published on: Jun 28, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Lilla Nóra Kiss, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.