Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Legal design and access to justice: a case study on child support payments in Chile Cover

Legal design and access to justice: a case study on child support payments in Chile

Open Access
|Apr 2025

References

  1. Ausín, V., Abella, V., Delgado, V. and Hortigûela, D. (2016) ‘Aprendizaje basado en proyectos a través de las TIC. Una experiencia de innovación docente desde las aulas universitarias’, Formación Universitaria, 9(3), pp. 31–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062016000300005
  2. Barnes, B.K. (2019) Building better ideas: how constructive debate inspires courage, collaboration, and breakthrough solutions. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  3. Bernal, D.W. and Hagan, M.D. (2020) ‘Redesigning justice innovation: a standardized methodology’, Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 16(2), pp. 335–384.
  4. Biard, A., Hoevenaars, J., Kramer, X. and Themeli, E. (2021) ‘Introduction: The future of access to justice—beyond science fiction’, in X. Kramer, A. Biard and J. Hoevenaars (eds) New pathways to civil justice in Europe: challenges of access to justice. Springer, pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66637-8_1
  5. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional (2021) ‘Historia de la Ley Nº 21.389. Crea el Registro Nacional de Deudores de Pensiones de Alimentos y modifica diversos cuerpos legales para perfeccionar el sistema de pago de las pensiones de alimentos.’ Available at: https://www.bcn.cl/historiadelaley/nc/historia-de-la-ley/7931/ (Accessed: 27 September 2024).
  6. Brown, T. (2009) Change by design: how design thinking creates new alternatives for business and society. Harper Business.
  7. Burnett, M. and Sandefur, R.L. (2024) ‘A people-centered approach to designing and evaluating community justice worker programs in the United States’, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 51(5), pp. 1509–1551. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4946163
  8. Cappelletti, M. and Garth, B.G. (1978) ‘Access to justice: the newest wave in the worldwide movement to make rights effective’ Buffalo Law Review, 27(2), pp. 181–292. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol27/iss2/1 (Accessed: 27 September 2024).
  9. Carpenter, A. (2020) ‘Developing “NextGen” lawyers through project-based learning’, in C. Denvir (ed) Modernising legal education. Cambridge University Press, pp. 126–146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663311.009
  10. Christensen, C.M., Dillon, K., Hall, T. and Duncan, D.S. (2016) Competing against luck: the story of innovation and customer choice. Harper Business.
  11. De Souza, S. and Spohr, M. (2021) Technology, innovation and access to justice: dialogues on the future of law. Edinburgh University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474473880
  12. Doherty, M., Corrales Compagnucci, M., Haapio, H. and Hagan, M. (2021) ‘A new attitude to law’s empire: the potentialities of legal design’, in M. Corrales Compagnucci, H. Haapio, M. Hagan and M. Doherty (eds) Legal design: integrating business, design and legal thinking with technology. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107269.00008
  13. Durham, C. (2022) ‘A great experiment: state supreme courts, regulatory reform in the legal profession, and access to justice’, Rutgers University Law Review, 74(4), pp. 1393–1403.
  14. Escudero Moreno, M.J. (2024) ‘Más del 80% de hombres demandados no paga su pensión de alimentos’, La Tercera, 13 June. Available at: https://www.latercera.com/que-pasa/noticia/mas-del-80-de-hombres-demandados-no-pagasu-pension-de-alimentos/AKS5GJUBZVBQHCX63L4MK7ZHBA/# (Accessed: September 2024).
  15. Guaman-Quintanilla, S., Everaert, P., Chiluiza, K. and Valcke, M. (2023) ‘Impact of design thinking in higher education: a multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), pp. 217–240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09724-z
  16. Haapio, H., Barton, T.D. and Corrales Compagnucci, M. (2021) ‘Legal design for the common good: proactive legal care by design’, in M. Corrales Compagnucci, H. Haapio, M. Hagan and M. Doherty (eds) Legal design: integrating business, design and legal thinking with technology. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 56–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107269.00011
  17. Hagan, M. (2018) ‘A human-centered design approach to access to justice: generating new prototypes and hypotheses for intervention to make courts user-friendly’, Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality, 6(2), pp. 199–239.
