Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Place-Based Approach in EU Regional Development and Its Application in Latvia Cover

A Place-Based Approach in EU Regional Development and Its Application in Latvia

TalTech Journal of European Studies
Volume 4 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
By: Līga Baltiņa  
Open Access
|May 2014

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. (2010), ‘Institutions, Factor Prices and Taxation: Virtues of Strong States?’ American Economic Review, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 115–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.11510.1257/aer.100.2.115
  2. Adams, N.; Alden, J. & Harris, N. (2012), Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
  3. Aghion, P. & Howitt, P. (2009), The Economics of Growth, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  4. Alexiadis, S. (2013), Convergence Clubs and Spatial Externalities: Models and Applications of Regional Convergence in Europe, Advances in Spatial Science, Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31626-510.1007/978-3-642-31626-5
  5. Auerbach, A. J. (2009), ‘Implementing the New Fiscal Policy Activism,’ American Economic Review, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 543–549. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1257/aer.99.2.543
  6. Bachtler, J. & Yuill, D. (2007), Regional Policy in Western Europe: Taking Stock of the Shift in Paradigm, Bochum: RUFIS.
  7. Baltiņa, L. (2011), ‘Uz vietu balstīta pieeja ES reģionālās politikas efektivitātes uzlabošanai,’ Latvijas Universitātes raksti: Ekonomika un vadības zinātne, 766. sējums. Riga: Latvijas Universitāte, pp. 106–120.
  8. Baltiņa, L. & Muravska, T. (2012), ‘Eiropas Savienības Kohēzijas politika pēc 2013. gada. Ko tā nozīmē Latvijai?’ Žurnāls “Latvijas intereses Eiropas Savienībā”, no. 1, pp. 46–56.
  9. Barca, F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy, A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent report (Brussels: DG Regio).
  10. Barca, F. & McCann, P. (2012), ‘The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches,’ Journal of Regional Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 134–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
  11. Blizkovsky, P. (2012), Does ‘the Golden Rule’ Translate into ‘Golden’ EU Economic Governance? Policy Brief, Singapore: School of Public Policy.
  12. Caroleo, F. E. & Pastore, F. (2010), The Labour Market Impact of the Enlargement, Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2164-2_110.1007/978-3-7908-2164-2_1
  13. Capello, R.; Camagni, R. P.; Chizzolini, P. & Fratesi, U., eds. (2008), Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe: European Competitiveness and Global Strategies, Berlin: Springer.
  14. Capello, R. & Dentinho, T. P. (2012), Networks, Space and Competitiveness: Evolving Challenges for Sustainable Growth, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781003671
  15. Chavance, B. (2008), Institutional Economics, London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203888582
  16. Cooke, B.; Langford, W. T.; Gordon, A. & Bekessy, S. (2012), ‘Social context and the role of collaborative policy making for private land conservation,’ Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 469–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.60854910.1080/09640568.2011.608549
  17. Crescenzi, R. & Percoco, M. (2012), Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance, Advances in Spatial Science, Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_210.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_2
  18. Dale, A.; Dushenko, W. T. & Robinson, P. J. (2012), Urban Sustainability: Reconnecting Space and Place, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442661776
  19. Dall’erba, S.; Lim, J.; Tong, D. & Plane, D. (2011), ‘New Perspectives on Regional Development,’ Région et développement, vol. 33, pp. 5–8.
  20. Dawkins, C. J. (2007), ‘Space and the Measurement of Income Segregation,’ Journal of Regional Science, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 255–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00508.x10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00508.x
  21. Diedrichs, U.; Reiners, W. & Wessels, V. (2011), The Dynamics of Change in EU Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9780857930316
  22. Dunleavy, P.; Margetts, H.; Bastow, S. & Tinkler, J. (2006), Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State and E-Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296194.001.0001
  23. EC (2010), Europe 2020: A European Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Communication from the Commission, COM (2010)2020, 03.03.2010, Brussels: European Commission.
  24. ESPON (2009), ‘ESPON: European Spatial Planning Observation Network. Territorial Observation No. 2,’ The ESPON 2013 Programme, Nov 2009, Luxembourg.
  25. Faludi, A. (2010), Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203842324
  26. Farole, T.; Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Storper, M. (2011), ‘Cohesion policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions,’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1089–1111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x
  27. Fritsch, M. & Noseleit, F. (2013), ‘Investigating the Anatomy of the Employment Effects of the Business Formation,’ Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 349–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes03010.1093/cje/bes030
  28. Grzeszczak, R. & Karolewski, I. P. (2012), The Multi-Level and Polycentric European Union: Legal and Political Studies, Münster: LIT Verlag.
