Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Judicial Administration 4.0: strengths, challenges and opportunities of a proactive approach to AI regulation in Spain Cover

Judicial Administration 4.0: strengths, challenges and opportunities of a proactive approach to AI regulation in Spain

Open Access
|Apr 2025

References

  1. AI Pro (no date) ‘Empieza a usar Stable Diffusion’. Available at: https://ai-pro.org/start-stable-diffusion/?locales=es&keyword=stable%20diffusion&adid=722034597758&ppg=05&pmt=paydl&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAiA34S7BhAtEiwACZzv4UHjNll4QJHAPcr7UWh5jY5ZJ4mKIzKQta9xbIhboaKDK0nyUbZ6-hoCtyYQAvD_BwE (Accessed: 15 December 202).
  2. Alemán Aróstegui, L. (2023) ‘El uso de RISCANVI en la toma de decisiones penitenciarias’, Estudios Penales y Criminológicos, 44(ext). Available at: https://doi.org/10.15304/epc.44.8884
  3. Alpaydin, E. (2014) Introduction to machine learning. 3rd edn. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  4. Armenta Deu, T. (2021) Derivas de la justicia. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
  5. Barona Vilar, S. (2023) ‘Algoritmización de la prueba y la decisión judicial en el proceso penal ¿utopía o distopía?’, in C. Arangüena Fanego, M. de Hoyos Sancho, E. Pillado González, P.M. Freitas and F. Jiménez-Villarejo Fernández (eds) El proceso penal ante una nueva realidad tecnológica europea. Navarra: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, pp. 133–161.
  6. Belda Esplugues, E. (2023) ‘La transformación digital en el ministerio del interior. Retos de futuro. El centro tecnológico de seguridad (CETSE)’, Revista Científica del Centro Universitario de la Guardia Civil, (1), pp. 13–34.
  7. Berger-Walliser, G. (2012) ‘The past and future of proactive law: an overview of the development of the proactive law movement’, in G. Berger-Walliser and K. Østergaard (eds) Proactive law in a business environment. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, pp. 13–31. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2576761 (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  8. Bobadilla, J. (2020) Machine learning y deep learning: Usando Python, Scikit y Keras. Bogotá: Ediciones de la U. Available at: https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=iAAyEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA11&dq=concepto+de+machine+learning&ots=Qiw2w2pH2t&sig=RhJ17iFOO_p0bvttpUELVMLwRE#v=onepage&q=concepto%20de%20machine%20learning&f=false (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  9. Borges Blázquez, R. (2021) Inteligencia artificial y proceso penal. Navarra: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.
  10. Boulgouris, N.V., Plataniotis, K.N. and Micheli-Tzanakou, E. (2010) Biometrics: theory, methods, and applications. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE and Wiley. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.61967
  11. Brown, L.M. (1951) ‘The practice of preventive law’, Journal of the American Judicature Society, 35, p. 45.
  12. Browning, J. and LeCun, Y. (2023) ‘Language, common sense, and the Winograd schema challenge’, Artificial Intelligence, article 10403. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.104031
  13. Calderon-Valencia, F., Perez-Montoya, J.J. and de Morais, F. S. (2021) ‘AI systems in Brazilian Supreme Federal Court and the Colombian Constitutional Court experiences: prospective analysis’, Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes, 13(1). Available at: https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA668279270&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=19849729&p=IFME&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E3e0b01c&aty=open-web-entry (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  14. Cantero Gamito, M. and Gentile, G. (2023) Algorithms, rule of law, and the future of justice: implications in the Estonian justice system, EUI, STG, Policy Brief, 2023/27. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75916 (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  15. Casar Corredera, J.R. (2023) ‘Inteligencia artificial generativa’, Anales de la Real Academia de Doctores de España, 8(3), pp. 475–489.
