Abstract
European legal education is undergoing a rapid transformation, driven by the need to prepare lawyers for a globalized and digital society. This study critically examines how the core elements of the European legal education paradigm— technological integration, practical skills development and internationalization—can be realistically adapted in Georgian law faculties.
The Bologna Process promotes harmonization of higher legal education standards, interdisciplinary approaches and the development of critical and analytical skills. Equally important is the integration of practical skills and technological competencies through innovative teaching methods such as case analyses, simulations and problem-based learning. The research analyzes how these methods, alongside increased internationalization and collaboration with European universities, contribute to modernizing legal education in Georgia.
The study sets out three specific objectives: to analyze the implementation of European educational models in Georgian universities, to assess the technological capacity and practical readiness of Georgian law faculties and to develop targeted recommendations based on empirical findings within the Georgian context.
The analysis draws on recent academic sources and practical examples, ensuring that the recommendations are grounded in the realities of Georgian higher education. The findings demonstrate that while the formal adoption of European standards is underway, significant gaps remain in practical training, technological infrastructure and institutional collaboration. The proposed recommendations directly address these gaps, providing actionable steps for policymakers and educators to enhance both the quality and relevance of legal education in Georgia.
Modern higher education must adapt to technological advances, using contemporary methods to prepare youth for the current labor market. Integrating multidisciplinary components (economics, medicine and technology) alongside professional expertise cultivates versatile skills that are resistant to technological replacement. A lawyer with diverse abilities is less likely to be automated out of practice. To explore these aspects, this article employs normative, dogmatic, analytical, synthetic and general sociological methods.