Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Artificial Intelligence, Value Alignment and Rationality Cover

Artificial Intelligence, Value Alignment and Rationality

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Arnold, T.; Kasenberg, D. & Scheutz, M. (2017), ‘Value alignment or misalignment—what will keep systems accountable?’ The AAAI -17 Workshop on AI, Ethics, and Society, WS-17-02. Retrieved from https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/WS/AAAIW17/paper/view/15216/14648 [accessed Dec 2020]
  2. Berlin, I. (2013[1947]), ‘The pursuit of the ideal,’ in H. Hardy (ed.) The Crooked Timber of Humanity, Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  3. Bostrom, N. (2003), ‘Are you living in a computer simulation?’ Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 211, pp. 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00309
  4. Bostrom, N. (2019), ‘The vulnerable world hypothesis,’ Global Policy, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12718
  5. Bryson, J. (2018), ‘Patiency is not a virtue: The design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics,’ Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9448-6
  6. Chalmers, D. (2010), ‘The singularity: A philosophical analysis,’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 17, nos. 9–10, pp. 7–65.
  7. European Commission (2019a), A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Disciplines. Retrieved from https://www.aepd.es/media/docs/ai-definition.pdf [accessed Sep 2021]
  8. European Commission (2019b), Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation [accessed Dec 2020]
  9. Fisac, J. F.; Gates, M. A.; Hamrick, J. B.; Liu, C.; Hadfield-Menell, D.; Palaniappan, M.; Malik, D.; Sastry S. S.; Griffiths, T. L. & Dragan, A. D. (2018), ‘Pragmatic-pedagogic value alignment,’ in N. Amato, N. G. Hager, S. Thomas & M. Torres-Torriti (eds.) Robotics Research: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics 10, Cham: Springer, pp. 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28619-4_7
  10. Gabriel, I. (2020), ‘Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment,’ Minds and Machines, vol. 30, pp. 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2
  11. IBM (2019), ‘Everyday ethics for artificial intelligence’, IBM Corp. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/watson/assets/duo/pdf/everydayethics.pdf [accessed Sep 2021]
  12. IEEE (2019), Ethically Aligned Design. A Vision for Prioritizing Human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Incorporated. Retrieved from https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/ead1e.pdf [accessed Dec 2020]
  13. Joamets, K. & Chochia, A. (2021), ‘Access to artificial intelligence for persons with disabilities: Legal and ethical questions concerning the application of trustworthy AI,’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 51−66. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2021.1.04
  14. Kagan, S. (2019), How to Count Animals, More or Less, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Kerikmäe, T.; Müürsepp, P.; Pihl, H. M.; Hamuľák, O. & Kocharyan, H. (2020), ‘Legal person- or agenthood of artificial intelligence technologies,’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 73–92. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.2.05
  16. Kesa, A. & Kerikmäe, T. (2020), ‘Artificial intelligence and the GDPR: Inevitable nemeses?’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 68−90. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0022
  17. Maxwell, N. (2021), The World Crisis – And What to do About It. A Revolution for Thought and Action, New Jersey, London, etc.: World Scientific.
  18. Nyman-Metcalf, K. & Kerikmäe, T. (2021), ‘Machines are taking over—are we ready? Law and Artificial Intelligence,’ Singapore Academy of Law Journal, vol. 33, pp. 24−49.
  19. Russell, S. (2019), Human Compatible AI and the Problem of Control, London: Penguin Books.
  20. Russell, S.; Dewey, D. & Tegmark, M. (2016), ‘Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence,’ AI Magazine, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v36i4.2577
  21. Searle, J. R. (1980), ‘Minds, brains, and programs,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 417–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
  22. Shulman, C. & Bostrom, N. (2021), ‘Sharing the world with digital minds,’ in S. Clarke, H. Zohny & J. Savulescu (eds.) Rethinking Moral Status, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192894076.003.0018
  23. Soares, N. (2015), The Value Learning Problem, Technical Report, Machine Intelligence Research Institute.
  24. Soares, N. & Fallenstein, B. (2014), Aligning Superintelligence with Human Interests: A Technical Research Agenda, Technical Report, Machine Intelligence Research Institute.
  25. Sutrop, M. (2020), ‘Challenges of aligning artificial intelligence with human values,’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 54–72. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.2.04
  26. Zamyatin, Y. (1993), We, London: Penguin Classics.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 98
Published on: Jun 23, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Zhumagul Bekenova, Peeter Müürsepp, Gulzhikhan Nurysheva, Laura Turarbekova, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.