  18. Hagan, M. (2020a) ‘Legal design as a thing: a theory of change and a set of methods to craft a human-centered legal system’, Design Issues, 36(3), pp. 3–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00600
  19. Hagan, M. (2020b) ‘Design comes to the law school’, in C. Denvir (ed) Modernising legal education. Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–125. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663311.008
  20. Krug, S. (2014) Don’t make me think: a common sense approach to web usability. New Riders.
  21. Lillo, R. (2022) Understanding due process in non-criminal matters: how to harmonize procedural guarantees with the right to access to justice. Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95534-2
  22. Lillo, R. (2023) ‘ICTs in the Chilean and Latin-American civil justice: analysis from the right of access to justice’, Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 64(3), pp. 336–362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2023.00471
  23. Lillo, R. and Vargas, M. (2021) ‘Acceso a la justicia civil y la pandemia de Covid-19’, in F. Vargas (ed) Informe anual sobre derechos humanos en Chile 2021. Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales, pp. 177–228.
  24. Lupica, L.R. and Grant, G. (2021) ‘Will human-centered legal design improve civil justice systems? And how will we ever know?’ in R. Ducato and A. Strowel (eds) Legal design perspectives: theoretical and practical insights from the field. Ledizioni, pp. 117–138. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5710846
  25. Malhotra, N.K. (2010) Marketing research: an applied orientation. Pearson Education.
  26. Moreno Rojas, C.J. (2022) ‘¿Por qué los abogados somos como somos? Un análisis del comportamiento social de los abogados desde el derecho, la sociología y la educación jurídica’, Revista Pedagogía Universitaria y Didáctica del Derecho, 9(2), pp. 153–166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5885.2022.65254
  27. Osborn, A. (1953) Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  28. Pleasence, P. and Balmer, N.J. (2012) ‘Caught in the middle: justiciable problems and the use of lawyers’, in M. Trebilcock, A. Duggan and L. Sossin (eds) Middle income access to justice. University of Toronto Press, pp. 27–54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442660601-004
  29. ‘Poder Judicial en números’ (no date) Poder Judicial Republica de Chile. Available at: https://numeros.pjud.cl/Inicio (Accessed: 27 December 2024).
  30. Pohjonen, S. (2006) ‘Proactive law in the field of law’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 53–70. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-4.pdf (Accessed: 24 September 2024)
  31. Saldaña, J. (2016) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications.
  32. Sandefur, R.L., Clarke, T.M. and Teufel, J. (2021) ‘Seconds to impact? Regulatory reform, new kinds of legal services, and increased access to justice’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 84, pp. 69–80.
  33. Solarte-Vásquez, M.C. and Hietanen-Kunwald, P. (2020) ‘Transaction design standards for the operationalisation of fairness and empowerment in proactive contracting’, International and Comparative Law Review, 20(1), pp. 180–200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-0008
  34. Trámite Fácil (no date) [Homepage]. Available at: https://ojv.pjud.cl/kpitec-ojv-web/tramite_facil (Accessed: 27 December 2024).
  35. Trujillo-Cristoffanini, M. and Araya-Concha, A. (2023) ‘No pago de pensiones de alimentos como violencia económica: análisis de género de la experiencia de mujeres chilenas’, Universum, 38(2), pp. 617–637. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-23762023000200617
  36. Vargas Pavez, M. and Pérez Ahumada, P. (2021) ‘Pensiones de alimentos. Algunas razones para explicar el fenómeno del incumplimiento’, Revista de Derecho Universidad de Concepción, 89(250), pp. 219–258. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29393/RD250-6PAMP20006
  37. Young, K.M. (2021) ‘What the access to justice crisis means for legal education’, U.C. Irvine Law Review, 11(3), pp. 811–850.
  38. Zuckerman, A. (1999) ‘Justice in crisis: comparative dimensions of civil procedure’, in A. Zuckerman (ed) Civil justice in crisis: comparative perspectives of civil procedure. Oxford University Press, pp. 3–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298335.003.0001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2025-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 282 - 308
Published on: Apr 2, 2025
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Ricardo Lillo, Patricia Acevedo, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.