Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Place-Based Approach in EU Regional Development and Its Application in Latvia Cover

A Place-Based Approach in EU Regional Development and Its Application in Latvia

TalTech Journal of European Studies
Volume 4 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
By:   
Open Access
|May 2014
References

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. (2010), ‘Institutions, Factor Prices and Taxation: Virtues of Strong States?’ American Economic Review, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 115–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.115
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Adams, N.; Alden, J. & Harris, N. (2012), Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Aghion, P. & Howitt, P. (2009), The Economics of Growth, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Alexiadis, S. (2013), Convergence Clubs and Spatial Externalities: Models and Applications of Regional Convergence in Europe, Advances in Spatial Science, Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31626-5
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Auerbach, A. J. (2009), ‘Implementing the New Fiscal Policy Activism,’ American Economic Review, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 543–549. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1257/aer.99.2.543
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bachtler, J. & Yuill, D. (2007), Regional Policy in Western Europe: Taking Stock of the Shift in Paradigm, Bochum: RUFIS.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Baltiņa, L. (2011), ‘Uz vietu balstīta pieeja ES reģionālās politikas efektivitātes uzlabošanai,’ Latvijas Universitātes raksti: Ekonomika un vadības zinātne, 766. sējums. Riga: Latvijas Universitāte, pp. 106–120.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Baltiņa, L. & Muravska, T. (2012), ‘Eiropas Savienības Kohēzijas politika pēc 2013. gada. Ko tā nozīmē Latvijai?’ Žurnāls “Latvijas intereses Eiropas Savienībā”, no. 1, pp. 46–56.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Barca, F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy, A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent report (Brussels: DG Regio).
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Barca, F. & McCann, P. (2012), ‘The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches,’ Journal of Regional Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 134–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Blizkovsky, P. (2012), Does ‘the Golden Rule’ Translate into ‘Golden’ EU Economic Governance? Policy Brief, Singapore: School of Public Policy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Caroleo, F. E. & Pastore, F. (2010), The Labour Market Impact of the Enlargement, Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2164-2_1
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Capello, R.; Camagni, R. P.; Chizzolini, P. & Fratesi, U., eds. (2008), Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe: European Competitiveness and Global Strategies, Berlin: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Capello, R. & Dentinho, T. P. (2012), Networks, Space and Competitiveness: Evolving Challenges for Sustainable Growth, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781003671
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Chavance, B. (2008), Institutional Economics, London: Routledge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Cooke, B.; Langford, W. T.; Gordon, A. & Bekessy, S. (2012), ‘Social context and the role of collaborative policy making for private land conservation,’ Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 469–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.608549
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Crescenzi, R. & Percoco, M. (2012), Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance, Advances in Spatial Science, Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_2
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Dale, A.; Dushenko, W. T. & Robinson, P. J. (2012), Urban Sustainability: Reconnecting Space and Place, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Dall’erba, S.; Lim, J.; Tong, D. & Plane, D. (2011), ‘New Perspectives on Regional Development,’ Région et développement, vol. 33, pp. 5–8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Dawkins, C. J. (2007), ‘Space and the Measurement of Income Segregation,’ Journal of Regional Science, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 255–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00508.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Diedrichs, U.; Reiners, W. & Wessels, V. (2011), The Dynamics of Change in EU Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Dunleavy, P.; Margetts, H.; Bastow, S. & Tinkler, J. (2006), Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State and E-Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. EC (2010), Europe 2020: A European Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Communication from the Commission, COM (2010)2020, 03.03.2010, Brussels: European Commission.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. ESPON (2009), ‘ESPON: European Spatial Planning Observation Network. Territorial Observation No. 2,’ The ESPON 2013 Programme, Nov 2009, Luxembourg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Faludi, A. (2010), Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? Abingdon: Routledge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Farole, T.; Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Storper, M. (2011), ‘Cohesion policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions,’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1089–1111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Fritsch, M. & Noseleit, F. (2013), ‘Investigating the Anatomy of the Employment Effects of the Business Formation,’ Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 349–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes030
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Grzeszczak, R. & Karolewski, I. P. (2012), The Multi-Level and Polycentric European Union: Legal and Political Studies, Münster: LIT Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Hiro, I. (2008), ‘What Does Endogenous Growth Theory Tell about Regional Economies? Empirics of R&D Worker–based Productivity Growth Regional Studies,’ Regional Studies, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 947–960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400701541847
