References
- Almada, M. (2025) ‘The EU AI Act in a global perspective’, in M. Furendal and M. Lundgren (eds) Handbook on the global governance of AI. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5083993
- Banerjee, S. (2008) ‘Corporate social responsibility: the good, the bad and the ugly’, Critical Sociology, 34(1), pp. 51–79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623
- Barfield, W. and Pagallo, U. (2025) Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence: current and future directions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035316496
- Baur, D. (2019) ‘Why AI really needs social scientists’, Medium, 15 March. Available at: https://dorotheabaur.medium.com/why-ai-really-needs-social-scientists-51f5d11cc227 (Accessed: 22 November 2021).
- Blackman, R. and Ammanath, B. (2022) ‘Building transparency into AI projects’, Harvard Business Review, 20 June. Available at: https://hbr.org/2022/06/building-transparency-into-ai-projects (Accessed: 13 May 2023).
- Bowen, G.A. (2009) ‘Document analysis as a qualitative research method’, Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), pp. 27–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
- Brown, R.D. (2018) ‘Towards a Qatar cybersecurity capability maturity model with a legislative framework’, International Review of Law, 2018(4), pp. 9–44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29117/irl.2018.0036
- Brown, R., Truby, J. and Ibrahim, I.A. (2022) ‘Mending lacunas in the EU’s GDPR and proposed artificial intelligence regulation’, European Studies, 9(1), pp. 61–90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/eustu-2022-0003
- Butt, J.S. (2024) ‘Analytical study of the world’s first EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act’, International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(3), pp. 7343–7364. Available at: https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0324.0914
- Buyya, R., Vecchiola, C. and Selvi, S.T. (2013) ‘Advanced topics in cloud computing’, in R. Buyya, C. Vecchiola and S.T. Selvi (eds) Mastering cloud computing: technologies and applications programming. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman, pp. 373–427.
- Campos, R. (2025) ‘A necessary cognitive turn in digital constitutionalism: regulated self-regulation as a regulatory mechanism for artificial intelligence (AI) in comparative law’, in Digital constitutionalism. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, pp. 113–136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748938644-113
- Carroll, A.B. (1991) ‘The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders’, Business Horizons, 34(4), pp. 39–48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
- Citron, D. and Pasquale, F. (2014) ‘The scored society: due process for automated predictions’, Washington Law Review, 89, pp. 1–33.
- Crane, A., Matten, D., McWilliams, A.M., Moon, J. Siegel, D.S. (2008) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.001.0001
- Crawford, K. and Schultz, J. (2014) ‘Big data and due process: toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms’, Boston College Law Review, 55(1), pp. 93–128.
- Crowther, D. and Aras, G. (2008) Corporate social responsibility. Bookboon.
- Dahlsrud, A. (2006) ‘How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), pp. 1–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132
- De Almeida, P.G.R., Dos Santos, C.D. and Farias, J.S. (2021) ‘Artificial intelligence regulation: a framework for governance’, Ethics and Information Technology, 23(3), pp. 505–525. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09593-z
- De Laat, P.B. (2021) ‘Companies committed to responsible AI: from principles towards implementation and regulation’, Philosophy & Technology, 34, pp. 1135–1193. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00474-3
- Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., De Prado, M. L., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Herrera, F. (2023) ‘Connecting the dots in trustworthy artificial intelligence: from AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation’, Information Fusion, 99, article 101896. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896
- ‘Directive (EU) 2024/2853 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on liability for defective products and repealing Council Directive 85/374/EEC’ (2024) Official Journal L 2024/2853, 18.11.2024. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/2853/oj (Accessed: 13 May 2023).
- Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. and Sen, S. (2010) ‘Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), pp. 8–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
- Du, S. and Sen, S. (2023) ‘AI through a CSR lens: consumer issues and public policy’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 42(4), pp. 351–353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156231186573
- Dundua, E. (2025) ‘Corporate ethics in the AI era: balancing technological advancement with social responsibility’, in R.C. Geibel and S. Machavariani (eds) Digital management and artificial intelligence. ISPC 2024. Springer proceedings in business and economics. Cham: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88052-0_21
- Durmus, M. (2023) ‘An overview of some ethical-AI toolkits’, AIOSMA. Available at: https://www.aisoma.de/an-overview-of-some-ethical-ai-toolkits/?amp=1 (Accessed: 13 May 2023).
- European Commission (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Independent European High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai (Accessed: 8 April 2025).
- ‘European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies. Ethical aspects framework’ (2020) 2020/2012(INL). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0275_EN.html (Accessed: 8 April 2025).
- Ferrell, O.C. and Ferrell, L. (2024) ‘Building a better world: the role of AI ethics and social responsibility’, Journal of Macromarketing, 44(4), pp. 928–935. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467241285793
- Fraser, H. and Bello y Villarino, J. (2024) ‘Acceptable risks in Europe’s proposed AI Act: reasonableness and other principles for deciding how much risk management is enough’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 15(2), pp. 431–446. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.57
- Friedman, M. (1970) ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’, The New York Times Magazine, 13 September. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html (Accessed: 9 October 2021).
- Garriga, E. and Melé, D. (2004) ‘Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory’, Journal of Business Ethics, 53, pp. 51–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
- Gunningham, N., Kagan, R.A. and Thornton, D. (2004) ‘Social license and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance’, Law & Social Inquiry, 29(2), pp. 307–341. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2004.tb00338.x
- Gutierrez, C.I. and Marchant, G. (2021) ‘How soft law is used in AI governance’, Brookings, 27 May. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-soft-law-is-used-in-ai-governance/ (Accessed: 21 July 2025).
- Hacker, P. (2023) ‘The European AI liability directives–critique of a half-hearted approach and lessons for the future’, Computer Law & Security Review, 51, article 105871. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105871
- Hawken, P. (1993) The ecology of commerce: a declaration of sustainability. New York: Harper Business.
- Hoffmann-Riem, W. (2020) ‘Artificial intelligence as a challenge for law and regulation’, in T. Wischmeyer and T. Rademacher (eds) Regulating artificial intelligence. Cham: Springer, pp. 1–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32361-5_1
- Huising, R. and Silbey, S. (2021) ‘Accountability infrastructures: pragmatic compliance inside organizations’, Regulation & Governance, 15(S1), pp. S40–S62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12419
- Kashefi, P., Kashefi, Y. and Ghafouri Mirsaraei, A. (2024) ‘Shaping the future of AI: balancing innovation and ethics in global regulation’, Uniform Law Review, 29(3), pp. 524–548. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unae040
- Katamba, D., Zipfel, C., Haag, D. and Tushabomwe-Kazooba, C. (eds) (2012) Principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Houston, TX: Strategic Book Publishing and Rights Co.
- Khan, A.N., Mehmood, K. and Ali, A. (2024) ‘Maximizing CSR impact: leveraging artificial intelligence and process optimization for sustainability performance management’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), pp. 4849–4861. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2832
- Majeed, N., Hilal, A. and Khan, A.N. (2023) ‘Doctrinal research in law: meaning, scope and methodology’, Bulletin of Business and Economics, 12(4), pp. 559–563. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00167
- Mazzi, F. (2023) ‘Concerted actions to integrate corporate social responsibility with AI in business: two recommendations on leadership and public policy’, in R. Schmidpeter and R. Altenburger (eds) Responsible artificial intelligence: CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Cham: Springer, pp. 251–266. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09245-9_13
- Miller, K. (2023) ‘AI’s ostensible emergent abilities are a mirage’, Human Centered Artificial Intelligence, 8 May. Stanford University. Available at: https://hai.stanford.edu/news/ais-ostensible-emergent-abilities-are-mirage (Accessed: 4 March 2025).
