Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact Evaluation of the Graduate Practice Intervention in Slovakia with the Application of the CART Method Cover

Impact Evaluation of the Graduate Practice Intervention in Slovakia with the Application of the CART Method

Open Access
|May 2023

References

  1. Bánociová, A. & Martinková, S. (2017), ‘Active labour market policies of selected European countries and their competitiveness,’ Journal of Competitiveness, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 5–21. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.03.01
  2. Bazzoli, M.; De Poli, S.; Rettore, E. & Schizzerotto, A. (2018), ‘Are vocational training programmes worth their cost? Evidence from a cost-benefit analysis,’ Politica economica, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1429/92119
  3. Berk, R. A. (2008), ‘Classification and regression trees (CART),’ Statistical Learning From a Regression Perspective, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77501-2_3
  4. Borik, V.; Durica, M.; Molnarova, M. & Svabova, L. (2015), The Net Effects of Graduate Work Experience and the Promotion of Self-Employment: Technical Report, The Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Family of the Slovak Republic.
  5. Bratti, M.; Ghirelli, C.; Havari, E. & Santangelo, G. (2021), ‘Vocational training for unemployed youth in Latvia,’ Journal of Population Economics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 677–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-021-00877-8
  6. Breiman, L.; Friedman, J. H.; Olshen, R. A. & Stone, C. J. (1984), Classification and Regression Trees, London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  7. Caliendo, M. & Schmidl, R. (2016), ‘Youth unemployment and active labor market policies in Europe,’ IZA Journal of Labor Policy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-016-0057-x
  8. Cappellini, E.; Maitino, M.; Patacchini, V. & Sciclone, N. (2019), ‘Are traineeships stepping-stones for youth working careers in Italy?’ International Journal of Manpower, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1389–1410. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2018-0099
  9. Cerulli, G. (2015), Econometric Evaluation of Socio-Economic Programs: Theory and Applications,’ New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  10. COLSAF SR (2022), Príspevok na vykonávanie absolventskej praxe—§ 51 [Allowance for school-leaver practice performance—§51]. Retrieved from https://www.upsvr.gov.sk/sluzbyzamestnanosti/nastroje-aktivnych-opatreni-trhu-prace/prispevky-preobcana/51-prispevok-na-vykonavanie-absolventskej-praxe.html?page_id=12940 [accessed Feb 2022]
  11. Costabella, L. M. (2017), ‘Do high school graduates benefit from intensive vocational training?’ International Journal of Manpower, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 746–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2016-0008
  12. Donato, L.; Migliore, M. C. & Poy, S. (2018), ‘Employment effects of vocational training: An evaluation using propensity score matching,’ Politica economica, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1429/92121
  13. Dutt, P. K. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2021), ‘The legal implications of public support policies targeting research, development and innovation in the European Union,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 102–129. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0017
  14. Fossati, F.; Liechti, F. & Wilson, A. (2021), ‘Participation in labour market programmes: A positive or negative signal of employability?’ Acta Sociologica, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699320902837
  15. Frondel, M. & Schmidt, C. M. (2005), ‘Evaluating environmental programs: The perspective of modern evaluation research,’ Ecological Economics, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.013
  16. Grinevica, L. & Rivza, B. (2018), ‘Economic costs of youth unemployment in the European Union,’ Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference “Economic Science for Rural Development,” Jelgava, LLU ESAF, 9–11 May 2018, no. 48, pp. 299–305. https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2018.098
  17. Harvan, P. (2011), Hodnotenie efektívnosti a účinnosti výdavkov na aktívne politiky trhu práce na Slovensku [Evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of active labor market policy expenditures in Slovakia], Ministry of Finance of Slovak Republic.
  18. Hora, O. & Sirovátka, T. (2020), ‘Why targeting matters: The apprenticeship program for youth in the Czech Republic,’ Social Policy & Administration, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1198–1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12598
  19. Khandker, S. R.; Koolwal, G. B. & Samad, H. A. (2009), Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices, The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8028-4
  20. Kluve, J.; Puerto, S.; Robalino, D. A.; Romero, J. M.; Rother, F.; Stöterau, J.; Weidenkaff, F. & Witte, M. (2019), ‘Do youth employment programs improve labor market outcomes? A quantitative review,’ World Development, vol. 114, pp. 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.10.004