  29. Hiro, I. (2008), ‘What Does Endogenous Growth Theory Tell about Regional Economies? Empirics of R&D Worker–based Productivity Growth Regional Studies,’ Regional Studies, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 947–960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0034340070154184710.1080/00343400701541847
  30. Howitt, P. (2007), ‘Edmund Phelps: Macroeconomist and Social Scientist,’ The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 203–224.10.1111/j.1467-9442.2007.00489.x
  31. Karlson, C.; Johansson, B. & Stough, R. R. (2012), Entrepreneurship, Social Capital and Governance: Directions for the Sustainable Development and Competitiveness of Regions, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/978178100284110.4337/9781781002841
  32. OECD (2008), ‘Making the Most of Regional Development Policy through Multi-level Governance,’ in Territorial Reviews: Poland 2008, Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 171–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264049529-5-en10.1787/9789264049529-5-en
  33. —— (2009), OECD Regions at a Glance, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  34. McCann, P. (2010), Modern Urban and Regional Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  35. Menard, C. & Shirley, M. (2008), New Institutional Economics: Institutions and Development, Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_25
  36. Mendez, C.; Bachtler, J. & Wishlade, F. (2011), Visions and Options for Cohesion Policy after 2013, Report to European Parliament, Brussels: European Parliament.
  37. Molle, W. (2011), Economic Governance in the EU: Implementing Policies with the Financial and Coordination Modes, London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203828687
  38. Muravska, T. (2012), ‘Crisis in Latvia – economic transformation: the regional dimension and development constraints,’ in G. Gorzelak, C. Goh & K. Fazekas (eds.) Adaptability and Change – the Regional Dimensions in Central and Eastern Europe, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar”, pp. 245–268.
  39. Nijkamp, P. (2011), Innovation, Growth and Competitiveness: Dynamic Regions in the Knowledge-Based World Economy, Advances in Spatial Science, Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-14965-8
  40. Olsen, J. P. (2010), Governing Through Institution Building: Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiments in Democratic Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  41. Panara, C. & De Backer, A., eds. (2011), The Role of the Regions in the EU Governance, Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11903-310.1007/978-3-642-11903-3
  42. Paulsen, K. (2013), ‘The Effects of Growth Management on the Spatial Extent of Urban Development,’ Land Economics, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 193–210.10.3368/le.89.2.193
  43. SRDA (2008), Survey ‘Trends of Social Economic Development of Towns and Cities of Latvia’, Riga: The State Regional Development Agency.
  44. —— (2012), Pārskats “Reģionu attīstība Latvijā 2011” [Survey ‘Development of Regions in Latvia 2011’], Riga: The State Regional Development Agency.
  45. Prezioso, M. (2008), ‘Is it possible to give the territorial dimension more relevance for choices of competitiveness and sustainability policies?’ Transition Studies Review, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–19.10.1007/s11300-008-0165-4
  46. Sabel, C. & Zeitlin, J. (2010), ‘Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU,’ in C. F. Sabel & J. Zeitlin (eds.) Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–28.
  47. Servillo, L. (2010), ‘Territorial Cohesion Discourses: Hegemonic Strategic Concepts in European Spatial Planning,’ Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 397–416.10.1080/14649357.2010.500135
  48. Solow, R. M. (2000), Growth Theory: An Exposition, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  49. Stead, D. (2013), ‘Dimensions of territorial governance,’ Planning Theory and Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 142–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.75849410.1080/14649357.2012.758494
  50. Teece, D. (2011), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and growth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  51. Teece, D. & Helfat, C. E. et al. (2007), Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organisations, Oxford & Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
  52. Tosics, I. (2011), Governance Challenges and Models for the Cities of Tomorrow, Budapest: Metropolitan Research Institute.
  53. Vaidere, I.; Vanags, E.; Vanags, I. & Vilka, I. (2006), Reģionālā politika un pašvaldību attīstība Eiropas Savienībā un Latvijā, Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
  54. Walsh, J. (2013), ‘Remapping the border: geospatial technologies and border activism,’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 969–987.10.1068/d18112
  55. Wood, A. & Roberts, S. (2012), Economic Geography: Places, Networks and Flows, Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203841549
  56. World Bank (2009), World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography, Washington, DC: World Bank.
  57. Zonneveld, W.; De Vries, J. & Janssen-Jansen, L., eds. (2012), European Territorial Governance, Housing and Urban Policy Studies, vol. 35, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 53
Published on: May 17, 2014
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
place-based approach,
regional development,
territorial cohesion
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Computer sciences, other,
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Social sciences, other

© 2014 Līga Baltiņa, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 4 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)Next article