Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Balancing risk and social good: proactive law as a strategy in AI governance Cover

Balancing risk and social good: proactive law as a strategy in AI governance

By: Renátó Vági  
Open Access
|Apr 2025

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. (2021) ‘Remaking the post-COVID world’, Finance & Development. International Monetary Fund. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2021/03/COVID-inequality-and-automation-acemoglu.htm (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  2. Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2019 (2019) [Online]. H.R.2231, 116th Congress (2019–2020). Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2231/all-info (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  3. Allen, H.J. (2019) ‘Regulatory sandboxes’, The George Washington Law Review, 87(3), pp. 579–600. Available at: https://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/87-Geo.-Wash.-L.-Rev.-579.pdf (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  4. Andrade, A.C.C. and Solarte-Vásquez, M.C. (2024) ‘The compatibility between SDGs and the EU regulatory framework of AI’, Journal of Ethics and Legal Technologies, 6(1), pp. 11–144.
  5. Antonov, A. (2022) ‘Managing complexity: the EU’s contribution to artificial intelligence governance’, Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, (131), pp. 41–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2022.131.2.41/en
  6. Berger-Walliser, G. (2012) ‘The past and future of proactive law: an overview of the development of the proactive law movement’, in G. Berger-Walliser and K. Østergaard (eds) Proactive law in a business environment. DJØF Publishing, pp. 13–31.
  7. Brown, L.M. (1956) ‘The law office—a preventive law laboratory’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 104(7), pp. 940–953. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3310432
  8. Burri, T. (2022) ‘The new regulation of the European Union on artificial intelligence: fuzzy ethics diffuse into domestic law and sideline international law’, in S. Voeneky, P. Kellmeyer, O. Mueller and W. Burgard (eds) The Cambridge handbook of responsible artificial intelligence: interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009207898.010
  9. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (2024) ‘AI governance research’, 7 October. Available at: https://www.openphilanthropy.org/grants/carnegie-endowment-for-international-peace-ai-governance-research/ (Accessed: 16 November 2024).
  10. Chun, J., de Witt, C.S., and Elkins, K. (2024) ‘Comparative global AI regulation: policy perspectives from the EU, China, and the US’, ArXiv, article 2410.21279. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.21279
  11. ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The European Green Deal’, (COM/2019/640 final)’ (2019) 11 December. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=CELEX%3A52019DC0640 (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  12. Corrales Compagnucci, M., Haapio, H., and Fenwick, M. (eds) (2022) Research handbook on contract design. Edward Elgar Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839102288
  13. Dignum, V. (2019) Responsible artificial intelligence: how to develop and use AI in a responsible way. Springer International Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30371-6
  14. Ebers, M. (2024) ‘Truly risk-based regulation of artificial intelligence: how to implement the EU’s AI Act’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.78 (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  15. Ebers, M., Hoch, V.R.S., Rosenkranz, F., Ruschemeier, H., and Steinrötter, B. (2021) ‘The European Commission’s proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act—a critical assessment by members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS)’, J, 4(4), pp. 589–603. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/j4040043
  16. ‘Executive order on maintaining American leadership in artificial intelligence’ (2019) The White House, 11 February. Available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-maintaining-american-leadership-artificial-intelligence/ (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  17. ‘Executive order on the safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence’ (2023) The White House, 30 October. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/ (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  18. Felzmann, H., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C. and Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2020) ‘Towards transparency by design for artificial intelligence’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), pp. 3333–3361. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00276-4
  19. Flückiger, A. (2016) ‘The ambiguous principle of the clarity of law’, in A. Wagner and S. Cacciaguidi-Fahy (eds) Obscurity and clarity in the law. 2nd edn. Routledge, pp. 31–46.
  20. Fried, B.H. (2003) ‘Ex ante/ex post’, Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues, 13, pp. 123–160. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.390462
  21. Göksal, Ş.İ. and Solarte-Vásquez, M.C. (2024) ‘The blockchain-based trustworthy artificial intelligence supported by stakeholders-in-the-loop model’, Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 32(2), article 2083. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46585/sp32022083
  22. Haapio, H., Barton, T.D. and Compagnucci, M.C. (2021) ‘Legal design for the common good: proactive legal care by design’, in M. Corrales Compagnucci, H. Haapio, M. Hagan and M. Doherty (eds) Legal design: integrating business, design and legal thinking with technology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 56–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107269.00011
  23. Haapio, H. and Varjonen, A. (1998) ‘Quality improvement through proactive contracting: contracts are too important to be left to lawyers!’, ASQ World Conference on Quality and Improvement Proceedings, 52, pp. 243–248.
  24. Häuselmann, A. (2022) ‘Disciplines of AI: an overview of approaches and techniques’, in B. Custers and E. Fosch-Villaronga (eds) Law and artificial intelligence: regulating AI and applying AI in legal practice. The Hague: T.M.C Asser Press, pp. 43–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-523-2_3
  25. High-Level Expert Group on AI (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  26. Hoff, K.A. and Bashir, M. (2015) ‘Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust’, Human Factors, 57(3), pp. 407–434. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