  16. ChatGTP (no date) [Home page]. Available at: https://chatgpt.com/ (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  17. Clearview AI (no date) [Home page]. Available at: https://www.clearview.ai (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  18. Cortés Gómez, I. and Santiago Romero, E.F. (2023) ‘Respuesta del gobierno (184) Pregunta escrita Congreso’, 184/99831, 10 January. Available at: https://www.congreso.es/entradap/l14p/e25/e_0255721_n_000.pdf (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  19. Corvalán, J.G. (2017) ‘La primera inteligencia artificial predictiva al servicio de la Justicia: Prometea’, LA LEY, 29 September. Available at: https://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2019/06/doctrina47747.pdf (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  20. Corvalán, J.G. (2018) ‘Inteligencia artificial: retos, desafíos y oportunidades – Prometea: la primera inteligencia artificial de Latinoamérica al servicio de la Justicia’, Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 5(1), pp. 295–316. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v5i1.55334
  21. Corvalán, J. G. (2020) ‘Inteligencia artificial GPT-3, Pretoria y oráculos algorítmicos en el derecho: GPT-3 artificial intelligence, Pretoria, and algorithmic oracles in law’, International Journal of Digital Law, 1(1), pp. 11–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47975/IJDL/1corvalan
  22. Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (2023) ‘Artificial intelligence (AI) – Judicial guidance’, 12 December. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/artificial-intelligence-ai-judicial-guidance/ (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  23. De Hoyos Sancho, M. (2020) ‘El libro blanco sobre inteligencia artificial de la Comisión Europea: reflexiones desde las garantías esenciales del proceso penal como “sector de riesgo”’, Revista Española de Derecho Europeo, (76), pp. 9–44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37417/REDE/num76_2020_534
  24. Doroudi, S. (2023) ‘The intertwined histories of artificial intelligence and education’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(4), pp. 885–928. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00313-2
  25. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2021) Getting the future right: artificial intelligence and fundamental rights. Summary. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2021-artificial-intelligence-summary_en.pdf (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  26. Fabri, M. (2024) ‘From court automation to e-justice and beyond in Europe’, International Journal for Court Administration, 15(3), article 7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.640
  27. Fariña, F., Arce, R. and Novo, M. (2002) ‘Heurístico de anclaje en las decisiones judiciales’, Psicothema, 14(1), pp. 39–46. Available at: https://www.psicothema.com/pi?pii=684 (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  28. Fernández, Y. (2024) ‘DALL-E: Qué es, cómo funciona y cómo puedes utilizar esta inteligencia artificial para crear imágenes’, Xataka Basics, 15 November. Available at: https://www.xataka.com/basics/dall-e-que-como-funciona-comopuedes-utilizar-esta-inteligencia-artificial-para-crear-imagenes (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  29. Fondos Europeos (2023) ‘73_2023_SGSICS_Sistema Automático de Identificación Dactilar SAID – ABIS’. Available at: https://fondoseuropeosparaseguridad.interior.gob.es/es/detalle/proyecto/SISTEMA-AUTOMATICO-DEIDENTIFICACION-DACTILAR-SAID-ABIS (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  30. Foster, D. (2023) Generative deep learning: teaching machines to paint, write, compose, and play. 2nd edn. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
  31. General Secretariat of the State Technical Committee for Electronic Judicial Administration (2024) Ministerio de la Presidencia, Justicia y Relaciones para las Cortes. Available at: https://www.administraciondejusticia.gob.es/cteaje/normativacomplementaria (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  32. González, F. (2010) ‘Gestión de información en los servicios de seguridad’, DINTEL Alta Dirección, 12, pp. 146–149.
  33. González, J.L. and Garrido, M.J. (2015) ‘Gender-based violence victims’ satisfaction with police performance in Spain: validation of VioGen system’, Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 25(1), pp. 29–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apj.2015.02.003
  34. González-Álvarez, J.L., Hermoso, J.S. and Camacho-Collados, M. (2020) ‘Policía predictiva en España: Aplicación y retos futuros’, Behavior & Law Journal, 6(1), pp. 26–41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47442/blj.v6.i1.75
  35. Gutiérrez, J.D. (2024) UNESCO Global Judges’ Initiative: survey on the use of AI systems by judicial operators. Paris: UNESCO.