- Mohammed, S. (2020) ‘Components, theories and the business case for corporate social responsibility’, International Journal of Business and Management Review, 8(2), pp. 37–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37745/ijbmr.vol8.no2.p37-65.2020
- Nkonde, M. (2019) ‘Is AI bias a corporate social responsibility issue?’, Harvard Business Review, 4 November. Available at: https://hbr.org/2019/11/is-ai-bias-a-corporate-social-responsibility-issue (Accessed: 21 July 2025).
- Parsons, T. (1961) ‘An outline of the social system’, in T. Parsons, E.A. Shils, K.D. Naegle and J.R. Pitts (eds) Theories of society. New York: Simon & Schuster, The Free Press.
- Pasquale, F. (2015) The black box society: the secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
- Picard, N. and Kosar, J. (2025) ‘AI and transparency: a new age of corporate responsibility’, PwC, 29 May. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/audit-assurance/corporate-reporting/esg-reporting/ai-transparency-and-corporate-responsibility.html (Accessed: 21 July 2025).
- Podile, V., Reddy, K.P., Reddy, V.N.S., Babu, M.S. and Phani, A.K. (2024) ‘Artificial intelligence and corporate social responsibility: synergies, challenges, and future directions’, International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(6), pp. 95–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2024.4.6.3399
- Polishchuk, L. (2009) ‘Corporate social responsibility vs. government regulation: an analysis of institutional choice’, Problems of Economic Transition, 52(8), pp. 73–94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2753/PET1061-1991520805
- Prahalad, C.K. (2002) ‘Strategies for the bottom of the economic pyramid: India as a source of innovation’, Reflections: The SoL Journal, 3(4), pp. 6–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/152417302760127192
- ‘Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence (AI Liability Directive)’ (2022) COM/2022/496 final, 28.9.2022. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52022PC0496 (Accessed: 8 April 2025).
- Raghvendra, Saxena, T., Tripathi, D.R. and Jain, R. (2024) ‘Evaluating the opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence in strategic management and business integration’, International Journal of Innovations in Science, Engineering and Management, pp. 19–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.69968/ijisem.2024v3si219-24
- ‘Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)’ (2016) Official Journal L 119, 4.5.2016, pp. 1–88.
- ‘Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No. 300/2008, (EU) No. 167/2013, (EU) No. 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828’ (2024) Official Journal L 1689, 12.7.2024.
- Renieris, E.M., Kiron, D. and Mills, S. (2022) ‘Should organizations link responsible AI and corporate social responsibility? It’s complicated’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 24 May. Available at: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/should-organizations-link-responsible-ai-and-corporate-social-responsibility-its-complicated/ (Accessed: 21 July 2025).
- Schuett, J. (2024) ‘Risk management in the Artificial Intelligence Act’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 15(2), pp. 367–385. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.1
- Truby, J., Brown, R.D., Ibrahim, I.A. and Parellada, O.C. (2021) ‘A sandbox approach to regulating high-risk artificial intelligence applications’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 13(2), pp. 270–294. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.52
- Wilczek, B., Thäsler-Kordonouri, S. and Eder, M. (2025) ‘Government regulation or industry self-regulation of AI? Investigating the relationships between uncertainty avoidance, people’s AI risk perceptions, and their regulatory preferences in Europe’, AI & Society, 40, pp. 3797–3811. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02138-0
- Wood, D.J. (1991) ‘Corporate social performance revisited’, Academy of Management Review, 16(4), pp. 691–718. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/258977
- Wörsdörfer, M. (2025) ‘The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act: an ordoliberal assessment’, AI and Ethics, 5(1), pp. 263–278. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00337-x
- Zaidan, E. and Ibrahim, I.A. (2024) ‘AI governance in a complex and rapidly changing regulatory landscape: a global perspective’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, article 1121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03560-x
- Zhang, K. and Hao, X. (2024) ‘Corporate social responsibility as the pathway towards sustainability: a state-of-the-art review in Asia economics’, Discover Sustainability, 5(1), article 348. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00577-9