  21. Krasnopjorovs, O. (2020), ‘Have the Baltic countries run out of labour reserves?’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0021
  22. Künnapas, K. (2021), ‘Legal engineering of the anti-abuse rule in ATAD: Architecture of the regression tree model,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 65–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0015
  23. Morgan, S. L. & Winship, C. (2014), Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107587991
  24. Mueller, C. E.; Gaus, H. & Rech, J. (2014), ‘The counterfactual self-estimation of program participants: Impact assessment without control groups or pretests,’ American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013503182
  25. OECD (2021), ‘Young people’s concerns during COVID-19: Results from risks that matter 2020,’ OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), 6 July. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/young-people-s-concerns-during-covid-19-results-from-risks-that-matter-2020-64b51763/ [accessed Feb 2022]
  26. Pirciog, S.; Ciuca, V. & Popescu, M. E. (2015), ‘The net impact of training measures from active labour market programs in Romania–subjective and objective evaluation,’ 4th World Conference on Business, Economics and Management, vol. 26, pp. 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00862-X
  27. Popescu, M. E. & Roman, M. (2018), ‘Vocational training and employability: Evaluation evidence from Romania,’ Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 67, pp. 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.11.001
  28. Potluka, O.; Brůha, J.; Špaček, M. & Vrbová, L. (2016), ‘Counterfactual impact evaluation on EU cohesion policy interventions in training in companies,’ Ekonomický časopis, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 575–595.
  29. Rotar, L. J. (2018), ‘The effects of expenditures for labour market policy on unemployment rate,’ Business Systems Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 55–64. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2018-0005
  30. Rotar, L. J. (2021), ‘Evaluation of the effectiveness of employment programme on young unemployed people,’ Engineering Economics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 60–69. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.32.1.23276
  31. Shmueli, G. & Mani, D. (2013), ‘Impact assessment in observational studies: A classification and regression tree approach,’ Working Paper, Indian School of Business.
  32. Štefánik, M.; Karasová, K. & Studená, I. (2020), ‘Can supporting workplace insertions of unemployed recent graduates improve their longterm employability?’ Empirica, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9413-y
  33. Štefánik, M.; Lubyová, M.; Doválová, G. & Karasová, K. (2014), Analýza účinkov nástrojov aktívnej politiky trhu práce [Analysis of the effects of active labor market policy measures], The Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Family of the Slovak Republic. Retrieved from https://www.ia.gov.sk/data/files/np_csd_I/KOZ/Analyza_ucinkov_nastrojov_aktivnej_politiky_trhu_prace_finalna_verzia.pdf [accessed Feb 2022]
  34. Svabova, L. & Kramarova, K. (2021), ‘An analysis of participation factors and effects of the active labour market measure graduate practice in Slovakia— counterfactual approach,’ Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 86, art. 101917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101917
  35. Svabova, L.; Kramarova, K. & Gabrikova, B. (2022), ‘Counterfactual assessment of the allowance for school-leaver practice performance as a measure of active labour market policy in Slovakia,’ Ekonomický časopis, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 99–123. https://doi.org/10.31577/ekoncas.2022.02.01
  36. Trivellato, U. (2011), ‘Fifteen years of labour market regulations and policies in Italy: What have we learned from their evaluation?’ Statistica, vol. 71, no. 2, art. 2. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-2201/3610
  37. Westreich, D.; Lessler, J. & Funk, M. J. (2010), ‘Propensity score estimation: Neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression,’ Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 826–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.020
  38. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  39. Youth Employment Policy Conference (2022), Youth Employment Policy Conference Online. Retrieved from https://youthemploymentpolicy-conference-online.konfeo.com/en/groups-?fbclid=IwAR1lQ9Yu4YsXyfeBvagJKdTzyAgu3KwXm2DhG1jQO6DuDRyimsMZzUULVqU [accessed Feb 2022]
  40. Zieliński, M. (2015), ‘Unemployment and labor market policy in Visegrad Group countries,’ Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 185–201. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2015.032
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2023-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 177 - 200
Published on: May 24, 2023
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Barbora Gabrikova, Lucia Svabova, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.