  27. König, P., Wurster, S. and Siewert, M.B. (2022) ‘Regulating for sustainable artificial intelligence: citizens’ support for policy instruments’, SSRN. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4082262 (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  28. Kurzweil, R. (2024) The singularity is nearer: when we merge with AI. Random House.
  29. Lesnes, C. (2024) ‘California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoes AI safety bill’, Le Monde, 30 September. Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2024/09/30/california-governor-gavin-newsom-vetoes-ai-safety-bill_6727751_19.html (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  30. Madiega, T. (2024) ‘Artificial Intelligence Act’, European Parliament Briefing, European Parliament Research Service, PE 698.792. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698792/EPRS_BRI(2021)698792_EN.pdf (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  31. Magnusson Sjöberg, C. (2006) ‘Introduction’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 1–7. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-1.pdf (Accessed: 15 October 2024).
  32. Martínez-Ramil, P., Bolaños-Frasquet, H., Hamuľák, O. and Kerikmäe, T. (2023) ‘A multidimensional understanding of EU’s digital sovereignty’, in D. Ramiro Troitiño, O. Hamuľák and T. Kerikmäe (eds) Digital development of the European Union: an interdisciplinary perspective. Cham: Springer, pp. 235–247. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27312-4_15
  33. Mazzucato, M., Schaake, M., Krier, S. and Entsminger, J. (2022) ‘Governing artificial intelligence in the public interest’, UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Working Paper Series, IIPP WP 2022-12. Available at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2022-12 (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  34. Nguyen, T. (2024) ‘California governor signs bills to protect children from AI deepfake nudes’, AP News, 30 September. Available at: https://apnews.com/article/aideepfakes-children-abuse-7dcf5c566e2a297567f1e148ac2074a4 (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  35. ‘Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘The proactive law approach: a further step towards better regulation at EU level’ (2009), Official Journal C 175/26, 28 July. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2009:175:0026:0033:EN:PDF (Accessed: 13 November 2024). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2009:175:0026:0033:EN:PDF (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  36. Pagallo, U., Ciani Sciolla, J. and Durante, M. (2022) ‘The environmental challenges of AI in EU law: lessons learned from the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) with its drawbacks’, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(3), pp. 359–376. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2021-0121 (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  37. Pohjonen, S. (2006) ‘Proactive law in the field of law: a proactive approach’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 53–70. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-4.pdf (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  38. Prifti, K., Quintavalla, A. and Temperman, J. (2023) ‘Artificial intelligence and human rights: understanding and governing common risks and benefits’, in A. Quintavalla and J. Temperman (eds) Artificial intelligence and human rights. Oxford University Press.
  39. Raposo, V.L. (2022) ‘Ex machina: preliminary critical assessment of the European Draft Act on artificial intelligence’, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 30(1), pp. 88–109. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaac007
  40. ‘Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 June 2021 on establishing the Climate Law (CELEX No. 32021R1119) (2021) EUR-Lex. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=celex:32021R1119 (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  41. ‘Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) no. 300/2008, (EU) no. 167/2013, (EU) no. 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828’ (2024) Official Journal L 2024/1689, 12 July. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689 (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  42. Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act (2023) Senate Bill 1047, 7 February. Available at: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB1047#:~:text=This%20bill%20would%20enact%20the,to%20promptly%20enact%20a%20full (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  43. Schartum, D.W. (2006) ‘Introduction to a government-based perspective on proactive law: a proactive approach’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 35–51. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-3.pdf (Accessed: 15 December 2024).
  44. Schuett, J. (2023) ‘Defining the scope of AI regulations’, Law, Innovation and Technology, 15(1), pp. 60–82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2184135
  45. Smith, N. (2024) ‘Plentiful, high-paying jobs in the age of AI’, Noahpinion, 17 March. Available at: https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/plentiful-high-paying-jobs-in-the (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
  46. Solarte-Vásquez, M.C. and Hietanen-Kunwald, P. (2020) ‘Transaction design standards for the operationalisation of fairness and empowerment in proactive contracting’, International and Comparative Law Review, 20(1), pp. 180–200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-0008
  47. Tyrangiel, J. (2024) ‘I found the smartest politician on AI. It’s no one you’d expect’, The Washington Post, 20 March. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/20/ai-europe-regulation-leading/ (Accessed: 26 November 2024).
  48. Wang, X. and Wu, Y.C. (2024) ‘Balancing innovation and regulation in the age of generative artificial intelligence’, Journal of Information Policy, 14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.14.2024.0012
  49. White, J.B. (2024) ‘Gavin Newsom signs election “deepfake” ban in rebuke to Elon Musk’, Politico, 17 September. Available at: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/17/newsom-signs-election-deepfake-ban-00179557 (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2025-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 58 - 82
Published on: Apr 2, 2025
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Renátó Vági, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.