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Howitt, P. (2007), ‘Edmund Phelps: Macroeconomist and Social Scientist,’ The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 203–224.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Karlson, C.; Johansson, B. & Stough, R. R. (2012), Entrepreneurship, Social Capital and Governance: Directions for the Sustainable Development and Competitiveness of Regions, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781002841
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. OECD (2008), ‘Making the Most of Regional Development Policy through Multi-level Governance,’ in Territorial Reviews: Poland 2008, Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 171–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264049529-5-en
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. —— (2009), OECD Regions at a Glance, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. McCann, P. (2010), Modern Urban and Regional Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Menard, C. & Shirley, M. (2008), New Institutional Economics: Institutions and Development, Berlin: Springer.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Mendez, C.; Bachtler, J. & Wishlade, F. (2011), Visions and Options for Cohesion Policy after 2013, Report to European Parliament, Brussels: European Parliament.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Molle, W. (2011), Economic Governance in the EU: Implementing Policies with the Financial and Coordination Modes, London: Routledge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Muravska, T. (2012), ‘Crisis in Latvia – economic transformation: the regional dimension and development constraints,’ in G. Gorzelak, C. Goh & K. Fazekas (eds.) Adaptability and Change – the Regional Dimensions in Central and Eastern Europe, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar”, pp. 245–268.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Nijkamp, P. (2011), Innovation, Growth and Competitiveness: Dynamic Regions in the Knowledge-Based World Economy, Advances in Spatial Science, Berlin: Springer.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Olsen, J. P. (2010), Governing Through Institution Building: Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiments in Democratic Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Panara, C. & De Backer, A., eds. (2011), The Role of the Regions in the EU Governance, Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11903-3
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Paulsen, K. (2013), ‘The Effects of Growth Management on the Spatial Extent of Urban Development,’ Land Economics, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 193–210.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. SRDA (2008), Survey ‘Trends of Social Economic Development of Towns and Cities of Latvia’, Riga: The State Regional Development Agency.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. —— (2012), Pārskats “Reģionu attīstība Latvijā 2011” [Survey ‘Development of Regions in Latvia 2011’], Riga: The State Regional Development Agency.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Prezioso, M. (2008), ‘Is it possible to give the territorial dimension more relevance for choices of competitiveness and sustainability policies?’ Transition Studies Review, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–19.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Sabel, C. & Zeitlin, J. (2010), ‘Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU,’ in C. F. Sabel & J. Zeitlin (eds.) Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–28.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Servillo, L. (2010), ‘Territorial Cohesion Discourses: Hegemonic Strategic Concepts in European Spatial Planning,’ Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 397–416.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Solow, R. M. (2000), Growth Theory: An Exposition, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Stead, D. (2013), ‘Dimensions of territorial governance,’ Planning Theory and Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 142–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.758494
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Teece, D. (2011), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and growth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Teece, D. & Helfat, C. E. et al. (2007), Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organisations, Oxford & Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Tosics, I. (2011), Governance Challenges and Models for the Cities of Tomorrow, Budapest: Metropolitan Research Institute.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Vaidere, I.; Vanags, E.; Vanags, I. & Vilka, I. (2006), Reģionālā politika un pašvaldību attīstība Eiropas Savienībā un Latvijā, Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Walsh, J. (2013), ‘Remapping the border: geospatial technologies and border activism,’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 969–987.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. Wood, A. & Roberts, S. (2012), Economic Geography: Places, Networks and Flows, Abingdon: Routledge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. World Bank (2009), World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography, Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Zonneveld, W.; De Vries, J. & Janssen-Jansen, L., eds. (2012), European Territorial Governance, Housing and Urban Policy Studies, vol. 35, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 (formerly 2228-0596) | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600 (formerly 2228-0596)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 53
Published on: May 17, 2014
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
place-based approach,
regional development,
territorial cohesion
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Computer sciences, other,
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Social sciences, other

© 2014 Līga Baltiņa, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 4 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
Previous article
Next article