  36. Hildebrandt, M. (2010) ‘Proactive forensic profiling: proactive criminalization’, in R.A. Duff et al. (eds) The boundaries of the criminal law. Oxford Academic, pp. 113–137. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600557.003.0005
  37. Judicial Ethics Commission (2024) ‘Dictámenes de la Comisión de Ética Judicial (2018–2023)’, Comisión de Ética Judicial, 22 October. Available at: https://www.poderjudicial.es/cgpj/es/Temas/Etica-Judicial/Comision-de-Etica-Judicial/Documentos-de-interes/Recopilacion-de-dictamenes-y-acuerdos/ (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  38. Kingma, D.P. and Welling, M. (2018) Auto-encoding variational Bayes. Available at: https://www.ee.bgu.ac.il/~rrtammy/DNN/StudentPresentations/2018/AUTOEN~2.PDF (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  39. Kurzweil, R. (1990) The age of intelligent machines. 1st edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  40. Law 1/2000 on Civil Procedure (Spain) (2000) BOE-A-2000-323, 7 January. Available at: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2000/01/07/1 (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  41. Li, Z. (2024) ‘Ethical frontiers in artificial intelligence: navigating the complexities of bias, privacy, and accountability’, International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 14(3), pp. 109–116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12792741
  42. Limantė, A. (2024) ‘Bias in facial recognition technologies used by law enforcement: understanding the causes and searching for a way out’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 42(2), pp. 115–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2023.2277581
  43. Llorente Sánchez-Arjona, M. (2022) ‘Inteligencia artificial, valoración del riesgo y derecho al debido proceso’, in S. Calaza López and M. Llorente Sánchez-Arjona (eds) Inteligencia artificial legal y administración de justicia. Navarra: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, pp. 371–396.
  44. Luger, G.F. (2008) Artificial intelligence: structures and strategies for complex problem solving. London: Pearson.
  45. Martinho, A. (2024) ‘Surveying judges about artificial intelligence: profession, judicial adjudication, and legal principles’, AI & Society, pp. 1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01869-4
  46. McCarthy, J. (1956) ‘What is artificial intelligence?’. Available at: https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.pdf (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  47. McCarthy, J., Minsky, M.L., Rochester, N. and Shannon, C.E. (2006) ‘A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence’, AI Magazine, 27(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904
  48. Ministerio del Interior (no date) ‘Sistema VioGén’. Available at: https://www.interior.gob.es/opencms/ca/servicios-al-ciudadano/violencia-contra-la-mujer/sistemaviogen/ (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  49. Montesinos García, A. (2022) ‘Justicia penal predictiva’, in S. Barona Vilar (ed) Justicia poliédrica en tiempos de mudanza. Tirant lo Blanch, pp. 425–454.
  50. Morison, J. and Harkens, A. (2019) ‘Re-engineering justice? Robot judges, computerised courts and (semi) automated legal decision-making’, Legal Studies, 39(4), pp. 618–635. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.5
  51. Negnevitsky, M. (2011) Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems. 3rd edn. Harlow: Addison Wesley.
  52. OSCE (2017) OSCE guidebook: intelligence-led policing (TNTD/SPMU Publication Series Vol. 13). Vienna: OSCE. Available at: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/d/3/327476.pdf (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  53. Oswalda, M., Grace, J., Urwin, S. and Barnes, G.C. (2018) ‘Algorithmic risk assessment policing models: lessons from the Durham HART model and “experimental” proportionality’, Information & Communications Technology Law, 27(2), pp. 223–250. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2018.1458455
  54. Pagallo, U. and Durante, M. (2016) ‘The pros and cons of legal automation and its governance’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(2), pp. 323–334. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00005742
  55. Pascual, M.G. (2024) ‘La Policía española ya usa en sus investigaciones un sistema automático de reconocimiento facial’, El País, 28 May. Available at: https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2024-05-28/la-policia-espanola-ya-usa-en-susinvestigacionesun-sistema-automatico-de-reconocimiento-facial.html (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  56. Perry, W.L., McInnis, B., Price, C.C., Smith, S. and Hollywood, J.S. (2013) Predictive policing: the role of crime forecasting in law enforcement operations. RAND Corporation. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR233
  57. Pohjonen, S. (2006) ‘Proactive law in the field of law: a proactive approach’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 54–70. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-4.pdf (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
  58. Poole, D.L., and Mackworth, A.K. (2017) Artificial intelligence: foundations of computational agents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108164085
  59. Portal ERP (2024) ‘IDC: “Los datos digitales alcanzarán los 175 Zettabytes para 2025”’, 11 January. Available at: https://portalerp.com.co/idc-los-datosdigitales-alcanzaran-los-175-zettabytes-para-2025 (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  60. Raschka, S. and Mirjalili, V. (2019) Python machine learning. 3rd edn. Packt.
  61. ‘Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending various regulations (Artificial Intelligence Act)’ (2024) Official Journal L 2024/1689, 12 July, pp. 1–144.
  62. ‘Resolution 80/2023’ (2023) Sentencia 80/2023, de 3 de julio. Tribunal Constitucional de España, BOE núm. 184, 03 August. Available at: https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/es-ES/Resolucion/Show/29590 (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  63. ‘Resolution 95/2021’ (2021) Sentencia 95/2021, de 10 de mayo. Tribunal Constitucional de España, BOE núm. 142, 15 June. Available at: https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/es-ES/Resolucion/Show/26718 (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  64. Riedl, M.O. (2014) ‘The Lovelace 2.0 test of artificial creativity and intelligence’, ArXiv, article 1410.6142. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6142 (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  65. ‘Royal Decree-Law 6/2023’ (2023) ‘Real Decreto-ley 6/2023, de 19 de diciembre, por el que se aprueban medidas urgentes para la ejecución del Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia’. Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado, BOE-A-2023-25758, 20 December. Available at: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rdl/2023/12/19/6 (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  66. Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (2021) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. 4th edn. London: Pearson.
  67. Sadurní, J. M. (2024) ‘Alan Turing, el arma secreta de los aliados’, National Geographic, 17 June. Available at: https://historia.nationalgeographic.com.es/a/alan-turing-arma-secreta-aliados_16352 (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  68. Salas, J. (2018) ‘Google arregla su algoritmo ‘racista’ borrando a los gorilas’, El País, 15 January. Available at: https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2018/01/14/actualidad/1515955554_803955.html (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  69. Salmi-Tolonen, T. (2011) ‘Proactive law and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms’, in K. Sorsa (ed) Proactive management and proactive business law: a handbook, Turku University of Applied Sciences, pp. 85–100.
  70. Schartum, D.W. (2006) ‘Introduction to a government-based perspective on proactive law: a proactive approach’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 35–51. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-4.pdf (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
  71. Simón Castellano, P. (2021) ‘Inteligencia artificial y Administración de Justicia:¿ Quo vadis, justitia?’ IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, (33). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7238/idp.v0i33.373817
  72. Statistics Easily (no date) ‘What is variational autoencoder VAE?’ Available at https://es.statisticseasily.com/glossario/what-is-variational-autoencodervae/#google_vignette (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  73. Sunil, M. (2024) ‘Generación de imágenes con IA con DALL-E vs Gemini vs Stable Diffusion’, Webline India, 18 December. Available at: https://www.weblineindia.com/es/blog/ai-image-generation-dalle-vs-gemini-vs-stable-diffusion/ (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  74. Tomaževič, N., Ravšelj, D. and Aristovnik, A. (eds) (2023) Artificial intelligence for human-centric society: the future is here. Available at: https://liberalforum.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Artificial-Intelligence-for-human-centric-society.pdf (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  75. Turing, A.M. (1980) ‘Computing machinery and intelligence’, Creative Computing, 6(1), pp. 44–53.
  76. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) ‘Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases’, Science, 185(4157), pp. 1124–1131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  77. Universidad Complutense Madrid (2018) ‘Veripol, inteligencia artificial a la caza de denuncias falsas’, 18 September. Available at: https://www.ucm.es/otri/veripolinteligencia-artificial-a-la-caza-de-denuncias-falsas (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  78. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N. and Polosukhin, I. (2017) ‘Attention is all you need’, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, pp. 5998–6008.
  79. Warwick, K. and Shah, H. (2015) ‘Can machines think? A report on Turing test experiments at the Royal Society’, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 28(6), pp. 989–1007. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2015.1055826
  80. Weisburd, D., Braga, A.A. and Majmundar, M. (2023) ‘What do we know about proactive policing’s effects on crime and community?’, in D. Weisburd, T. Jonathan-Zamir, G. Perry and B. Hasisi (eds) The Future of Evidence-Based Policing. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1079–1112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108885737.008
  81. Weisburd, D. and Majmundar, M.K. (eds) (2018) Proactive policing: effects on crime and communities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17226/24928
  82. Williams, G. (1953) ‘Preventive justice and the rule of law’, Modern Law Review, 16(4), pp. 417–427. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1953.tb02131.x
  83. Zins, C. (2007) ‘Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge,’ Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 58(4), pp. 479–493. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20508
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2025-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 106 - 134
Published on: Apr 2, 2025
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 María Luisa García Torres, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.